I still wish and hope for a Chinese large turboprop transport aircrafts with takeoff & landing capability on rugged runways... assigned in civilian role (eg. Emergency)
I still wish and hope for a Chinese large turboprop transport aircrafts with takeoff & landing capability on rugged runways... assigned in civilian role (eg. Emergency)
You can think of tech like a smartphone. The newest model will get old in the next five years. You will never be satisfied.
Since they already have gj11 avail, they can make an even more stealthier version equipped with long range stealth missiles or hypersonic.
Then mass produced hundreds of them per year. Send 6-10 gj11 to hunt for b21 and f35 at any given moment. If they produce 100 f35 per year, China should produce 300 gj11 per year. Gj11 or dark sword works alot better than a manned fighter jet
True. Some people get too carried away with emotions on forums sometimes. LoolJust a friendly reminder: We are not a fan-boy forum and in case this was not meant as a joke (I maybe missed) or sarcastic, you should better stop posting nonsense!
To claim, the "Gj11 or dark sword works alot better than a manned fighter jet" is plain ridiculous and also any overhyped "long range stealth missiles or hypersonic" is pure nonsense.
From the perspective of poster creation, the content celebrating the 75th anniversary of the National Day must be meaningful, such as showing the formation flight of the J-20 and GJ11, rather than just a single GJ11.Not sure why that's relevant for this thread; it's just a flying wing and if anything it looks more consistent with a GJ-11/UCAV planform.
From the perspective of poster creation, the content celebrating the 75th anniversary of the National Day must be meaningful, such as showing the formation flight of the J-20 and GJ11, rather than just a single GJ11.
From the perspective of poster creation, the content celebrating the 75th anniversary of the National Day must be meaningful, such as showing the formation flight of the J-20 and GJ11, rather than just a single GJ11.
Very interesting point of view, but it is only your inference, and there is no evidence to deny my speculation. From the perspective of poster propaganda, the abstract vector graphics show the information that the audience generally understands. Why can't we infer that this is based on the creation of h20?And how does this imply that the object shown in the poster refers to (if not is) the H-20?
We don't even know who in what capacity came up with that poster in the first place.
Besides, who stipulated that the GJ-11 certainly cannot fly and conduct missions own its own, especially going into the future? If anything, I see the opposite to the underlined phrase above as being a much more impactful statement (if that's the message which the poster is actually aiming to present, instead of being just a generic greeting poster for the 75th National Day Celebration which I suspect to be the actual case here) than having a J-20 shown alongside that GJ-11.
Namely, the autonomous operational and combat capabilities of large-sized Chinese UCAVs are actually in a more advanced state/stage than what we're currently expecting/anticipating.