But...but the AMERICAN EXPERT said China can only produce only a “very small” volume of 7nm chips.There are rumors that they can sale 15-17million units of Mate 60 or even 20m. That's the same amount as of the best series Mate 30.
But...but the AMERICAN EXPERT said China can only produce only a “very small” volume of 7nm chips.There are rumors that they can sale 15-17million units of Mate 60 or even 20m. That's the same amount as of the best series Mate 30.
Looks like TechInsights have already given some info to Bloomberg.
Full article:
absolutely notI apologize if this has been mentioned before, but do we know if SMIC's N+2 process uses indigenous lithography systems?
You mean Kunpeng CPUs? Hisilicon KunPeng-920 was launched 4 and half years ago.Hisilicon PC chip will be online at year end, substitutes INTEL
this chip will be running with HongMeng PC version. secretly developed with 2000
people.
Actually, it most likely uses NXT 2050i and/or 2100i as part of process that also uses 1980i.NO it used ASML NXT 1980i or NXT 2000i. TSMC N7 the first generation 7nm was produced using NXT 1980i.
You mean Zhang Rujing aka Richard Chang?
Empyrean said earlier this year they fully cover 7nm EDA & it even covers some 5nm node. I don't know why people keep on giving HW credit for everything.Cannot open the link, but I found an introductory article directly from .
It seems confirmed that Huawei's Kirin 9000s is built on SMIC’s N+2 7nm process, this is an improved version of last year N+1 that was used on crypto chip Minerva, in particular in N+2 has been added embedded SRAM integration (and I think Techinsights will find also other improvements in their analysis).
Mainly now SMIC can fabricate any kind of logic chip at 7nm. This is huge!
We still don't know the capacity, but if Huawei put Mate 60 Pro on sell in the open market, I'd expect to be a sensible volume, they cannot push such a new chip (with all the related buzz) with only tiny number of Kirin 9000s available.
Regarding the Kirin 9000s, I've been mostly impressed by the new and original IP on the GPU. Considering that is fully new and that graphic drivers need years (not months) of polishing to squeeze the last drop of performance out of a new GPU, we can assume graphic performance will increase sensibly when drivers mature.
It would be odd if Huawei invested the huge amount of time/resources/money needed to develop a new GPU IP just for smartphones, we can realistically expect that GPU will be ported on PC, and that is a huge thing. Currently in China there is only Moore Threads to fight against Nvidia/AMD, but is really a David against Goliath fight....probably in the future also big brother will enter the battlefield.
EDIT: another point I want to mention is the maturity of the EDA software!
Huawei cannot use US EDA trio (Cadence, Synopsys, Mentor graphic), so they had to design the chip using localized software. Not only this, also the hardware libraries used by SMIC to import the design must have been fully developed in China. This is a big news by itself: now is confirmed that exists a full EDA ecosystem, from design to masks, to foundry, able to develop a chip as complex as the Kirin 9000s, i.e. at the state of the art, regarding the needed EDA tools.
Sir Huawei is the end user customer, without them whom would SMIC FAB those chip, and I may add the customers usually set the spec parameters and requirements. The reason why Apple the Customer, TSMC the Fabricator and ASML the equipment maker are such a formidable team, Their synergism is a wonder to behold.When are you going to finally give SMIC some respect after spending years hailing Huawei as the driving force for everything?
your continued lack of respect for SMIC is astonishingSir Huawei is the end user customer, without them whom would SMIC FAB those chip, and I may add the customers usually set the spec parameters and requirements. The reason why Apple the Customer, TSMC the Fabricator and ASML the equipment maker are such a formidable team, Their synergism is a wonder to behold.
I mean each fab has their own IPs. They already did a teardown of N+1 process so they know what SMIC FinFet architecture & feature set looks likeHow does techinsights know that Huawei is using SMIC?
To me it makes perfect sense for Huawei to have ownership over their fabs. They are big enough and SMIC risks losing their existing US customers and suppliers by being associated directly with Huawei.
ASML has a license to send three more advanced tools — using deep ultraviolet technology — to China by the end of the year.
Empyrean said earlier this year they fully cover 7nm EDA & it even covers some 5nm node. I don't know why people keep on giving HW credit for everything.
News hit some of them so hard that they skipped anger and went straight for bargaining.A copium article from Washington Post
I read it for you so you don't have to...the only interesting data point and the reason of this post is this:
So regarding the news of last week of a license extension of Dutch government for ASML, we are talking of 3 new machines to be sent to China (maybe to SMIC itself).
Yes, I remember that news on Empyrean, sorry not to mention them. I didn't mean Huawei made all by itself....
...but Huawei has a special role in this tech war, a unique, single, very critical role that nobody else has. It's not by chance that Trump choose Huawei as the one to "punish" to "educate" the other hundred...and it is not only out of the will of its owner that Huawei is fiercely and proudly fighting back since 5 years now.
There is a huge symbolic meaning on this Huawei company, both for US and China.
SMIC, they are very brave, I admire them, not only for the very big technical achievement but also because they accepted to be part of this "clash of titans". Now they are even more exposed to US fury, anything can happen, including banning on materials, US customers, etc..but they know this for sure and accepted this.