Like discussed in the article sanctions on immersion lithography sales to SMIC and other major Chinese semiconductor industry players could have a major impact on ASML's sales. If, for whatever reason, they sanction sales of immersion lithography to China this will provide SMEE a major impetus to not only produce their own machines but also to massively ramp up their production.
@tinrobert mentioned how SMEE had ordered EUV machines from ASML and they were never delivered. CXMT, which is the leading Chinese DRAM manufacturer, also had EUV on its product development roadmap at one point. CXMT's CEO at one point visited ASML to discuss the purchase of equipment. I would not be surprised if sales of EUV equipment were discussed at one point. CXMT, as well as the other Chinese DRAM vendors, have all had friction with Micron. CXMT might end up in a US sanctions list as well. In the case of YTMC I think any sanctions they apply to them will have much less impact since YMTC manufacture V-NAND which uses lower resolution processes with multiple layers.
I doubt the sanctions on SMEE will have any major impact. SMEE is an integrator much like ASML. They assemble products and add the secret sauce to get it all to work together. Their supply chain AFAIK uses no US origin hardware components. In fact all their major components should have Chinese origin.
The numbers SMIC has released on wafer revenue by technology are more obfuscated than they used to be on the past. FinFET/28nm include the 14nm and lower resolution processes i.e. 10nm. IIRC FinFET used to be specifically enumerated in SMIC's reports reports but not any more.
I also agree with one of the commenters that a supply glut over the next two years is definitively possible. Not only from all the new Chinese and other fab construction but also that if, for whatever reason, COVID-19 subsides and people get back to work and children back to school worldwide then hardware sales will drop off a cliff.
I have some doubts about the future success of the Nikon machine. Few companies bothered with the transition towards FinFET. Those which did all have EUV roadmaps. Even Intel now claims they will use EUV. How easy would it be to integrate Nikon and ASML lithography machines in the same production pipeline? The market leaders are transitioning towards 3nm production in the future and that will only happen with EUV. Nikon might at best get some of the companies which did not bother transitioning to EUV yet. In a market like China, Nikon could also find some success given they can't even buy EUV machines. So vendor lock-in by ASML would be much weaker in China than other markets. However if the US does indeed sanction immersion DUV sales this would basically kill any future prospects for Nikon in my opinion.
In the medium term I do not think China will have an impact on EUV sales for ASML. Since China cannot get EUV machines for their own foundries they will just have to purchase services or chips abroad. So the machines will still get sold just not to China. What would cause a major impact on EUV machine sales would be a blanket ban on sales of EUV produced chips to China. This cannot possibly happen, I think, given all the manufacture industry that is in China for all sorts of electronics components. This isn't like putting sanctions on Iraq in the 1990s where back then they couldn't even import a Sony PlayStation 2 console because that had too much compute performance and was classed as a "supercomputer". The US has struggled with this dilemma all along. They use blacklists to sanction some Chinese entities but they can never do a blanket ban because it would impact the world supply market and especially their own companies. Among others you would decimate world smartphone, tablet, personal computer, and server production. This means the sanctions will be weak.