This all hearkens back to the colonial period's unstable native circumstances around the world which were exploited by the colonial powers with a systemic divide and conquer strategy which includes preserving as much native instability, stagnation, and therefore opportunities for exploitation as possible to this day.
In the Middle East native secular nationalists who represented the most promising faction for overall societal growth and development were made the primary targets of the colonial powers as well as native feudal factions such as the monarchies and clergies and their supporters. The founding of Israel and the Arab losses in the various Arab-Israeli wars also proved to be a disaster for the secular nationalists. Syria's civil war marks the final Middle Eastern native secular nationalist government to fall regardless of whether Assad survives in part of the country or not.
Whether the monarchies and religious factions which are now left to run the Middle East will be good for growth and development or not remains to be seen, but it doesn't look promising and these factions will probably keep fighting until there is only one standing.
yes, the actions of the u.s. in the last decade has only further undermined secularism as a political platform for arab leaders and strengthened the rise of islamic fundamentalism, which is essentially reactionary. however history is not decided between the good and the evil but the strong and the weak. if some pillar of strength should rise up and subdue the rest, then they ought to have something going for them, a more palatable brand of oppression to the people if you will.
Last edited: