more info on android supporting risc-v here:
Information free paper with lots of words and little else. No specific people saying anything and no specific new policy except a laughably ineffective one and shows a massive misunderstanding of the semiconductor industry (raw material costs are not the main cost driver).bloomberg article about china pausing major chip investments. Most of the article is behind a paywall, but from what can be read, it seems that the investments didnt get the results that they wanted. Does anyone knows about this?
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. reported earnings results for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. For the nine months, the company reported sales was CNY 10,012.3 million compared to CNY 6,173.37 million a year ago.
Net income was CNY 1,686.1 million compared to CNY 658.3 million a year ago.
I wrote this article and put it online yesterday. It didn't reference me so I'm attaching the link to the original. Let me know your thoughts:The planned fab expansions in China equate to 1,334kwpm which will almost double the current wafer capacity (1,665kwpm) and add 6% to the global wafer capacity.
View attachment 104336
View attachment 104337
Here's the article:
It doesn't contain any new information, just exaggerated fearmongering.
In my humble opinion, the problem with the Chip investment fund has less to do with corruption (this is a problem with every government guidance fund in China and it's really just a convenient excuse to blame officials) than with the fact that most of the money went into fabs as opposed to the equipment makers - a big strategic blunder, but only with the benefit of hindsight because realistically no one saw these harsh sanctions on equipment and design software coming - many thought it impossible, given China's huge semiconductors market - but the Biden administration still went its own way against the wishes of industry leaders and its allies.
According to this Guosen securities report, only 1.2% of the funds went into supporting domestic equipment makers, 1.4% went into materials companies, and the lion's share (70%) went to fabs and design companies. It did help expand production capacity but solved almost none of the bottleneck problems facing China's IC industry. That's why companies like U-Precision aren't getting any.
Honestly, people should be thankful that SMEE is going through these trials and tribulations. It means they aren't just doing this as a check the box, met the letter of the project requirements kind of deliverable to take in the government subsidies (this happens everywhere) but they actually intend for it to be commercially viable in HVM. With so many moving pieces, you cannot expect everything to align perfectly in the first go. If anything, it lays a good foundation going forward. These kind of projects are all iterative and gradual, you should not expect any sort of great leap forward.I think people need to calm down again. I'm really annoyed to see this level of constant hyperventilation. Clearly, someone from SMEE cannot spell everything out for everyone. And frankly, I doubt any of us would understand it if he did. He does not seem to be concerned about mass production of this first generation DUVi machine. Which to me indicates that the project's success does not depend on U-precision piece for at least mass production of SSA800. So, please calm down everyone. The far more important step is having SMIC and others to do their validation of the production prototype and then to raise the production.
One possibility is that SMEE is using a different work stage for their current prototypes. Another possibility is that SMEE is using U-Precision stages but these are pilot or prototype builds. R&D itself is not complete until you’ve finished *all* testing needed to meet some requirement standard or certification and you are not making any further changes to the initial production run. Sometimes products can still be finishing R&D, especially under verification or validation testing, while production run and customer delivery has already started, because observation of performance under customer adoption is necessary to complete the testing requirements before you can comfortably lock a design for production.I'm surprised the usual trolls in this thread haven't posted this yet. Someone asked havok
To which he replied
This makes no sense to me. How is it that SMEE has at the very least a beta of a 28nm DUVi while U-Precision's immersion dual-stage workpiece is still in R&D and furthermore, the R&D funds have run out?
Just what is going on here? I expected China's semiconductor tool drive to be an Apollo moonshot or a Manhattan Project, this is a three-ring circus.
As I have been saying for years in this thread, the most time consuming part of product development is always testing and reliability improvements. This is the stuff that people need to have more patience for. The fact that they don’t need to employ immature technology for emergency use is a sign that that you don’t need to do the job quick because there’s headroom to do the job well.Honestly, people should be thankful that SMEE is going through these trials and tribulations. It means they aren't just doing this as a check the box, met the letter of the project requirements kind of deliverable to take in the government subsidies (this happens everywhere) but they actually intend for it to be commercially viable in HVM. With so many moving pieces, you cannot expect everything to align perfectly in the first go. If anything, it lays a good foundation going forward. These kind of projects are all iterative and gradual, you should not expect any sort of great leap forward.