There are precedents that corroborate my conclusion. I'm not inventing non-existent scenarios.Let me summarize what you are saying. Your first paragraph is saying that China insisted on relying on the west even though there is the high risk of sanction coming. At the end, you critisize China for "doing" this. All your reason is because it is "obviously".
So what I see is that you are doing a strawman argument. First set a target purely based on your mind, then shoot at it. However your target isn't real, for every western item, there is a mirrored Chinese alternative in development. Russian alternative isn't different from Chinese alternative.
If you are right, then the only conclusion is that Chinese government is stupid to sell China's future to the west. TBH, I don't think you are here to some different perspective with us, but purely to make a propaganda, an usual tactic of pretending of being more caring for China than Chinese government, you may know the phrase "打着红旗反红旗".
The semiconductor industry was severely affected following sanctions and had many plans delayed. I just see the same pattern in the aviation industry.
If the US did this to Huawei and SMIC, so try to imagine what they can do to COMAC...
Obviously sanctions can be overcomed, but it would be the same problem that Huawei faces and that Russia also faces with the SJ-100 and MS-21. It is something that can be prevented without experiencing the same losses, even if it is delayed.
If China and Russia worked together they would certainly be able to overcome the Western monopoly sooner, instead of still paying large sums of money to Rolls-Royce and several other companies of the western MIC.