You don’t need evidence to deny speculation. You need evidence to support your speculation. Speculation is not by default true without evidence. They’re by default false without evidence.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
H-20 bomber (with H-X, JH-XX)
- Thread starter Deino
- Start date
Very interesting point of view, but it is only your inference, and there is no evidence to deny my speculation.
Oh yes, those "inferences" which I've raised in my previous post are actually very valid points to put question marks on your speculation.
From the perspective of poster propaganda, the abstract vector graphics show the information that the audience generally understands. Why can't we infer that this is based on the creation of h20?
We should be asking you this question instead - Why should we infer that the flying wing object shown in the poster that you've posted is based on the creation of the H-20?
And you still haven't answer the question - Who in what capacity made and published that poster in the first place?
No one has stipulated the capabilities of GJ11, but this is not a discussion of the future. If I were the designer of the poster, in order to celebrate the important day, I must show the major achievements made during this period and inspire people.
So you're still quite new to PLA-watching.
We've gotten plenty of major festival celebratory posters (whether that's during Chinese New Year, PLA Founding Day, National Day of the PRC or others) from Chinese social media accounts of official capacities (PLA Theater Commands, AVIC, respective PLA branches, CSSC, CCTV7 etc) in China for many years which depicts PLA platforms and units that are already in active service for quite some years already.
Are you suggesting that the J-20, 055 and DF-17 somehow do not qualify as "major achievements made during this period and inspire people"?
Regarding the inference of self-service combat capability, I don't see any basis, although I also hope so.
Yes I do. But nowhere did I mean "fully and completely automomous (namely CGCL Level 5)".
And certainly not now for sure, but definitely will be gradually realised, stage-by-stage in the following decades.
Last edited:
You don't need to summarize who I am, and your conclusion about me is a bit presumptuous. I went to a university where I could see the H-6 flying around every week. If I am quite new to PLA-watching, then okay, you are right.Oh yes, those "inferences" which I've raised in my previous post are actually very valid points to put question marks on your speculation.
We should be asking you this question instead - Why should we infer that the flying wing object shown in the poster that you've posted is based on the creation of the H-20?
And you still haven't answer the question - Who in what capacity made and published that poster in the first place?
So you're still quite new to PLA-watching.
We've gotten plenty of major festival celebratory posters (whether that's during Chinese New Year, PLA Founding Day, National Day of the PRC or others) from Chinese social media accounts of official capacities (PLA Theater Commands, AVIC, respective PLA branches, CSSC, CCTV7 etc) in China for many years which depicts PLA platforms and units that are already in active service for quite some years already.
Are you suggesting that the J-20, 055 and DF-17 somehow do not qualify as "major achievements made during this period and inspire people"?
Yes I do. But nowhere did I mean "fully and completely automomous (namely CGCL Level 5)".
And certainly not now for sure, but definitely will be gradually realised, stage-by-stage in the following decades.
You don't need to summarize who I am, and your conclusion about me is a bit presumptuous.
Umm, no. Neither is there a need for me to do that, nor was my focus on you as an individual.
My focus is on the topic of discussion, not you (对事，不对人). But if you want to overthink, that's not on me.
I went to a university where I could see the H-6 flying around every week. If I am quite new to PLA-watching, then okay, you are right.
And?
Plus, until now, you still haven't responded to my questions.
Last edited:
My response is that everything you said is correct. I cannot answer any of your questions. It must be my fault.Umm, no. Neither is there a need for me to do that, nor was my focus on you as an individual.
My focus is on the topic of discussion, not you (对事，不对人). But if you want to overthink, that's not on me.
And?
Plus, until now, you still haven't responded to my questions.