Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

hvpc

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is a very real risk. There is talk of using existing sanctions to ban DUV machines from SMIC in the US. You also have to remember that even if SMIC is buys a DUV from ASML it is likely to be reported to a government agency in the US.

The real big change is that news from SMIC has shifted from 14nm, N+1 and N+2 to 28nm. If SMIC was truly confident in the supply of DUV machines from ASML, then it would also be engaged in major expansion of its manufacturing capacity at the 14nm node.


My point was it is relatively simple for the average person to own shares of major semiconductor manufacturers. In fact just buying common market index ETFs would likely mean you are indirectly invested in a semiconductor manufacturing company.


Many here are skeptical. That is why the next milestone is still mass production at 14nm despite many of the people here talking about EUV machines (it's just more interesting to talk about EUVL development). The point being made is that all evidence points to 28nm as essentially a done deal at this point. The question is not if SMEE has a DUV machine, but how capable the DUV machine from SMEE is right now. There is still a large gap between manufacturing 28nm and 7nm using a DUV machine.
You seemed to have done your research and are have solid conviction. Nice!

sorry, another question…Do you expect SMEE to be able to deliver a production worthy tool on their first try? why or why not?
Also could you share your opinion on what performance metric would be SMEE’s biggest challenge to build a production immersion system? Just curious what your opinion on this is.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
We don't know, SMEE is not transparent enough. The only way to get an idea of the potential performance will be to get an idea of the different subsystem manufacturers, U-precision and others had published some of their performance but it was from 2014, another problem is looking at the different patents. that much has been recently developed or is in the process of being developed, so it will be hard to get a performance just by looking at the patents.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I think hvpc has actually gotten a warmer reception here than I would've expected. I mean tinrobert comes here and post stuff in general without being condescending and share his knowledge and people give him a hard time. It wouldn't surprise me if hvpc works in semiconductor industry, but I wonder why a 50+ year old person with 30 years of experience would come on a military forum to spout off his knowledge. Seems like his projection is just what your typical industry person outside of China would think. Not that far apart from articles I read online of China's progress. Guess what, I also have a friend in semiconductor industry with contacts in China that thinks China will be able to catch up in many areas in a few years.

Nobody really knows. More importantly, it's important for Chinese domestic industry to underplay some of its capabilities to not attract more sanctions. And it's also important for them to try to unproven domestic technology, since the threat of a DUVL ban is very real. You obviously keep importing from ASML while you can, but you also have to spend resource working with a non proven SMEE solution.
 

def333

New Member
Registered Member
my friends in SMIC and YMTC are not aware of them taking shipment of SMEE immersion system. are you certain these immersion machine has already shipped from SMEE?
You from Taiwan, Your friend works at SMIC and YMTC?
 

wxw456

New Member
Registered Member
You seemed to have done your research and are have solid conviction. Nice!

sorry, another question…Do you expect SMEE to be able to deliver a production worthy tool on their first try? why or why not?
Also could you share your opinion on what performance metric would be SMEE’s biggest challenge to build a production immersion system? Just curious what your opinion on this is.
First try? Development is more like a back and forth feedback process between equipment manufacturer and user, than a take it or leave it off the shelf product. Us outsiders likely won't get public confirmation of anything until the machine is absolutely ready or already in usage.

Biggest challenge? You need to ask a company insider to truly know that.

I will state that SMIC and SMEE will almost certainly remain solely engaged in manufacturing commercial ICs. Military ICs are explicitly handled by CETC. If you think SMEE is quiet/secretive, then good luck even trying to see what progress CETC is making on their lithography machines!
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think hvpc has actually gotten a warmer reception here than I would've expected. I mean tinrobert comes here and post stuff in general without being condescending and share his knowledge and people give him a hard time. It wouldn't surprise me if hvpc works in semiconductor industry, but I wonder why a 50+ year old person with 30 years of experience would come on a military forum to spout off his knowledge. Seems like his projection is just what your typical industry person outside of China would think. Not that far apart from articles I read online of China's progress. Guess what, I also have a friend in semiconductor industry with contacts in China that thinks China will be able to catch up in many areas in a few years.

Nobody really knows. More importantly, it's important for Chinese domestic industry to underplay some of its capabilities to not attract more sanctions. And it's also important for them to try to unproven domestic technology, since the threat of a DUVL ban is very real. You obviously keep importing from ASML while you can, but you also have to spend resource working with a non proven SMEE solution.
I seems the this person has knowledge on the industry and that is good for this forum. But I personally find Boosting about impressive experience and boosting about connections in the industry in a anonymous forum, were nothing can be proven, to be not good enough. Because by the way the semiconductor industry is one of the most documented industry in the planet, there is lot of trade secrets, but you can learn a lot just studying own your own.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jiang ZeminFanboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
The meeting ended without an immediate resolution, and that left hawks in Washington dissatisfied. “No update to the SMIC licensing policy is a major mistake,’’ Michael McCaul, the lead Republican of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement. “We cannot let the interests of one industry segment result in the Chinese military being able to make its own semiconductors.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 85392

View attachment 85393

View attachment 85394

The risk is very real.
But since when SMIC is producing chips for Chinese military? Since the beginning it was CETC, and on the lower resolution than 16 nm. Military doesn't need the latest one. Republicans brain dead.
 

hvpc

Junior Member
Registered Member
First try? Development is more like a back and forth feedback process between equipment manufacturer and user, than a take it or leave it off the shelf product. Us outsiders likely won't get public confirmation of anything until the machine is absolutely ready or already in usage.

Biggest challenge? You need to ask a company insider to truly know that.

I will state that SMIC and SMEE will almost certainly remain solely engaged in manufacturing commercial ICs. Military ICs are explicitly handled by CETC. If you think SMEE is quiet/secretive, then good luck even trying to see what progress CETC is making on their lithography machines!
So that means you would accept what I said earlier about SMEE could ship a system late this year or early 2023…but will take a year or two to tune all the systems (iLine/krf/ArF/immersion/other process tools/etc.) for 28nm production?
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
But since when SMIC is producing chips for Chinese military? Since the beginning it was CETC, and on the lower resolution than 16 nm. Military doesn't need the latest one. Republicans brain dead.
Republicans / Dems don’t care if SMIC does or doesn’t produce chips for the military. They don’t want China tech industry to be competitive therefore they must try to destroy China tech foundation. I believe cotton boy was the one to tweet on sanctioning and banning YMTC immediately after news of their 128 layer (can’t remember) came out.
 

wxw456

New Member
Registered Member
So that means you would accept what I said earlier about SMEE could ship a system late this year or early 2023…but will take a year or two to tune all the systems (iLine/krf/ArF/immersion/other process tools/etc.) for 28nm production?
It is suspected that SMEE has already sent machines to manufacturers for testing and feedback. The move to use more domestic equipment is larger than just SMEE. IC manufacturers are testing and integrating various equipment from multiple equipment manufacturers (AMEC, NAURA, SMEE, etc).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top