You imply somehow Chinese final warnings are linked to the outcomes. Please do elaborate.
My point is some people actually think one-China policy is more than just a peace of paper at this point.
If you see my responses above, not single one suggests rushing into war.
This is a classic strategy similar to how Russia was forced into Ukraine. They will eventually bring it to the point where China will need to choose to 'act' then and there. China is not 100% in control of the timeline as some assume. Taiwan can be coerced into declaration of Independence with US boots on the ground simultaneously backed by several Carrier battle groups and what not East of Taiwan. At that point, US will pull enough countries to recognize the declaration that it has some credence. You can refer to the Ukraine playbook.
You are all assuming China is the only smart player and US is dumb and that China will make the first move and somehow catch US off-guard in it's reunification war. That's not necessarily the case.
We can all quote ancient history, it's good to take lessons from it but one must not be so blinded that you assume the same variables apply today, no they don't.
Your whole post is just copium.
After Pelosi's visit, China clearly turned the situation into its favour.
China unilaterally changed the status quo, without any meaningful push back.
Here you are saying that the future will see how America will stare China down over this.
The future?
What about now!
Nothing but empty rhetoric.