For me it looks like 200-300 meters between both aircraft speaking about published video material.From that video, what is the distance between the two aircraft? Is it 30 - 50 m? More?
For me it looks like 200-300 meters between both aircraft speaking about published video material.From that video, what is the distance between the two aircraft? Is it 30 - 50 m? More?
Like I said earlier.
These types of intercepts are common place in overlapping zones where the two sides have mistrust of one another.
That F-15 is not in a "dangerous" intercept position, no more than the Chinese aircraft were earlier.
The press is making a much larger issue out of this than it should be IMHO.
Agree.
What's new however is that we see videos released from the Chinese side which I'm really happy about.
yeah as usual the Japanese are making a very big deal out of it in front of the press, crying wolf. their own planes are doing the very exact same thing but of course when the Chinese do it then it's provocative. I guess the best thing china can do is publish their own pictures of Japanese planes when they meet in the air and accuse them of the same.
Which is why I stated that the implementation of the ADIZ was a provocative act, that would result in more tension, more close encounters, and opportunities all around for a screw-up. The US government condemned its implementation primarily for the reasons stated, and not as an attempt to "contain" China. So even though the vast majority of "intercepts" will always be benign, the tensions, animosity, and proximity are real. This has brought the focus of many peoples concerns about China, to a conclusion that maybe China is "looking for trouble". Sending bombers on patrol is provocative, and makes a statement, that's why the US flew through the ADIZ shortly after it implementation as a protest, to be noticed, and to make a statement that we objected, the bombers were unarmed and flew a very non-provocative mission profile.
Each of us as posters have an opinion, each of us have a viewpoint, yes mine is pro-US/US partners, but my point is that like the "line in the sand" or a "red line", each action by the "players" has an impact, whether you view it as positive, negative, or neutral is determined by either good sense, or your personal "loyalties" or sometimes a combination of both.
It is my considered opinion, that both the US and China, need to take a step back from the situation and look at it from the others perspective and "cool it down"...... the positive impact of Rim-Pac, may be "undone" by the inconsequential "posturing" that leads to bad feelings, and the affirmation that maybe those "feelings" are justified. Taking a step back could remind each of us that we have far more invested in a positive relationship, than we could possibly gain from igniting a "flame war" on the stage of world opinion?? just a thought??????
The Japanese side has demanded officially that the pictures and videos to be taken down from the Chinese Ministry of Defense's website.
China's response?
Ministry of foreign affairs has opened called it "shameless, boring, and unreasonable"
You could be pro-US and still recognize the hypocrisy of US's stance on China's ADIZ. The notion that it's OK for US and allies to establish ADIZs, but not for others is weak sauce.Each of us as posters have an opinion, each of us have a viewpoint, yes mine is pro-US/US partners, but my point is that like the "line in the sand" or a "red line", each action by the "players" has an impact, whether you view it as positive, negative, or neutral is determined by either good sense, or your personal "loyalties" or sometimes a combination of both.
Agreed. But who will take the first step? I think since the US is the stronger party, it's better for her to reach across the divide. More PR games will only make things worse and not better.It is my considered opinion, that both the US and China, need to take a step back from the situation and look at it from the others perspective and "cool it down"......
Good suggestion, AFB, but national sovereignty squabbles are easy to inflate but very hard to deflate, we might have to let the thing run its course. Hopefully, it wouldn't lead to military conflicts.the positive impact of Rim-Pac, may be "undone" by the inconsequential "posturing" that leads to bad feelings, and the affirmation that maybe those "feelings" are justified. Taking a step back could remind each of us that we have far more invested in a positive relationship, than we could possibly gain from igniting a "flame war" on the stage of world opinion?? just a thought??????
sometimes the best method to use against your opponent, is to just copy what your opponent is doing and do the same yourself! of course you first have to have the means to do it. china in the past was just too weak, poor to play these kind of games so it was a one sided affair. they didn't really have a decent airforce or navy until recently. today its a very different situation and china is 'learning the ropes'. china should be able to afford decent cameras and photograph equipment for all their planes that head up to meet their Japanese friends. they should take lots of nice pictures and have them fully published in all media fronts for everyone to enjoy.
The Japanese side has demanded officially that the pictures and videos to be taken down from the Chinese Ministry of Defense's website.
China's response?
How about flashing Japan the Hawaiian good luck sign?