Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

hvpc

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I had assumed all 160K 300mm Wafwrs per month @ Beijing fab are capable of 28nm (previously website did not split that up the capacity numbers to 24-65nm & 55nm-0.18um). So using this new info but assume all 100k of 24-65nm can handle 28nm…plus 34K of 14nm from Shanghai, we are looking at only 135K 300mm wpm or 303K 200mm wpm….which would translate to roughly the 3.5M number you quoted, but in wafers per year.

then let’s multiply by 5…then we are looking at additional 675K 300mm wpm to be added.
SMIC already announced 235K 300mm wpm before 2025. So, I e can assume 440K more 300mm wpm could be added after 2025 (or 990K 200mm wpm).

that’s just a rough guesstimate based on known current capacity, capacity expansion, and on what Dr Zhao Haijun said. of course, to be accurate we have to look at the end application trend that would use 28nm from 2024 to 2035. But that would require more research.

anyhow, above is just my two cents.
some links on info I shared above for your reference:

New announced 28nm Shanghai fab:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


New Beijing fab:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This one talked about the second 14nm and below fab in Shanghai:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

european_guy

Junior Member
Registered Member
I’m not sure about Gigaphonton’s involvement in the development of domestic system. My understanding is SMEE will integrate this immersion system with laser from RS Laser of Beijing. I was under the impression RS Laser’s 193nm light source is ready. I didn’t hear of any delay because of the laser.
On your second question, I was doing research on industry status because I own SMIC stock. I want to know what’s going on in China since it would have impact on SMIC…and I stumbled on this forum. I asked a few questions and then the dialogue sort of just took off. I’m hoping to supplement my understanding with any info I can pickup from here…and hope to have good dialogue. It’s never a bad thing to have more info…even if just rumors, it’s worth looking into.
If you feel like I’m “showing off”, I apologize. I’m just trying to share some info to balance out some views that I thought may be a bit unrealistic. trying to be useful and to engage…that’s all.

Thanks for replying to me.

Please, accept some doubt from the forum, I guess it is totally normal, considering how you choose to “entering the scene" :)

FWIW I don't ask myself too much about who are you or where are you from. I just post and will post questions / notes that are interesting to me and possibly to other people in this forum.
 

wxw456

New Member
Registered Member
Assuming domestic 28nm equipment is available from 2025, how much wafer capacity could China build out from 2025-2035?

If we're going by 200MM wafer equivalents @ 28nm, China is currently at 3.5 Million WPM in terms of installed capacity.

My read is that this could be expanded to a minimum of 10 Million WPM by 2035 and that all this capacity could be consumed solely within China or placed in Chinese exports.
Deja vu? I swear the exact same 28nm debate happened a year ago in this thread.

At that time I pointed out that SMIC was building a new 28nm fab in Shenzhen that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 40,000 wafers per month. Production is expected to start sometime in 2022 for the new Shenzhen fab. Since then SMIC has started construction on a new 28nm fab in Shanghai that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 100,000 wafers per month. Given that SMIC is under sanctions, it is reasonable to assume that they have alternatives to any equipment that could be denied. I seriously doubt the company would risk $10 billion+ of investments on the known risk of being denied equipment. This indirectly points to SMIC having access to a 28nm capable frontend lithography machine that cannot be sanctioned. I will also point out that TSMC and UMC have significant 28nm capacity in China.

I also pointed out that SMIC has only slowly expanded its 14nm capable fab to about 15,000 wafers per month in 2021. This indicates that the company is not yet confident in procuring enough equipment to build a new 14nm fab. My stance is still the same since last year, SMIC initiating a large expansion at the 14nm node would indirectly indicate the existence of a domestic DUV capable of 14nm.

Everyone also needs to remember that this is an anonymous forum. Saying you have credentials or experience is pointless because none of it is verifiable by other users. Owning stock is also useless because anyone with a brokerage account could buy shares of Intel, AMD, ASML, TSMC, etc. Owning stock does not make you an expert.
 

hvpc

Junior Member
Registered Member
Deja vu? I swear the exact same 28nm debate happened a year ago in this thread.

At that time I pointed out that SMIC was building a new 28nm fab in Shenzhen that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 40,000 wafers per month. Production is expected to start sometime in 2022 for the new Shenzhen fab. Since then SMIC has started construction on a new 28nm fab in Shanghai that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 100,000 wafers per month. Given that SMIC is under sanctions, it is reasonable to assume that they have alternatives to any equipment that could be denied. I seriously doubt the company would risk $10 billion+ of investments on the known risk of being denied equipment. This indirectly points to SMIC having access to a 28nm capable frontend lithography machine that cannot be sanctioned. I will also point out that TSMC and UMC have significant 28nm capacity in China.

I also pointed out that SMIC has only slowly expanded its 14nm capable fab to about 15,000 wafers per month in 2021. This indicates that the company is not yet confident in procuring enough equipment to build a new 14nm fab. My stance is still the same since last year, SMIC initiating a large expansion at the 14nm node would indirectly indicate the existence of a domestic DUV capable of 14nm.

Everyone also needs to remember that this is an anonymous forum. Saying you have credentials or experience is pointless because none of it is verifiable by other users. Owning stock is also useless because anyone with a brokerage account could buy shares of Intel, AMD, ASML, TSMC, etc. Owning stock does not make you an expert.
SMIC is not sanctioned from buying DUV immersion systems for 28nm or 14nm.

could you kindly explain why you believe otherwise?
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Deja vu? I swear the exact same 28nm debate happened a year ago in this thread.

At that time I pointed out that SMIC was building a new 28nm fab in Shenzhen that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 40,000 wafers per month. Production is expected to start sometime in 2022 for the new Shenzhen fab. Since then SMIC has started construction on a new 28nm fab in Shanghai that processes 300mm wafers at a rate of 100,000 wafers per month. Given that SMIC is under sanctions, it is reasonable to assume that they have alternatives to any equipment that could be denied. I seriously doubt the company would risk $10 billion+ of investments on the known risk of being denied equipment. This indirectly points to SMIC having access to a 28nm capable frontend lithography machine that cannot be sanctioned. I will also point out that TSMC and UMC have significant 28nm capacity in China.

I also pointed out that SMIC has only slowly expanded its 14nm capable fab to about 15,000 wafers per month in 2021. This indicates that the company is not yet confident in procuring enough equipment to build a new 14nm fab. My stance is still the same since last year, SMIC initiating a large expansion at the 14nm node would indirectly indicate the existence of a domestic DUV capable of 14nm.

Everyone also needs to remember that this is an anonymous forum. Saying you have credentials or experience is pointless because none of it is verifiable by other users. Owning stock is also useless because anyone with a brokerage account could buy shares of Intel, AMD, ASML, TSMC, etc. Owning stock does not make you an expert.

@hvpc disclosed his holdings in SMIC as a disclaimer.
 

Schmoe

New Member
Registered Member
As a first-time poster but long-time lurker, I welcome new contributions from others who have a different - and perhaps more experienced - perspective. Given China's history of grossly under-performing past semiconductor goals, caution and healthy skepticism regarding bullish statements on technical progress is warranted.
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
As a first-time poster but long-time lurker, I welcome new contributions from others who have a different - and perhaps more experienced - perspective. Given China's history of grossly under-performing past semiconductor goals, caution and healthy skepticism regarding bullish statements on technical progress is warranted.
The difference is, this time we have Comrade Trump on our side.

Comrade Trump accomplished something Xi nor any previous Chinese leader was able to do - galvanize the private sector :)
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
As a first-time poster but long-time lurker, I welcome new contributions from others who have a different - and perhaps more experienced - perspective. Given China's history of grossly under-performing past semiconductor goals, caution and healthy skepticism regarding bullish statements on technical progress is warranted.
I do agree and we should be skeptical, that is why 2020 when all the debate of whatever SMEE was developing in DUVi machine started I was pretty skeptical too but doing my "research" I have become less so, I am pretty convinced now. The new saga now is when is going to be delivered, the real answer is: We don't know, SMEE is not transparent enough to us put a concrete date.
The ultimate saga will be if the machine will be up to standards, the real answer is: We don't know, SMEE is not transparent enough.


Also I am sorry if I offended anyone but I am just skeptical of social media-like post like "I have a friend in the industry" or posting impressive credentials without backing it up. That is why I avoid posting from twitter.
 

wxw456

New Member
Registered Member
SMIC is not sanctioned from buying DUV immersion systems for 28nm or 14nm.

could you kindly explain why you believe otherwise?
It is a very real risk. There is talk of using existing sanctions to ban DUV machines from SMIC in the US. You also have to remember that even if SMIC is buys a DUV from ASML it is likely to be reported to a government agency in the US.

The real big change is that news from SMIC has shifted from 14nm, N+1 and N+2 to 28nm. If SMIC was truly confident in the supply of DUV machines from ASML, then it would also be engaged in major expansion of its manufacturing capacity at the 14nm node.

@hvpc disclosed his holdings in SMIC as a disclaimer.
My point was it is relatively simple for the average person to own shares of major semiconductor manufacturers. In fact just buying common market index ETFs would likely mean you are indirectly invested in a semiconductor manufacturing company.

As a first-time poster but long-time lurker, I welcome new contributions from others who have a different - and perhaps more experienced - perspective. Given China's history of grossly under-performing past semiconductor goals, caution and healthy skepticism regarding bullish statements on technical progress is warranted.
Many here are skeptical. That is why the next milestone is still mass production at 14nm despite many of the people here talking about EUV machines (it's just more interesting to talk about EUVL development). The point being made is that all evidence points to 28nm as essentially a done deal at this point. The question is not if SMEE has a DUV machine, but how capable the DUV machine from SMEE is right now. There is still a large gap between manufacturing 28nm and 7nm using a DUV machine.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
It is a very real risk. There is talk of using existing sanctions to ban DUV machines from SMIC in the US. You also have to remember that even if SMIC is buys a DUV from ASML it is likely to be reported to a government agency in the US.
The meeting ended without an immediate resolution, and that left hawks in Washington dissatisfied. “No update to the SMIC licensing policy is a major mistake,’’ Michael McCaul, the lead Republican of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement. “We cannot let the interests of one industry segment result in the Chinese military being able to make its own semiconductors.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1647526452602.png

1647526569100.png

1647526700480.png

The risk is very real.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top