Chinese semiconductor thread II

antiterror13

Brigadier
from a scientific perspective, it will be harder. it is simply a fact that even with comparable atomic absorption cross section, Sn is a solid, and Xe is a gas. That means atomic density of the Sn target is on the order of 1000x higher.

Nonetheless there are Xe based EUV sources in R&D:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

There was a 20 year old design for liquid Xe jet based LPP EUV:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This eliminates problems with debris, but presents problems with cryogenic cooling.

Is there any other metal that can achieve better than Sn ?
 

spaceship9876

New Member
Registered Member
Intel's market cap is typically in the range of $150 billion to $200 billion, making it one of the largest semiconductor companies. Qualcomm's market cap is generally lower, around $100 billion, which would pose a challenge for a direct acquisition without significant financial maneuvers.
intel's market cap is $93bn. Qualcomm's is $188bn.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Intel's market cap is typically in the range of $150 billion to $200 billion, making it one of the largest semiconductor companies. Qualcomm's market cap is generally lower, around $100 billion, which would pose a challenge for a direct acquisition without significant financial maneuvers.
huhhhh

Intel market caps is relatively very small right now, much lower than Qualcomm
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


1726912005210.png
 

Schmoe

New Member
Registered Member
My Googlefeed yesterday had the first few lines of a Techinisghts story that China's (unspecified) DUV machine cannot execute multipatterning and is unable to produce 28nm and smaller nodes. Techinsights website today does not appear to have that story, nor did Google searches reveal it. Did anybody see that story? Did Techinsights withdraw it?
 

huemens

Junior Member
Registered Member
My Googlefeed yesterday had the first few lines of a Techinisghts story that China's (unspecified) DUV machine cannot execute multipatterning and is unable to produce 28nm and smaller nodes. Techinsights website today does not appear to have that story, nor did Google searches reveal it. Did anybody see that story? Did Techinsights withdraw it?

That was not Techinsights. It was a DigiTimes article.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't have the full text, but most likely it is just a pointless article about the 65nm DUV, as they have been writing various articles about it whole week.
 
Last edited:
Top