Geographer
Junior Member
So vesicles and plawolf, if not for defense cooperation or to bolster China's air defenses, how do you explain the arms purchase?
I know it's fashionable to dismiss strategic bombers as Cold War relics, but they have proved their utility to the USAF in many wars. The B-52 and B-1B are huge bomb trucks which can saturate an area with bombs. They can launch dozens of cruise missiles at high altitude and high speed, more than doubling their range. The fact that China is still upgrading its H-6s show China also sees value in the heavy bombers. Imagine what adding something like the Tu-22M Backfire would do to the PLAAF's strike capability.
I agree with this. The Su-35s should be low priority for China because they already have so many capable fighters, from the J-10A to the the J-11B. China needs AEW, long range bombers, and heavy transports a lot more than fighters.High-performance, high-endurance SSNs, SSGNs, and SSBNs for long patrols in the Central Pacific and Arabian Sea, since those areas straddle sealanes vital to Chinese commerce
Long-range bombers in the Tu-160 or B1-B weight class
ASW helicopters and sonar systems (especially passive arrays that can detect the newest European and Japanese SSKs)
SLBMs (I doubt Russia would ever offer substantial expertise on this, but if such a deal was accomplished, it would send an unmistakeable signal that China and Russia have set in stone a de facto alliance.)
I know it's fashionable to dismiss strategic bombers as Cold War relics, but they have proved their utility to the USAF in many wars. The B-52 and B-1B are huge bomb trucks which can saturate an area with bombs. They can launch dozens of cruise missiles at high altitude and high speed, more than doubling their range. The fact that China is still upgrading its H-6s show China also sees value in the heavy bombers. Imagine what adding something like the Tu-22M Backfire would do to the PLAAF's strike capability.