Are there any Chinese companies that produced analog chips?
Are there any Chinese companies that produced analog chips?
This company makes NAND and NOR Flash for embedded purposes.What "1xnm NAND Flash" means?
Interesting that they focus on SLC NAND ? why not MLC (2, 3 or 4 bits) that use mostly by all of us ?
Who needs SLC NAND ?
Those countries are so small, doesn't really matter. Vast majority of tools are spent by Taiwan, Korea, china and us. The last one is a no go for china. So the greatest growth for NAURA would be:they don't necessarily need to 100% kick foreign companies out of the Chinese market. Russia and Brazil are tooling up semiconductor industries as we speak. Its all about tools. Sell the tools to Russia and Brazil with a high market share for the products they need to support their domestic industries which need analog/power/RF chips, and they will be plugged into the Chinese industrial system and serve as a tool market.
Chinese semiconductor fab market serving domestic + ASEAN is already huge, but LATAM and CSTO are hugely underserved markets that would be much better served by Brazilian and Russian fabs than by direct Chinese imports. If Russian + Brazilian semiconductor equipment market is ~$8 billion per year combined starting out with ~10 mature node fabs + $1 billion per year combined maintaining, and Chinese suppliers get ~90% of that, it takes alot of pressure off the domestic front, and I believe that Chinese suppliers can be the most cost effective for a new-build, medium volume 180 nm fab.
This will also kick in right as Chinese equipment builders get scaled up in the next 3-4 years.
This chart is off I think for some. You can Google asm international revenue for 2022 and it is 2.4 billion euros.This is top 10 semiconductor equipment manufactures ranking by revenue for 2022
View attachment 111047
NO. 10 Teradyne's 2022 revenue was $3.155B = RMB 21.6B
So Chinese companies still need time to get in top 10 ranking
South Korea is a rival with SEMES. There's also the risk of being banned. It is always better to open new markets than try to squeeze into a crowded existing market because there's literally no competition when you create a new market. That is also how Chinese companies have historically expanded: take domestic market share, create new developing country markets, then finally, take over developed markets or get banned from them. And if banned, then start eroding adversary market shares everywhere outside their home market.Those countries are so small, doesn't really matter. Vast majority of tools are spent by Taiwan, Korea, china and us. The last one is a no go for china. So the greatest growth for NAURA would be:
1) to get more business from tsmc and Samsung
2) domestic fabs having aggressive growth on the advanced node market. Think about it $16 billion from ymtc for phase 2. More growth by smic is the other one. They got probably $6 to $10b a year of capex for the next 5 years. And of course, other Chinese fabs are growing too.
So expand the china pie and get into more of that korea and Taiwan pie.
This chart is off I think. You can Google asm international revenue for 2022 and it is 2.4 billion euros.
I'm the one that wrote the Seeking Alpha article May 18, 2022 on SMIC reaching 7nm (2 months before TechInsights, and you can read it here:I'm pretty sure the so called expert doesnt browse Chinese net i.e. Baidu/WeChat in mandarin instead of Google.
I asked @hvpc about something like this actually. I wonder if you need to get someone with r&d than cxmt into dram. As seen in tencent example, dram speed really makes a difference. You also don't want to lose all that revenue to Koreans. So while smic has bigger fish to fry, I wonder if smic or Huawei can get in here and move things forward. Of course, also need domestic toolmakers to improve a lot.This company makes NAND and NOR Flash for embedded purposes.
This is basically old style planar Flash memory. They do not have their own fabs, they basically design specialty memory and fab it someplace. Like at SMIC.
SLC memory is required when you need more reliability even if at the cost of density. If you want density, today you have V-NAND anyway, so planar MLC isn't quite what it used to be.
1xnm NAND Flash is likely planar flash with equivalent density to something in the tens of nanometers range.
Huawei has no experience in DRAM. The business model of an IDM is very different than a foundry, and IDMs for captive internal customers is very different than an IDM for selling to external OEMs. IDMs for internal consumption - like what Huawei wants to do - is less cost sensitive and can accept some inefficiencies, because the costs can be built into the final product sold. Nobody will notice an extra $50 on a $10k base station or an extra $2-3 on a $500 smartphone, but a marginal profit change +/- $2 per chip is gigantic for a foundry. Tool depreciation for an internal IDM is also very different than a foundry, as you can't afford to keep buying new tools to upgrade and offload old tools onto legacy fabs, you don't have the volume.I asked @hvpc about something like this actually. I wonder if you need to get someone with r&d than cxmt into dram. As seen in tencent example, dram speed really makes a difference. You also don't want to lose all that revenue to Koreans. So while smic has bigger fish to fry, I wonder if smic or Huawei can get in here and move things forward. Of course, also need domestic toolmakers to improve a lot.
This is top 10 semiconductor equipment manufactures ranking by revenue for 2022
View attachment 111047
NO. 10 Teradyne's 2022 revenue was $3.155B = RMB 21.6B
So Chinese companies still need time to get in top 10 ranking