Exported J-7

unknauthr

Junior Member
Pakistani F-7 Crash

A Pakistani F-7 reportedly crashed this past weekend 5 miles southwest of the Mushaf Air Force Base:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The airplane was reportedly on a night time training mission. The pilot was able to eject safely, and there were no injuries on the ground.
 

skyhawk77

Just Hatched
Registered Member
does anyone know about AFZ's mig23s wikipedia says they have six and only two were seen in a 2003 fly past
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

does anyone know the
the actual number?
did they fight in the 1998 DRC war?
are they still active?
are they upgraded?
when were they acquired?

any info will do because to me they are a mystery
 

Chaminuka

Junior Member
Anybody knows more about this?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


To celebrate this the Air force is going to be unveiling their new fresh out of the crate MiG 21's or to be correct their new Chinese copies the F-7. .......
... ....This is a distant photograph of the hanger housing the new Chinese copies of the MiG 21's and the containers seen contain the rest of the fleet of new fighters soon to be in Tanzania's arsenal.
 

Semi-Lobster

Junior Member
Anybody knows more about this?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Old Chengdu F-7A

Sinodefence said:
The F-7A is the export variant of the J-7I. It is powered by an improved 58.8kN thrust WP-7B turbojet engine replacing the original 56.39kN thrust WP-7. The engine also featured an increased overhaul time. The break chute was relocated at base of rudder to improve the landing performance and shorten run. This variant was supplied to Albania and Tanzania in the 1970s.

Also there are 16 of them in total. Tanzania also operates about 6 Shenyang F-5s as well. In the past Tanzania also operated F-6s but has since retired all of them.
 

Chaminuka

Junior Member
At long last - evidence of the Nigerian F-7s.

Posted by MsV at the Key forum.

osa8lz.jpg
 

Semi-Lobster

Junior Member
how many are they

15

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


‘Air Force has recovered its ‘broken wings’
Inducts Chinese multi-role combat aircraft
By PHILIP NWOSU
Thursday, April 08, 2010

The Nigerian Air Force said with the arrival of its F7 aircraft and the successful test of the fighter plane, it has now recovered its broken wings.
Indeed, the Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshall Oluseyi Petinrin said with the successful test of the Chinese multi-role combat aircraft which was recently acquired by the Nigerian Air Force, the force had really returned to the good days.

He spoke during the commissioning of the renovated sports complex and gymnasium at the Sam Ethnan Air Force base Ikeja, saying the Federal Government had empowered the force to reactivate all its inactive aircraft for proper protection of the country’s territorial integrity.

The Federal Government had in 2005 approved $251 million for the purchase of 15 Chengdu F-7 fighters from China. The deal includes 12 F-7NI single seat fighters, and 3 FT-7NI dual-seat trainers. The $251 million package includes $220 million for 15 aircraft, plus $32 million for armaments, including 20 live PL-9C AAM, 10 training PL-9 rounds, unguided rockets, and 250/500 kg bombs. Nigerian pilots began their training in China in 2008, with delivery of the aircraft to begin in 2009.

The Chengdu F-7 is a Chinese-built version of the Soviet Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21.
He said: “Indeed, the problems we have now in the Air Force is that we need pilots because the aircraft are there, but we need more pilots.”

Petinrin said while efforts to sustain fleet enhancement was on, barracks accommodation and facilities were also being renovated to improve on the general well-being of all ranks.
The NAF chief said the problems of the Air Force at this moment was training of pilots to man its new platforms, adding that efforts were on to ensure that the junior officers’ quarters at the Ikeja NAF base would be reconstructed to accommodate 240 units of modern terrace houses.

While urging NAF personnel to rededicate themselves to the achievement of the NAF objectives as a way of reciprocating all that the government was doing to meet their operational and welfare needs, Air Marshall Petinrin said it planned to assist in the completion of two blocks of 12 flats abandoned by the Ministry of Defence to ease accommodation for its personnel.

His words: “What we have done is that, in this year’s budget we have allocated funds for the completion of those abandoned projects. Of course, that money is not in the Air Force, it is in the Ministry of Defence, we will go back to the Ministry of Defence to make sure that those funds allocated for the abandoned project will be quickly utilized to solve our accommodation problems.”
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Gentlemen,

This is my first posting on this blog. I have spend many hours reading all of your very informative posts, and I have a few questions I would like to ask.
My questions are as follows:

1) Will the new trainer (JL-9/FTC-2000) have a single seat fighter version in the works?
2) Do you think that this (fighter) version of the JL-9 will be a slightly lateral or upward improvement of the current version of the J-7?
3) With the enlarger nose cone could modern radar be fitter that can support the use of medium ranger AAM?
4) I have read that the cost of the JL-9 (single set) is around 12 million. If that is true why not just buy the JF-17 single seat and trainer version?

It seam as if this aircraft could be a good stopgap for countries that cannot afford a 4th generation fighter and need to get something in the air until they can acquire replacements.

Thank you,
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I highly doubt that a fighter version of the JL9 would ever be made because the JF17 is aimed squarely at that market segment already. The JL9 is fairly cheap because its a trainer, as soon as you slap on a decent fire control radar and EW gear on it, its cost will greatly increase and will approach the JF17 range while offering much less capabilities.

The reason the PLAAF went with the JL9 is partly because it share a great deal of common components with the J7, so the logistical cost of inducting the type is minimal compared to the JF17 since the PLAAF already have much of the needed logistics set up to support their J7 fleet.

Unless you have the massive logistical investment like the PLAAF, the JF17 would be a better choice then a single seat JL9 unless you really are desperately poor, in which case modern fighter jets is probably not a good idea for you to begin with.
 
Top