Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
"Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment saw sales drop by 0.2 per cent to 702 million yuan in the same period."

SMEE's sales are actually dropping. Meanwhile ASML's sales are up 37% year on year. China's not only not catching up in the past year, it's falling further behind.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Those different things and different types of sales, ASML is selling EUVL machines and DUVi machines while SMEE sales are from other types of lithography machines, packaging , mems, TFT that ASML doesn't even make and some are from their Krf and the I-line litho machines. For now Canon is the main competition of SMEE but when their immersion machine is ready for production and with the help of US sanctions, ASML will be their main competitor in the near future. Hopefully.
 

Pkp88

Junior Member
Registered Member
I love how selectively people can read a neutral story in a Chinese website and write an article making it look worse than it is. He complete it ignore this part.


That is a huge growth in my opinion. That means they are growing pretty fast.




"China-made lithography equipment has not entered wafer mass production lines", I think SMEE 28nm ArfI lithography machines is being tested and verification but not in production (Yet). Another issue is that ASML position in China is too strong for a change, even in China institutions like ICRD, they will be a lot of inertia of moving away from ASML unless the pressure from the U.S. become unbearable.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Don't disagree there's some secondary equipment being used cleaning, EDA etc... but I am a bit surprised at the situation on Lithography. At legacy nodes there's no excuse why a device isn't being used for mass production if you have that capability.
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
Don't disagree there's some secondary equipment being used cleaning, EDA etc... but I am a bit surprised at the situation on Lithography. At legacy nodes there's no excuse why a device isn't being used for mass production if you have that capability.
You can only produce so many machines in a year. We are talking about a nation that needs to scale up VS a block that has scaled up for decades.

And only recently China was forced to scale up capacity and tech.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
"Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment saw sales drop by 0.2 per cent to 702 million yuan in the same period."

SMEE's sales are actually dropping. Meanwhile ASML's sales are up 37% year on year. China's not only not catching up in the past year, it's falling further behind.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
That's obviously not how it works; you're pretending that both have mature products and are competing in sales. Actually, ASML is and was always in the mature product sale phase while SMEE is in the technological advancement phase (when it comes to important machines anyway). Basically, if you were funding your research into aerospace by selling small gadgets and in 2 years, you went from foam glider to jet prototype while your gadget business stagnated and Boeing saw a sales increase, it doesn't mean you are falling further behind Boeing; it means you have successfully put yourself on the map and narrowed the technological gap.
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
I love how selectively people can read a neutral story in a Chinese website and write an article making it look worse than it is. He complete it ignore this part.


That is a huge growth in my opinion. That means they are growing pretty fast.




"China-made lithography equipment has not entered wafer mass production lines", I think SMEE 28nm ArfI lithography machines is being tested and verification but not in production (Yet). Another issue is that ASML position in China is too strong for a change, even in China institutions like ICRD, they will be a lot of inertia of moving away from ASML unless the pressure from the U.S. become unbearable.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
That agreement with the ICRD dates back to 2017.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Don't disagree there's some secondary equipment being used cleaning, EDA etc... but I am a bit surprised at the situation on Lithography. At legacy nodes there's no excuse why a device isn't being used for mass production if you have that capability.
The latecomer dilemma, by the time SMEE launched their FrontEnd lithography machines in 2016-2017 the market was already monopolized by ASML. Most companies are accustomed to ASML and they are not going to change for the sake of patriotism. Now the sanctions have changed that, if SMIC does not have access to ASML machines it means that they must collaborate with SMEE to develop lithography machines and ensure its future. In theory is the same thing that happened with ASML and TSMC, they helped each other. Again, hopefully
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
@Yukiolweipqled51 bro if you have the time Please read the entire thread, 28nm had been fully indigenized , next year 14nm. So from these 2 nodes alone we can say China achieved self sufficiency, and from 14nm going to 7nm is much easier (the jump from 28nm planar to 14nm FinFet is huge) cause they share the same equipment with some tweaks. I'm no expert BUT I'm lucky that some of our esteem members like @WTAN , @Oldschool , @tokenanalyst ,@FairAndUnbiased and @krautmeister had the patience to explain in layman terms a very technical Jargon and I'm grateful cause I learn a lot and I hope you too. It's Free and save you a lot of money instead of attending an engineering course...lol
Read the entire thread?!? Anyway... He is new member... It might be necessary if his is not too familiar with lithography and the state of the Chinese semiconductor industry in general. My field is mechanical engineering... It is from this thread and others such as the one started by the infamous Tidal Wave that I familiarized myself with the basics and a little more with regards IC chip manufacturing processes, especially with regards to lithography. Reading from this and related threads and using this and other threads as a basis to do google and YouTube research.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
The latecomer dilemma, by the time SMEE launched their FrontEnd lithography machines in 2016-2017 the market was already monopolized by ASML. Most companies are accustomed to ASML and they are not going to change for the sake of patriotism. Now the sanctions have changed that, if SMIC does not have access to ASML machines it means that they must collaborate with SMEE to develop lithography machines and ensure its future. In theory is the same thing that happened with ASML and TSMC, they helped each other. Again, hopefully
Indeed. The GTA semi fab ( the most advanced automotive and power machinery IGBT and IC fab in China) acquired an ASML DUV Lithography machine in 2020.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Indeed. The GTA semi fab ( the most advanced automotive and power machinery IGBT and IC fab in China) acquired an ASML DUV Lithography machine in 2020.
The irony is that power ICs (IGBT, SIC, GaN) are closer to military applications than SMIC ICs, they are putting themselves at high risk of sanctions by becoming dependent on U.S. equipment. I know ASML is not from the U.S. but the Arf excimers lasers are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top