I watched through that clip. Some of it seems nonsensical to me, but other stuffs made more sense
Like D0 = 0.3 -> 72% yield and start off at 0.6 - 50% yield. That seems plausible assumption on his part
earliest phones likely using earliest 9000S. I also subscribe to the theory that Mate 60 likely get the best made 9000S. Ones produced with more bad transistors are used for Nova 12 & MatePad Pro or something like that. I think semianalysis talked about binning, well I think there were some binning going on here, but the lower bin gets left over to lower end phones.
The breakdown in component area bw 9000 and 9000S is interesting
CPU took more space. Likely because you needed more space to get more transistors into those big cores where density is lower (HP density that he talked about). I wonder if this is something they can improve over time. @latenlazy I'm did it this way because they found it to achieve the highest performance to be a little less dense, but I wonder if the lower density hurts power consumption
GPU was a little smaller also using their own Maleeon design. He measured it to 1536 GFLOPS iirc (not sure how they got to that).
To put things in perspective, A17 does 2.15 TFLOPS. So A17's GPU is 40% more powerful
the structure is unique, different from Cuda, Mali, IMG & Andreno. Which is great, since in the event that those gets cut off, it's important Huawei can still produce this
ISP being 2x size makes sense, since the support for HDR Vivid. Very important for MatePad Pro
Modem also interesting since its area shrunk significantly with 4G/5G combined. Another support for Hisilicon's quality that they are able to improve performance by combining the two and shrinking real estate
Like D0 = 0.3 -> 72% yield and start off at 0.6 - 50% yield. That seems plausible assumption on his part
earliest phones likely using earliest 9000S. I also subscribe to the theory that Mate 60 likely get the best made 9000S. Ones produced with more bad transistors are used for Nova 12 & MatePad Pro or something like that. I think semianalysis talked about binning, well I think there were some binning going on here, but the lower bin gets left over to lower end phones.
The breakdown in component area bw 9000 and 9000S is interesting
CPU took more space. Likely because you needed more space to get more transistors into those big cores where density is lower (HP density that he talked about). I wonder if this is something they can improve over time. @latenlazy I'm did it this way because they found it to achieve the highest performance to be a little less dense, but I wonder if the lower density hurts power consumption
GPU was a little smaller also using their own Maleeon design. He measured it to 1536 GFLOPS iirc (not sure how they got to that).
To put things in perspective, A17 does 2.15 TFLOPS. So A17's GPU is 40% more powerful
the structure is unique, different from Cuda, Mali, IMG & Andreno. Which is great, since in the event that those gets cut off, it's important Huawei can still produce this
ISP being 2x size makes sense, since the support for HDR Vivid. Very important for MatePad Pro
Modem also interesting since its area shrunk significantly with 4G/5G combined. Another support for Hisilicon's quality that they are able to improve performance by combining the two and shrinking real estate