In 2021 <> the number of R&D personnel will increase by 19.9% to 415.
I'm surprised that you seemed surprised about the info on size of AMEC R&D team.This is a interesting piece of information. Does someone know about how many R&D people work at AMEC's competitor firms?
@hvpc bro I discovered a YT video depicting the progress and History of China IC. I believed in China strategy of deployment (28nm and 14nm line) , present research (7nm line) and future research (5nm line ). The first one is heavy debated and we know that the SSA800 28nm DUVL is being deployed, with this machine and future improve iteration aside from producing 7nm with multi patterning, it can also do 5nm as the video disclose that Henan Research Institute has developed a fully automatic 12 inch wafer laser graving equipment which support 5nm DBG process. The domestic 7nm line will be finished by most optimistic timeline of mid 2023, as @WTAN once said IF your mastered 14nm finfet tech going down to 7nm is much easier cause you used the same equipment with a few tweaks. Now one by one as the video indicates they're trying their hands on 5nm line, with each breakthrough, I may surmised that a 5nm line will be available by late 2024 together with an Improved SSA900 22nm DUVL. I have confidences that China will reach its goal of Tech independence (of 7nm, 5nm and even an EUVL) within the next 3 years as multiple company however small will explore, research and innovate as survival and opportunity beckons.I'm surprised that you seemed surprised about the info on size of AMEC R&D team.
AMEC is very small compared to the big western WFE conglomerates. This shouldn't be a surprise. Still long way for domestic WFE companies to go to reach parity with the west.......or reach 70% make share.
Couldn't find the exact number of R&D people at AMAT/LAM, but maybe you can extrapolate from below stats (2021):
AMAT Revenue=$23B / R&D expense is $2.5B / 27,000 total employees
LAM Revenue=$16.5B / R&D expenses is $1.49B / 14,100 total employees
AMEC Revenue=$0.48B / R&D expenses is ~<$0.15 / <1,000 employees
To the opposite. OPPO and VIVO were founded by the same people, who are anything but pro-PLA.Soon, out of the blue, somebody would say that OPPO is related to PLA
@ansy1968,@hvpc bro I discovered a YT video depicting the progress and History of China IC. I believed in China strategy of deployment (28nm and 14nm line) , present research (7nm line) and future research (5nm line ). The first one is heavy debated and we know that the SSA800 28nm DUVL is being deployed, with this machine and future improve iteration aside from producing 7nm with multi patterning, it can also do 5nm as the video disclose that Henan Research Institute has developed a fully automatic 12 inch wafer laser graving equipment which support 5nm DBG process. The domestic 7nm line will be finished by most optimistic timeline of mid 2023, as @WTAN once said IF your mastered 14nm finfet tech going down to 7nm is much easier cause you used the same equipment with a few tweaks. Now one by one as the video indicates they're trying their hands on 5nm line, with each breakthrough, I may surmised that a 5nm line will be available by late 2024 together with an Improved SSA900 22nm DUVL. I have confidences that China will reach its goal of Tech independence (of 7nm, 5nm and even an EUVL) within the next 3 years as multiple company however small will explore, research and innovate as survival and opportunity beckons.
208 views1 hour ag
Actually, the reason for Intel's failure with 10 nm is their insistence on cobalt interconnects and contact over active gate (COAG). These are still not attempted by the TSMC. Intel tried to leapfrog everyone and paid for that.Intel has spent a long time trying to shrink their transistors more with immersion DUV litho and so far it has been a failure.
One reason why TSMC is ahead of Intel right now is they went big on EUV before them while Intel gave up EUV despite being an early proponent like a decade ago. Now Intel plans to jump straight into high NA EUV from what I understand.