Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Prove it that there is no demand for 14nm in China

Why?

1. Fabs are expensive. 14nm fab should cost more than 28nm. Also, the 14nm chip mostly goes into computing equipment, which i) Chinese firms have been stockpiling, and ii) lots of capacity elsewhere in the world, meaning more competition.

2. It is a moot point too, about American sanctions and bans. The latest round of US sanctions, essentially means there will be no more servicing of equipment. If US personnel are forbidden to help Chinese companies, then those US machines will be not serviced by Americans.

Imagine yourself buying a car, with a law that says no servicing. The American IC company equipment maker was taken out of the entire Chinese market.

If SMIC says they are afraid of US sanctions, not sure which sanctions those would be, because everything has already been sanctioned, literally! LOL.
 

theorlonator

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And more bad news.

Firstly,compare to the hotly debated topic "domestic substitution" by the public. Chinese semiconductor firms aren't actually so enthusiastic about it. Some of them still have delusions about the US may lift the ban in the future,as stated in the artical below,and some are just satisfied with status quo. Which is the same thing.

Because as the US semiconductor tech advance further in future,they may update the threshold of the ban. And many Chinese firms may just satisfied with status quo of trailing behind the US,satisfied with taking what ever the US allowable,not interest with catching up.



There are domestic equipment manufactures using imported core components,to quickly push put new products,and claim credit for it. When the ban on these core components comes,these domestic equipment will be just as unreliable as foreign ones.

Also,there are fabs loves to talk about how supportive they are to domestic equipment/materials,but it's mere rhetoric,lack real action.
This whole forum is contained with posts showing that all the domestic equipment companies are increasing their revenue. Just because a person said "domestic companies aren't happy about it and think the US will change" doesn't mean that they're not acting upon domestication.
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
let China do what the US hates the most, which is the localized 7nm semiconductor manufacturing process in 2024, China likes to distract.... they can report what they want, but their approach will be different from what they report to the media
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
Yes, they clearly needed to do two step back to do a jump, A LONG TIME AGO at the time ZTE was added to the blacklist and not become dependent of unreliable companies.

Components is not a big deal as long is not American or made in the US. Locally made components should have the biggest market share, followed by non US components and with the current situation US components should be treated as mercury salts.

The new US ban seems to caught many Chinese companies by surprise,and they have to rush to get as many US equipments as possible before deadline. It just shows how naive these Chinese companies are,do they still not get it that the US and China are in a tech war,that supply from the US is so unreliable which could be cutoff anytime?

They don't seem to have learned anything from all the blacklisted companies,it only when themself get bite do them feel the pain.
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
Why?

1. Fabs are expensive. 14nm fab should cost more than 28nm. Also, the 14nm chip mostly goes into computing equipment, which i) Chinese firms have been stockpiling, and ii) lots of capacity elsewhere in the world, meaning more competition.

2. It is a moot point too, about American sanctions and bans. The latest round of US sanctions, essentially means there will be no more servicing of equipment. If US personnel are forbidden to help Chinese companies, then those US machines will be not serviced by Americans.

Imagine yourself buying a car, with a law that says no servicing. The American IC company equipment maker was taken out of the entire Chinese market.

If SMIC says they are afraid of US sanctions, not sure which sanctions those would be, because everything has already been sanctioned, literally! LOL.
because most of the R&D of mainland chip companies is still 40nm or less, very few companies have the ability to accelerate R&D
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
This whole forum is contained with posts showing that all the domestic equipment companies are increasing their revenue. Just because a person said "domestic companies aren't happy about it and think the US will change" doesn't mean that they're not acting upon domestication.

Well,there are lots of fabs in China,not all of them have the same degree of support. There are many fabs have no bidding info available to public,so they may not buying domestic equipments. China is one of the biggest market for semiconductor equipments,had all Chinese fabs have the same degree support for domestic equipments,these Chinese equipment manufactures would have a similar revenue to the likes of LAM/KLA/AMAT.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
because most of the R&D of mainland chip companies is still 40nm or less, very few companies have the ability to accelerate R&D
I'm surprised I have to correct you on this. China has fully indigenized 28nm production and the lithography tools will be mass produced next year. ICRD is currently testing an indigenous 14nm line and so far so good. What's unclear is if the SSA800 (the machine that was verified this year and starting mass production next year) can go down to 7nm or if further refinements/a new machine will be required.

That's the picture for indigenous tools. China has a stock of foreign tools it can still use (even without service agreements) and indigenous tools will be ready (even indigenous EUVL) long before these tools are exhausted. So the path down to 7nm is clear.
 

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
If regulations as tough as those for semiconductor equipment are applied to display equipment and materials makers, it is difficult for Chinese companies to receive core materials and equipment for displays. For example, in the glass substrate domain, U.S. company Corning holds a market share of more than 70 percent.

Is glass material a concern? any supplier in China?

What type of glass does BYD uses for its touch screens inside their cars?
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
I'm surprised I have to correct you on this. China has fully indigenized 28nm production and the lithography tools will be mass produced next year. ICRD is currently testing an indigenous 14nm line and so far so good. What's unclear is if the SSA800 (the machine that was verified this year and starting mass production next year) can go down to 7nm or if further refinements/a new machine will be required.

That's the picture for indigenous tools. China has a stock of foreign tools it can still use (even without service agreements) and indigenous tools will be ready (even indigenous EUVL) long before these tools are exhausted. So the path down to 7nm is clear.
if it comes out in time with the 193nm ARF-I it can produce 5nm... but their photoresist system is still not up to the 5nm level... 7nm can do it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top