Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

antiterror13

Brigadier
That's odd,why would SMIC needs to assuring their US customers that SMIC meets regulations?Because the US regulation is all about selling to Chinese fabs,not buying from Chinese fabs. US entities can buy 3nm chips from SMIC if SMIC can make it,and it's totally legit under current US regulation.

Thats correct until the big bully change the rule randomly overnight
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
"If, in the eyes of the US, the Netherlands intervenes too little to limit the export of advanced chip machines to China, the US will have a trump card. Through a so -called foreign direct rule, the US can prohibit the export of American-made parts. Both ASML and ASM International machines contain some parts that are made in the US."
It is time for countries to absolutely get rid any American made parts and any parts made with American made machines that they seek to export to other countries... A likely upside of some sort is that it will provide some additional employment for people in their own countries instead of those in the United States.
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
I don't necessarily agree with that. The head of "02 project" recently explained this quite well. China is looking to create a new ecosystem that's not subject to US sanctions. It wants to cooperate with rest of the world. As such, even when SMEE is comfortably producing 100 DUVs a year, there is still a place in the Chinese market for ASML. As such, it doesn't want to be banned by anyone else. It's actually quite insulting.
Cooperation is desirable, but it does not have to be mandatory and pined for, because too strong such a desire leaves one at the mercy of fickle external actors who cannot be trusted in any way...
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
Take for example, Nikon also have immersion system that uses the same Cymer/Gigaphoton lasers, have good hardwares, and even could match ASML specification under test conditions. So why does ASML have 90% of immersion market share while Nikon ships less than 10 systems per year? Like I said before, the devil is in the details beyond the hardware. So even if SMEE could come up with scanners that could match ASML's tool specification, they will most likely to be simply close to where Nikon is relative to ASML. Same logic applies to integrated domestic EUV system relative to ASML's HVM systems.

It seems ASML has been better at marketing and building business relationships that go beyond immediate product sales.

Are Japanese dry DUV and wet DUV machines that much more inferior and so much more expensive than the ones of ASML that fabs refuse to buy them on the basis of much less quality and/or much higher cost?

Another thing is that the number over the years as IC chips have become more sophisticated there have been dwindling numbers of them involved in the production of the more sophisticated IC chips. Back in 2002 and 2003, there were 26 prominent IC chip making companies at 130 nm, which was the leading or near leading edge then. That means there was lots and lots of market choice for IC chip equipment makers. Today there's just 3 companies that make 10 nm and just 2 that make 7 nm or less. Nikon and Canon are out of those two markets, and even for the more mature nodes of 32 to 14 nm, ASML has come to dominate provision of lithographic equipment to fabs that make chips of those nodes.

If SMEE can produce DUV equipment comparable in quality to those of Japanese companies, it is likely that they will have a captive market in China for Chinese fabs making chips of nodes more mature than 7 nm because of the great pressure that the United States is placing on companies from US aligned countries not to sell chip making equipment to China of 28 nm and less mature ones.

Why wait until the bridge finally breaks when you see that it is heavily cracking before using another just as effective by-bass to your destination that won't break? Chinese companies do not have to wait until ASML finally succumbs to American pressures not to sell it's DUV equipment to China to purchase DUV equipment from SMEE if that equipment is available that is of comparable quality to that of ASML...
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
: ) Sounds like you agree with me that it's not easy for ASML to replace US origin parts.

If I remember correctly, all ASML scanner's reticle handling, reticle stage modules, optical sensors, wafer stage positioning module, and even some optics are fabricated in their U.S. Connecticut factory. You could check out their website, I'm sure there's some introduction of their manufacturing sites around the world and what they each build.
Are all those components magically made US components that none other American can make and can only be made in America? If they are not, and the Europeans actually possess the technological wherewithal to make them, even though it will take time to build the facilities to build them and then to also build them, then they CAN be built...

BUT they might not be built, unless the Dutch are so determined to maintain or even increase market share in China that they decide to do so and they indeed get assurances from China that China will purchase those products made there to an extent that recover the costs over the medium to long term...

I believe that ideally, China would to ensure that ASML maintains significant market share in lithographic equipment sales to Chinese companies, while also ensuring that Chinese equipment companies companies also gain such a share...
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
The big difference with Nikon is that SMEE will have a captive market with government fabs, and then when they are used as the test customers to perfect applications of (first immersion ArF, then EUV later), that experience can be transferred. Nikon on the other hand had a customer in Intel, but due to shrinking Japanese chip industry, had no real captive market.

I also did not say that EUV was easy, just that among the components, the big problems are the light source and wafer stage, while the mirrors are comparatively easier than the light source and wafer stage. But only comparatively. And I only mention it because the prior post asked about mirrors. If they asked about software, I wouldn't say anything, since I don't know software.
It boggles my mind why the Japanese have not made the effort to ensure that the domestic market for more advanced IC chip nodes is not dominated by Japanese fabs. I have read from many sources here and elsewhere that t most advanced logic chips manufactured in Japan are at just 40 nm.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
It boggles my mind why the Japanese have not made the effort to ensure that the domestic market for more advanced IC chip nodes is not dominated by Japanese fabs. I have read from many sources here and elsewhere that t most advanced logic chips manufactured in Japan are at just 40 nm.
Japan has no internal market for anything more advanced. They also don't have the fabless/foundry ecosystem that developed in the post-Cold War era, most of their fabs are IDMs.
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
Japan has no internal market for anything more advanced. They also don't have the fabless/foundry ecosystem that developed in the post-Cold War era, most of their fabs are IDMs.
Intel is an integrated device manufacturer too... So is Samsung... So being an integrated device manufacturer alone is not the problem... What else is it? Is it that fabless companies just tend to generally be better at designing logic chips than IDMs, especially for chips not used in PCs, because they can focus their resources in just that one area...
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
China cannot win by trying to localize everything, because after some time, even the lithium , iron, petroleum and even soyabean exports to China will be targeted.
If the United States tries to do that... It will be a hot war... Many countries might just respond to stop reading in goods that the United States seeks and need to import too...

But aside from that, China is pursuing a policy of maximizing self reliance. Whatever can be produced and obtained domestically, procure and produce it to the hilt...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top