Discussing long term impacts of Ukraine crisis

sndef888

Captain
Registered Member
There is the potential for this to embolden the West in the same way NATO's participation in the Yugoslav Wars drove Russia down the path to the current conflict.

At first I thought it was silly, but a South Korean nuclear arsenal and deployment of US nuclear weapons to Japan is actually a real possibility now. Japan's "enemy base attack capability" (acquiring land attack cruise missiles) is likely a foregone conclusion, and we will likely see even more intense provocations in Taiwan from Japan and the US as part of an effort to "deter" China and assure Taiwan.

I don't think we will see a Europeanization of NATO or whatever. Not only all of the Democrats, but basically every Republican outside of Trump himself and a small number of media supporters are now rabidly anti-Russian. The exact nature of a renewed American focus on Europe is hard to determine right now. If Kyiv falls, perhaps we might see an increase in conventional forces back to Cold War levels.

The Republicans will certainly win in 2022 and 2024, but the fate of Trump now hangs in the balance. His comments on Putin and Ukraine are really going to irk both the Republican Party and a fair number of his supporters. There are two possible outcomes I can see- someone Trumpish from the Trump administration wins the 2024 candidacy, or Trump some how fudges the nature of his comments like he walked off the "grab 'em by the..." comments, and ends up ok.

The European reaction over Ukraine is a little concerning, with the way that many nations have completely thrown away their economic ties with Russia. It makes me wonder how European nations might react to a conflict over Taiwan. We saw reluctance from European nations over SWIFT; I don't think we can say for sure how they will react to Taiwan- all China can do is build up economic ties to the greatest extent possible so that Europe will have no choice but to stay neutral lest they destroy their economies.

In a worst case scenario, we might see nations become more economically isolationist and self-sufficient, which would destroy China's economic leverage over them during a Taiwan conflict and pit Europe against China in such a crisis, and cause Japan, Australia, et al to throw caution into the wind and become even more antagonistic towards China than they were already. China can survive this, but ideally this hopefully won't happen.

If the "Second Cold War" was just a concept for the general public before, the world will quite visibly be split between two blocs; one Western led, the other "semi-non-aligned"*. The first will basically be the Cold War US bloc 2.0 (Western democracies and their authoritarian henchmen), while the second will be nominally led by China and consist of nations who are more about development and cooperation rather than antagonism over certain political issues. I don't think we will see a Cold War style non-aligned movement arise, China already has a policy of non-interference in domestic affairs (unlike the USSR), and therefore there isn't much need for such a bloc to be created.

China really needs to get its nuclear expansion complete and operational ASAP. A large nuclear arsenal will be the bedrock of stability going forwards. I am unaware of the reasons why China doesn't keep warheads mounted on missiles during peacetime, but if the reasons aren't critical (like command and control related), beginning to do so would be a good idea.

And then the biggest thing for China- educating its future leaders and people in general so they don't make mistakes like the ones that spiraled to the Ukraine conflict; political or otherwise. If you look at a graph of the Soviet economy, it was growing non-stop literally until Stalin died, and then things went downhill from there- we don't want a similar situation happening with Xi.

*The "semi-non-aligned" movement isn't really a bloc per se, just nations with normal healthy relations who aren't interested in the hypocrisy and various problems of the US and its allies.
I think South Korea and Japan will make some statements to get nuclear protection or even their own nukes but China will apply pressure and nothing will happen in the end. Nuclear armed Korea/Japan is an incredibly huge provocation which I think even their own populations won't support. Japan has a huge anti nuke lobby.
 

sndef888

Captain
Registered Member
As if the budget was the problem.....This is utterly moronic
Mind sharing why? I'm not very well versed on german defence issues. Only thing I know is they are building large destroyers with good sensors but pathetic armaments
 

Philister

Junior Member
Registered Member
Mind sharing why? I'm not very well versed on german defence issues. Only thing I know is they are building large destroyers with good sensors but pathetic armaments
Their problem is about how to use the budget effectively and maintain their shit so when the enemies come there would be usable fighter jets and helos
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Is Belt and Road on hold and/or finished in Europe?
@siegecrossbow Sir from my understanding BRI is about developing the Eurasia landmass and the important pieces is Russia, China had been courting Russia for a long time because its her sphere of Influence, Europe is a bonus. You can see the difference in strategy China and the West employed, the West use coercion, exploitation and threat while China use business opportunity and development. So who will they choose and why so many country sign up on BRI, Sir I place these question to those so called expert to answer. ;)
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
There are definetely a lot consequences so will just write some short thoughts of mine:


Europe will rearm, Europe will then be able to match Russia's power and thus reduce Russia's power and threat to the European theater. Europe's economy is in shambles. Significant increase of military spending will eat up domestic economic investment. Increased energy costs (Putin stop the gas please) and raw material costs will be big blow to Europe. Inflation will now be even worse. Probably entering stagflation territory

US is (short term) laughing all the way to the bank. Capital flight to the US will keep debt rates down even If (probably won't do it now the way things are) the FED raises rates. Will allow US to fully focus on China when Europe becomes militarily strong (Europe might need
10+ years to develop that much). Also EU becomes much closer to the US

Disadvantage is that this is a big blow to its prestige for being a Hegemon and that the SWIFT/bank assets sanctions to Russia are a tremendously huge blow to the the US Financial Pillar holding its Hegemony in the world. This has just accelerated China's progress towards building its own financial system


China finally gets Russia as a junior partner. Central Asia BRI/integration/economic/strategic projects now move forward. Guaranteed access to Russian ultra cheap raw materials, energy, human capital (engineers/scientists). Most probably we will see China gaining strategic concessions from Russia on the Arctic.
Huge economic gain from weakened Europe's industry.



Russia is a huge loser. Its currency lost like 1/3 of its value overnight. The West just stole from it $250+ billion of Russia's central bank assets. Its people will get a lot poorer which might (will..) lead to instability. Became China's junior partner without even asking anything in return from China (Putin masterstroke..). Central Asia influence significantly weakened. Weapon exports will decline a lot more (seen their performance in Ukraine?). Will lose a lot of prestige for its incompetent military tactics used and miscalculations in the battlefield. Invasion of Ukraine has now probably scared other countries to join NATO for protection ASAP. Kinda counter-productive to Russia' interests of driving NATO out of its neighborhood
 
Last edited:

sequ

Major
Registered Member
There are definetely a lot consequences so will just write some short thoughts of mine:


Europe will rearm, Europe will then be able to match Russia's power and thus reduce Russia's power and threat to the European theater. Europe's economy is in shambles. Significant increase of military spending will eat up domestic economic investment. Increased energy costs (Putin stop the gas please) and raw material costs will be big blow to Europe. Inflation will now be even worse. Probably entering stagflation territory

US is (short term) laughing all the way to the bank. Capital flight to the US will keep debt rates down even If (probably won't do it now the way things are) the FED raises rates. Will allow US to fully focus on China when Europe becomes militarily strong (Europe might need
10+ years to develop that much). Also EU becomes much closer to the US

Disadvantage is that this is a big blow to its prestige for being a Hegemon and that the SWIFT/bank assets sanctions to Russia are a tremendously huge blow to the the US Financial Pillar holding its Hegemony in the world. This has just accelerated China's progress towards building its own financial system


China finally gets Russia as a junior partner. Central Asia BRI/integration/economic/strategic projects now move forward. Guaranteed access to Russian ultra cheap raw materials, energy, human capital (engineers/scientists). Most probably we will see China gaining strategic concessions from Russia on the Arctic.
Huge economic gain from weakened Europe's industry.



Russia is a huge loser. Its currency lost like 1/3 of its value overnight. The West just stole from it $250+ billion of Russia's central bank assets. Its people will get a lot poorer which might (will..) lead to instability. Became China's junior partner without even asking anything in return from China (Putin masterstroke..). Central Asia influence significantly weakened. Weapon exports will decline a lot more (seen their performance in Ukraine?). Will lose a lot of prestige for its incompetent military tactics used and miscalculations in the battlefield. Invasion of Ukraine has now probably scared other countries to join NATO for protection ASAP. Kinda counter-productive to Russia' interests of driving NATO out of its neighborhood
I wonder how much Ukraine will get of Russia's overseas money to rebuild itself if it manages to defeat Putin.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
I wonder how much Ukraine will get of Russia's overseas money to rebuild itself if it manages to defeat Putin.
It depends on how the war goes. If it goes Russia's way I assume they will take Eastern Ukraine (and maybe all coastal areas?) and Western Ukraine will become a neutral and a demilitarized country.

Anything less than this, which allows the Ukraine state (even if reduced in territory) to make independent policies and have a proper military, get ready for the West to use billions and billions to make Ukraine a fortress ala Israel. And as you said, most probably that money would come from the money that the West stole from Russia lol

So for Russia, anything else than the 1st scenario is a disaster.
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
It depends on how the war goes. If it goes Russia's way I assume they will take Eastern Ukraine (and maybe all coastal areas?) and Western Ukraine will become a neutral and a demilitarized country.

Anything less than this, which allows the Ukraine state (even if reduced in territory) to make independent policies and have a proper military, get ready for the West to use billions and billions to make Ukraine a fortress ala Israel. And as you said, most probably that money would come from the money that the West stole from Russia lol

So for Russia, anything else than the 1st scenario is a disaster.
For China, with ample supplies affordable agricultural products and resources from Russia and Ukraine, it can now focus on the US hegemony, after reunification of the country.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Look at the twitter/clips/youtube vids of Ukrainian and Polish border guards beating up Indian and african students and forcing them to the back of the line and look at US new correspondenats consistently bemoan the fall of "white, european state" that woulld normally happen in browner countries but not 'civilised white nations'.
The global south sees as well.

How's that gonna pan out for a europe desperately needing the markets of the global south and the resources as well? The US as well despite hiding behind gunboat diplomacy?

Easy, just make sure the global south doesn’t see them, or if they do, distract them so they forget in a week.
 
Top