I am really questioning whether people on this forum are actually following this issue at all"We definitely can't get 3nm, we can't get 5nm, “It would be great if we could solve 7 nanometers,” he admitted. ”
“我们肯定是得不到 3nm,肯定得不到 5nm,我们能解决 7nm 就非常非常好。”
We certainly cannot get 3nm, and certainly not 5nm, it's very good that we can solved 7nm (problem).
1) "definitely cannot get 3nm, 5nm" = cannot purchase 3nm, 5nm (from Taiwan, US). It is not the same as we cannot produce 3nm. 5nm in China in future.
2) "We definitely can't get 3nm, we can't get 5nm, “It would be great if we could solve 7 nanometers,” he admitted. ” is not the same as " it's very good that we can solved 7nm (problem).". Fact: Pura 70.
Correct interpretation is important. We may see Huawei 5nm chip before end of this year.
just last year, we had the same huawei deny 5g phones saying something along the line of unable to produce 5g phones without American permission
That was only a couple of months before mate 60 came out
so who in their right mind is still wasting time interpreting what some Hussein person says?
I actually don’t think they can get to n5 without euv. Maybe they get to density level comparable to Samsung lpp4 in 2 years.
but since euv project itself is under most high security clearance, we don’t hear about it other than from people close to huawei.
now if we go back to the original topic, interpreting this comment from huawei is pointless. Keep this in mind the next time you see something like this gets posted in the future