Chinese submarines thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roger604

Senior Member
Re: Chinese sub thread

^ I think you're right.

The consensus is that the first Type 094 was launched in 2004. If other PLAN acquisitions are a model, probably two were launched within a short period of time. Many sources (including ONI) also say Type 094 has been in serial production since 2007. So we're probably looking at 3 subs by now.
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Chinese sub thread

Here is the original article
党的十六大以来,我国自主创新取得了举世瞩目的成就,在一些重要领域取得突破性进展,与发达国家的技术差距进一步缩小,科技创新能力和综合实力明显增强,对经济社会发展的支撑和引领作用日益突出。总体上看,我国已成为对世界科技发展有重要影响的国家,科技事业发展进入重要跃升期。突出表现在:

资料图:中央电视台新闻中出现的战略核潜艇效果图

一、攻克了一批前沿技术和战略高技术的重大技术难题,为增强综合国力和维护国家安全提供了重要支撑。“神舟”系列飞船的成功发射,使我国成为世界上第三个有能力将人送上太空的国家。具有自主知识产权的高温气冷堆研制成功,使我国在新一代核能系统研究开发方面占据世界一席之地。高性能计算机、第三代移动通信、高速信息网络、超大规模集成电路、核心软件等方面打破了国外的技术垄断,缩小了与发达国家的技术差距。在人类功能基因组、水稻基因组、超级杂交水稻、抗虫棉、基因工程药物和疫苗等领域取得了一系列重大技术突破。在国防科技建设领域,取得了以“空警2000”、“094核潜艇”、“歼10”等为代表的一批重大自主创新成果。863计划在航天运输与空天平台技术、空间信息技术、激光技术等方面攻克了一批重大关键技术,形成了一批新概念武器装备和系统,实现了国防科技的整体跃升。形成了核、航天、航空、船舶、电子等军工特色的技术、产品和关联产业,带动了国民经济发展。
二、取得了一批能源资源等领域的重大技术成果,为缓解国民经济重大瓶颈制约提供了重要支撑。促进能源资源领域的技术进步,提高了能源利用效率,使我国以年均5.6%的能源消费增长,支撑了年均10.2%的经济增长。攻克了一批石油勘探开发技术难题,在陆相断陷盆地和海相碳酸盐勘探开发方面取得重大突破;在二次采油技术居世界领先水平,提高原油采收率20%以上。矿产资源勘探开发技术进步,提高了采选冶综合回收率和资源综合利用率;开发了一批大型煤液化工程成套设备,为改变我国液体燃料紧缺局面提供了支撑。基本掌握了第二代大型压水堆核电技术,其中高温气冷堆进入示范阶段,核聚变技术研究位居世界前列;在电动汽车以及燃料电池、太阳能、风能、水能、生物质能等新能源和替代能源领域取得一批重要技术创新成果,开辟了能源利用的新前景。
三、突破了一批农业领域的重大技术,为探索解决“三农”问题和推进社会主义新农村建设提供了重要支撑。开展新农村建设科技促进行动、加强县市和农村社区建设工作、星火富民工程、科技富民强县行动计划、科技特派员行动计划等,促进农业高技术和农业基础研究,大力发展现代农业,培育农业新兴产业和新经济增长点,为农业增产、农村和谐发展、农民增收等方面提供了科技支撑。在农作物育种、品种改良、重大病虫害防治和农业气象灾害监测预警方面取得重要进展,产生了两系法杂交水稻等一批重大农业技术成果,为我国粮食安全作出了重要贡献;相关技术和产品推广应用,每年可挽回粮食损失2500万吨、棉花40万吨、果品 330万吨、蔬菜2800万吨;攻克了一批农产品加工与食品安全保障的关键技术,为保障食品安全提供了有效的技术支撑;以保护性栽培耕作等技术为核心的黄淮海地区无公害优质玉米生产关键技术,农用化学品的使用量降低30%,残留污染降低60%以上,无公害产品率达到95%。
四、解决了一批经济社会可持续发展的重大技术问题,为建设环境友好型社会和构建社会主义和谐社会提供了重要支撑。重点攻克和解决了一批生态环境进化、生态资源保护和修复、环境污染综合治理调控、温室气体减排和全球气候变化等领域重大技术,初步探索出适合我国国情的水土流失、土地沙化、湖泊污染和城市环境质量改善的成套技术,有效缓解了持续干旱、森林和植被减少、北方沙尘天气等现象,遏制了太湖、滇池等主要河流、湖泊水污染加剧的趋势。实施区域可持续发展科技计划,城镇化建设、公共卫生、防灾减灾以及科技反恐和应对非传统安全等公共安全领域的科技工作明显增强。人口与健康领域科技进步显著,在心脏、肿瘤、脑血管等重大慢性疾病,在防治和防控肝炎、爱滋病、非典型性肺炎、禽流感等重大传染病,在生育和生殖、衰老机制等方面,相继取得重要突破,国民健康水平显著提高。
五、涌现出一批基础科学研究领域重大创新成果,为提高原始性创新能力作出了重要贡献。我国科学家在造血干细胞、蛋白质结构、脑与认知及神经科学、古生物学、基因和遗传科学等进展显著,非线性光学晶体、量子信息和通信、超强超短激光研究居世界前列,澄江动物群脊椎动物起源、热河生物群鸟演化、冶金过程精粒调控、多碳壁纳米管等研究取得重大突破。近年来,我国发表国际论文数以年均19%的速度递增,2006年我国国际论文数占世界论文数为7%,论文总数排名世界第4,与英、德、日相当,其中纳米领域论文数量已居世界第2。近10年,我国论文质量和国际影响不断提高,发表国际论文被引用次数上升到世界第13 位,其中材料、化学等领域论文被引用次数居世界前10位,物质、生命和工程科学等领域论文数占世界比例超过5%;2204-2006年,我国科研人员在国际顶尖的《科学》、《自然》和《细胞》杂志共发表文章220篇。
六、形成了一批具有自主知识产权和市场竞争力的产品,为我国在国际竞争中赢得先机奠定了基础。五年来,我国在专利、技术标准等方面取得重要进展。一是专利数量世界排名快速提升,原创性技术突破迅速增加。专利申请量以年均18%的速度增长;国内专利申请总量为128.5万件,比“九五”期间高出 147.6%;授权总量为68.4万件,比“九五”期间高出一倍。二是一些重要领域填补了标准战略与政策方面的空白,对维护产业技术安全起到积极促进作用。在信息、生物、电动汽车、农产品加工、食品安全等领域,相继完成近100项国家标准和行业标准,推进了技术标准体系建设,支持企业创新成果形成国家标准或国际标准等。三是通过实施12个重大科技专项,使我国在信息技术、清洁能源汽车等领域取得多项重大技术突破,共申请国内外专利和软件著作权近2000 项,开发新产品、新材料1200多项,形成技术标准700多项,形成了一批有自主知识产权和市场竞争力的产品。
七、建立了一批国家高新技术产业基地,为促进区域经济增长、调整产业结构作出了重要贡献。高举“火炬”计划的旗帜,高新区创新和创业环境和自主创新能力得到明显改善和提高。53个国家高新区工业增加值占全国工业企业工业增加值的9%,占所在城市工业增加值的比重达到20%以上的有31个,达到40%以上的有7个;拥有发明专利近1.5万项,超过70%的产品技术源于区内企业;区内企业研究开发经费总额达到802亿元,其中高新技术企业研究开发经费占产品销售收入的比例达到2.79%。现有生产力促进中心1324家,位居世界第一,服务企业总数9万家;国家科技企业孵化器500余家,与美国相当,形成一批软件、集成电路设计等专业孵化器;国家大学科技园62个,在孵企业近5000家,转化科技成果近3000项,提供就业岗位7万余个。
八、深化了科技体制改革,适应社会主义市场经济体制的国家创新体系初步形成。一是以建立企业为主体、产学研相结合的技术创新体系为突破口,实施“技术创新引导工程”,开展企业技术创新试点工作,在企业设立国家重点实验室、建立工程技术中心等,使企业成为技术创新的主要力量。目前,我国企业研发投入占全社会研发投入比例接近70%,企业掌握自主知识产权数量迅速增加,以企业为主开发的重大技术成果不断涌现,形成了华为、海尔、中兴、奇瑞等一批自主创新型企业。二是高等院校成为自主创新的一支生力军。高校拥有两院院士总数的50%左右,国家实验室60%建在高等院校,承担了全国总数42%的“973”计划任务。三是国家科研机构的骨干引领作用进一步增强。应用开发类科研院所转制后面向市场的创新能力得到提高,一支服务于国家目标的社会公益类研究力量加速形成。
九、扩大了国际科技合作的空间和舞台,全方位、多层次、广领域、高水平的国际科技合作格局基本形成。我国已与152个国家和地区建立了科技合作关系,与其中 99个国家的相关部门签订了政府间科技合作协定,形成了较为完整的政府间科技合作框架。积极组织国际重大合作项目,先后参与了国际热核聚变实验堆研究计划、伽利略全球卫星导航计划等国际大科学工程和计划,有效服务于国家需求,使我国在一些重点领域紧跟国际前沿,为解决国民经济发展的一些重大技术瓶颈提供了有效支撑。
十、建设了一支规模宏大的科技人才队伍,为加强自主创新、建设创新型国家奠定了坚实基础。2005年,科技人力资源总量3500万人,位居世界第一位;全时R&D人员136.5万人年,位居世界第二位。“十五”期间,我国R&D人员总量增加了44.3万人年,年均增长8.2%,约为“九五”期间年均增长率的二倍;R&D科学家工程师总量年均增长9.98%;我国承担973、863计划的青年科研人员和归国人员均提高到半数以上,归国留学人员以年均13%速度持续增长,企业研发人员占全国研发人员总数的比例已超过60%,全国45岁以下中青年科研人员占研究队伍总人数的近80%,一支以中青年科学家为中坚力量、老中青相结合的科技人才格局基本形成。(稿件来源:中央国家机关工委宣传部组织编写的《“赞颂新成就、喜迎十七大”活页文选》)
btw, it was posted here,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

but for some reason I accessed it here from work this afternoon, but can't access it from home now.

Basically, didn't say much about it accept acknowledging its existence and listed its importance with KJ-2000 and J-10. From that, I think it's probably already achieved IOC.

As for the sub launching missile picture, there is a little more to it. The reason why it's said to be SAM is because on the CCTV program that showed this clip, it mentionned that the "air defense has improved" as the submarine was launching that missile. And the program was on conventional subs I think.
 

fishhead

Banned Idiot
Re: Chinese sub thread

Here is the original article

btw, it was posted here,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

but for some reason I accessed it here from work this afternoon, but can't access it from home now.

The link doesn't work for me neither, seems that they deleted it. BTW, it's the Water Resource Ministry page so somebody without knowing much may just post part of that internal document and it spreads all over the internet.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Re: Chinese sub thread

I had an impression it was probably one of those QW class MANPAD missiles being shot through one of the tubes in a Song's sail, which is mighty big for a small sub.

Addendum.

Looking at the sequence here, its a Song but I'm not sure if its a SAM. Like it was hitting a ship or something.
 
Last edited:

evereachyu

Banned Idiot
President Inspect The New Sub?

14241293.html
What do you think?
14241293.html
 
Last edited:

sinowarrior

Junior Member
Re: Chinese sub thread

^ Wow, an official government release saying that Type 094 as big a step for Chinese technology as J-10 and KJ-2000.

We know how advanced J-10 is -- it compares very well with the world's cutting edge fighters. This suggests PLAN is very happy with Type 094 and it probably compares very well with Ohio, Vanguard and Le Triomphant classes. The latter two uses pump jet, so there's a good chance Type 094 does too.

The priority for air force was J-10, army WZ123, second art DF-31 and Navy 094, both J-10 and WZ123 projects were modified quite extensively, especially if one looks at the difference between 98 and 99G, and since J-10 and 99G aren’t too far behind from their Western or Russian counterpart, it is possible that the entire 094 project is far advanced than most people have realized.
Also it was 094 rather than 093 that became the top priority of the navy at least from early 90s; this timeframe suggests the design on 094 was parallel with the 093 project, rather than a follow up based on the 093 project, since it is unlikely for the design of 093 to be finalized in early 90s. Therefore there is a possibility that 094 was designed independently like typhoon or Ohio rather than based on the design of 093, which suggest that the boomer program was far advanced then most of people believed.

Alternatively if 093 was indeed finalized during early 90s and the priority shifted to 094 after it and the old two-phase nuclear submarine development plan was followed, then the first 093 prototype could be launched as early as mid 90s, and like WZ123 J-10 even 039, a subsequent but radical redesign production model was introduced, and this explains the different 093 pictures that exist on the web. If this scenario is true, then the actual capability of 093 or 093G could be far superior to what most western analyst expected. Regardless it could be safe to conclude that PLA made some great leap in its nuclear subs technology just like in J-10 and WZ123’s case.
 

fishhead

Banned Idiot
Re: Chinese sub thread

From all the signs shown recently, my conclusion is that 094 SSBN is a done deal now. How many hulls deployed or will be deployed? We don't know, but I am pretty sure it is not like Xia - 092.

From the past interview with 092's chief designer, 092 is something for Chinese of "having or not having", it's used as the testbed and not much of practical combat meaning, since its missile leg is too short(not just noise). At the celebration of successful launch of JL-1 in 1987, the daughter of Marshall Nie(leader of the defence R&D) asked the chief what he thought, he replied: I worried "my job security". And his worry came true, Deng stopped the Chinese SSBN program, and that idle lasted almost 10 years until Jiang decided that Chinese SSBN program must continue(never stop again).

So 094 program started around middle of 1990, but we didn't see much Chinese break through in sub technology until around 2000, also nearly 10 years idle make SSBN program lose many valuable people(most of them went to the civilian nuclear program). Then I don't see how advance the 094 would be, the losing experience and too late of incoperating the new technology tell 094 is just so so. It only makes Chinese have real sea based nuclear strike capability but not much anything else. Its deployment number will not be many I think.

The real ace will come with 096 and I believe they're working on it, 094 is just the transition program.
 

sinowarrior

Junior Member
Re: Chinese sub thread

094 program started earlier than mid 90s, my granddad was working for COSTIND, with the daughter of Marshall Nie and her husband who was the head of COSTIND, and he said the program had been top priority for navy for a while, and he said that around mid 90s, also during that period, the sub school was actully in control of the navy, and quite a bit of navy founding was devoted to the boomers, whereas other project such 052B/C, song was not the top of the list. from what i have heard, i do not think most of nuke engineers went to civilan sectors at all. since the top priority means the entire program will be kept running at full speed even if other programs were cancalled or postponed, so DF-31 was kept alive whereas Df-41 was cancelled. it is also interesting to note J-10,WZ123,DF-31 all had its first prototype around 99, and entired batch production with radical modifications in the early 21 century.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top