Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
Nope,they can still buy US equipments,with restrictions,just like Huawei. Huawei is still complying with US rules,did you know that?Huawei refuse to provide Russia new telecom equipments,even as the Russians urge them to,as Nokia and Ericsson left Russia.
SMIC and Huawei, will never get a US license... that's why these two companies and CPC invest a lot in China's semiconductor supply chain since 2020....
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
If they want to keep expanding in 28nm probably they have no option than use local and non US equipment, they will have to de-Americanize their supply chain whatever they like it or not. There is not options.
You see there is not a lot of difference in the equipment used by a 28nm process node and a 14nm process node or a 7nm. A chips is made of a lot of layers, with different materials, semiconductors, dopants, oxides, metals, dielectrics. Deposited, patterned, etched, Implanted, diffused, polished, cleaned and so on.
...
Because BIS is too lazy to do research and find out was is unique for advanced nodes and what is not, they make no distinction between mature nodes and advance nodes Just "anything used for 16nm or less".
Yes. What the US government did was idiotic. The legislation was clearly done by people with only superficial knowledge of the field.

What will no doubt happen is the US companies will try, for now, to redesign any tools they want to export to China to have some kind of way to limit the physical characteristics of the tool. They might use lower machine tolerances when fabricating the physical components of the tools or put some kind of software limitation on the tools when possible. But this will be expensive to do and certify. Even if China is a third of your sales. Non-US companies will likely just design out US components altogether. And unless the US can convince the other Western aligned countries to join them in the ban it is quite likely the US tool companies will fade away.

compare to the hotly debated topic "domestic substitution" by the public. Chinese semiconductor firms aren't actually so enthusiastic about it. Some of them still have delusions about the US may lift the ban in the future,as stated in the artical below,and some are just satisfied with status quo. Which is the same thing.
Because as the US semiconductor tech advance further in future,they may update the threshold of the ban. And many Chinese firms may just satisfied with status quo of trailing behind the US,satisfied with taking what ever the US allowable,not interest with catching up.
There are domestic equipment manufactures using imported core components,to quickly push put new products,and claim credit for it. When the ban on these core components comes,these domestic equipment will be just as unreliable as foreign ones.
Also,there are fabs loves to talk about how supportive they are to domestic equipment/materials,but it's mere rhetoric,lack real action.
Well, these companies were just operating under the conditions of the regular market economy. There are currently a huge amount of semi fabs being built in China. But most of these companies lack the capital and talent to make significant investments in tool R&D in the first place. So what do you expect? You have a mix of tools the government funded for the strategic enterprises, and tools the private sector has been developing on a shoestring budget to meet current market demand. Once the Chinese semi market gets larger you will see more investments of the industry into the tools sector but right now this is difficult. Even though it does happen. For example SMIC has done small investments into the semi sector.

Nope,they can still buy US equipments,with restrictions,just like Huawei. Huawei is still complying with US rules,did you know that?Huawei refuse to provide Russia new telecom equipments,even as the Russians urge them to,as Nokia and Ericsson left Russia.
Yeah Huawei even closed their smartphone stores in Russia, unlike Xiaomi who kept them open. But AFAIK Huawei R&D facilities in Russia are still open.

SMIC and Huawei, will never get a US license... that's why these two companies and CPC invest a lot in China's semiconductor supply chain since 2020....
Huawei is in the US government blacklist so they have to ask for permission to use each US component. So far they basically have been given access to buy Micron memory chips and Qualcomm 4G SoCs and the like. But HiSilicon cannot fab anything outside China. If they can inside China.
 
Last edited:

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
This is the latest report released by Huahong,as you can see their most advanced node is 55nm.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
According to this old 2018 news,Huahong started to make 28nm back in 2018. So why there is no 28nm on their report?Do Huahong still making 28nm or the have they stalled the production?Huahong cannot ramp up 28nm production in four years time?



2022-11-12_094611.png
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is the latest report released by Huahong,as you can see their most advanced node is 55nm.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
According to this old 2018 news,Huahong started to make 28nm back in 2018. So why there is no 28nm on their report?Do Huahong still making 28nm or the have they stalled the production?Huahong cannot ramp up 28nm production in four years time?



View attachment 101671
Can you provide links.
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
Right now the best production facilities China can build with only its own made tools would use dry ArF i.e. 300mm wafers at 65nm. A lot of Chinese companies are working on the 28nm and 14nm and lower process tools which will require immersion lithography and improvements to the other machine tools. If you read the news folks have been posting here a lot of the other tools, other than lithography, are already 28nm capable, and some are even 14nm or even 7nm capable. There are all sorts of claims about the current capability of the Chinese immersion lithography tool prototype, or lack of capabilities, but the thing is AFAIK Chinese ArF tools of any kind are not used in mass production anywhere in China yet. Even the Chinese dry ArF lithography tools seem to be used by basically no one after being produced. SMEE has only sold some KrF lithography tools and not that many at that. The problem is SMEE's DUV excimer laser tools are not as efficient as the alternatives available outside of China so of course fabs won't buy them unless they have to. And to mass produce the immersion lithography tools will require new fabrication facilities which are planned to only begin production in 2025.

ASML still sells DUV to China. If lithography machine is the only bottleneck,and all other domestic equipments are up to task for 14nm,that means China already achieved non-American 14nm production line. But I'm skeptical about it,especially regarding testing equipments.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I swear, you really seem to have an innate ability to take any innocent looking news and put the most negative spin possible.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So it's clear now. The reason SMIC only build new 28nm fabs but not 14nm fabs,is that SMIC still needs(or wants)to comply with US regulations.

I remember earlier in this thread,I said that SMIC keep building new 28nm fabs but not 14nm fabs,is a sign that SMIC cannot get US equipment for 14nm process. A lot of people disagree,they say that SMIC don't build 14nm fabs is because there is no demand for 14nm in China,and SMIC isn't interest in building 14nm fab. They also claim that SMIC can totally build new 14nm fab without US equipments right now.

Well now SMIC made it loud and clear,the reason their newly expanded 28nm capacity isn't affected by the new US restriction,is NOT because they don't need US tech for 28nm fab anymore. Rather,it is because their technology is below the threshold set by the US.

See it?SMIC cannot even live without US tech for 28nm nodes,let alone 14nm
I have no idea how you got that from reading that link. Honestly, where do you see that they have stopped increasing their 14nm process. They are continuing to buy a bunch of NXT 2050i and 2100i. Do you think those are needed for 28nm production? Or do you think those are used for the most important process of producing N+1/N+2 chips like ASML has said? Do you think they need to raise their capex by 60% in second half to get ASML scanners faster if they were only content on producing 28nm and more mature node?

SMIC doesn't need to build more 14nm fabs. It is building out its SN2 fab right now (as we saw in a new article from January). And we know from Lam employee interview that SMSC fab does not use American tools (or use very little). The reason is because American gov't have not been allowing tools to be sold to this fab. A large part of the slowness in their SN1 production increase is due to the need to buy non-American tools.
New capacity not affected by new U.S. regulations

A questioner asked about overseas customers' demand for SMIC's production capacity. Zhao Haijun said that overseas companies tend to obtain long-term commitments from Chinese foundries to allocate capacity to ensure supply security. He explained that under the influence of the shortage of supply in various industries last year, today's overseas customers will maintain a certain proportion of products produced by Chinese companies. In order to ensure the security of the industrial chain, overseas customers and SMIC have formed a strategic alliance to obtain long-term commitments in production capacity allocation. He said that SMIC's cooperation with overseas customers is very fast.

In addition to industry cyclical factors, Zhao Haijun also mentioned that, according to preliminary interpretation, the production capacity and technology nodes of SMIC's customers fully comply with the new US regulations. He explained that the new regulations in the United States are mainly aimed at the production of American design companies in China, and the company's new production capacity and technology nodes are in full compliance with the relevant regulations. However, some customers need buffer time to interpret the new US export control regulations. The company maintains close communication with customers and suppliers, clarifies some concepts in the new regulations, and assesses the impact on the company. The work is still in progress.
You do realize that SMIC using any non-American tools is also in full compliance of relevant regulations right? As long as there are no Americans working at SMIC or servicing advanced SMIC process or selling 14nm and below techs, SMIC is in full compliance.

On top of that, these comments are being said in a way to assure that they do not lose their American clients. SMIC is being very careful about not letting the world know how much advanced node chips they are producing.

But we do know the following:
1) Report earlier this year that Shanghai company (SMIC) is fully capable of 14 nm process, which means they have achieved very high yield and able to handle complex 14nm production.
2) We do know they were already doing N+1 production (their 10nm process that got described as 7nm by techinsight) on small bitmining chip as early as July of 2021. By this point, we are all expecting that they have started mass producing much more advanced chips with N+1 process. Remember, they only got NXT-2050i scanners since H2 of last year and only NXT-2100i scanners since this past quarter. So the machines they have access to has also gotten more sophisticated since those initial bitmining chips.
3) We know they have changed the phrasing from 14nm as their most complex process to FinFet. An indication that they've moved beyond 14nm, but don't want to disclose where they are at.
4) We know that SMSC fab revenue has continued to increase based on their H1 report, which indicates their capacity has continued to increase this year to probably 30k wpm.
5) We also hear from Chinese social media that SMSC capacity is all booked up.
6) We know that Phytium's 14nm chips are produced at SMIC and their sales numbers are much higher this year than last year.

But at the end of the day, everyone on this forum is just as anxious as you are to see firm evidence that SMSC is in fact producing CPUs and GPUs for Chinese chip designers using its N+1 and N+2 process. That's why I'm personally eager to find out more about Moore Threads's new S80 GPU (which refuses to disclose fab or process). And I'm also eager to find out if the rumored 10nm process chip from this week (which will probably be SMIC N+1 process) will finally come out. I think we are just going to have to wait and see.

After all, we had to wait until this year to find out that 02 project succeeded last Q2. It's quite possible we will not find out SMSC's current progress until a year from now.
This is the latest report released by Huahong,as you can see their most advanced node is 55nm.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
According to this old 2018 news,Huahong started to make 28nm back in 2018. So why there is no 28nm on their report?Do Huahong still making 28nm or the have they stalled the production?Huahong cannot ramp up 28nm production in four years time?



View attachment 101671

Yes, Huahong Grace only produces 55nm and more mature chips in its Wuxi and 8-inch fabs. It has two separate fabs in the Huali JV that does more advanced proceses. HLMC apparently is capable of producing 14nm chips now. But we hear very little about it, because Huahong never reports on the progress of HLMC! This is obvious from their previous quarterly earning reports. From what we know, HLMC fab 6 (the one doing 28 to 14 nm process) is finally getting close to reaching its capacity of 40k wpm. There is also speculation now of a new HLMC advanced node fab. We will have to see. Overall, Huahong is growing a lot and their margins are getting much better. All great signs.

btw, do me a favor and not turn this thread into a bunch of bad takes + china grievance. It's really annoying and not helpful for people trying to learn more information.
 

PopularScience

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is the latest report released by Huahong,as you can see their most advanced node is 55nm.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
According to this old 2018 news,Huahong started to make 28nm back in 2018. So why there is no 28nm on their report?Do Huahong still making 28nm or the have they stalled the production?Huahong cannot ramp up 28nm production in four years time?



View attachment 101671
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

PopularScience

Junior Member
Registered Member
If regulations as tough as those for semiconductor equipment are applied to display equipment and materials makers, it is difficult for Chinese companies to receive core materials and equipment for displays. For example, in the glass substrate domain, U.S. company Corning holds a market share of more than 70 percent.

Is glass material a concern? any supplier in China?
no concern. I named one. 彩虹光电。

even Corning factories are in China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top