We can argue all we want, but with only failures to show for when asked for results, we just dont stand a chance, especially in a forum populated by people who have a thriving defense industry according to their needs (majority of countries), even when we have some valid points. But i will say that i am glad that we still are trying and not giving up.
This all feels like it's coming from some unaddressed, underlying sense of "competitiveness". The whole fascination with winning "wars of perception" - because so many (and I'm not accusing you currently of being one) seem to only care about declaring some poorly contrived notions of success, they therefore become "superior" to the other. It helps in those circumstances to have "ammo" for internet fights. We see it all the time and it's not even limited to countries or tribes/groups like sporting teams.
I'd say maybe I'm singling out this part but it seems to me as some grievance about not being able to "one up" China and therefore having less ammo for internet debates. I mean I see Indian nationalists engage in crazy levels of grand proclamations online and it certainly would help them if for example Uttam radar was indeed xyz in service year 2018 or whatever they were claiming. Point is this is entirely the wrong place for this sort of talk unless you want to invite members to feel sorry for India or make fun of it (only will get one or the other).
Which sort of leads to the second point I want to make and it's a general statement based on personal observation and beliefs.
Still,
I would choose our relentless efforts, even if we fail spectacularly each time, over the stagnation of never trying at all. Failures are inevitable, and we should never let them deter us. It doesn’t matter if the world laughs or seeks to dehumanize us – we must continue to push forward. We left behind the brits in space capabilites despite them equating us to and killing us like .
We need to learn and innovate better paths in order to get to our dreams, not just give up if we fail to do so.
Why does India generally choose to stand more on the side of these imperialists? This isn't a question for you. It's a rhetorical one. Unfortunately the answer is complicated and I know what the intersect of Indian nationalists and China hating Indians will believe when it comes to this question.
Still China was the one that truly carved out its own path when it started in the mid - late 20th century. India could do the same but you will find Indians online talking so much shit about China it was bound to cultivate Chinese hatred... and there's certainly much more of it now than there was in the past as I've always said even more than a decade ago. The level to which this is true surprises even me. Can India not also carve out its own space and begin its own rejuvenation without having to participate in QUAD or whatever next failure will be? No it's not about Pakistan or border disputes with China. Refusal to stand alone and work with China while constantly acting under the faith of western manipulation about China.
I mean western manipulation was literally what started India China border dispute at Ladakh.
More Indians prefer to see China suffer than the West. I think this sort of provides an insight into your passage i've quoted. As other Chinese have said in the past... individuals smarter than myself, people always just respect wealth and power. Focus on cultivating these and enemies fall themselves if they're not asking to partner with you. It's where the 'China, do nothing, win' meme comes from.