Why do u think they havent yet? is Leap engine from a French US company?There is simply no chance China would sleep walk pass this:
View attachment 143195
That was five years ago. The urgency for CJ1000A and CJ2000 comes directly from that.
There is simply no chance China would sleep walk pass this:
View attachment 143195
That was five years ago. The urgency for CJ1000A and CJ2000 comes directly from that.
CFM is a 50/50 joint venture between General Electric and Safran.Why do u think they havent yet? is Leap engine from a French US company?
in Early 2020, US administration decided to block LEAP engine sales to COMACWhy do u think they havent yet? is Leap engine from a French US company?
C919 used LEAP-1C variant. specifically developed for C919 and CFM purposely didn't include latest technology in this variant like CMC material and engine also lacks many of the improvements of the other LEAP models over concerns that the technology could stolen. and might be use in CJ-1000..
i was about to say this..That sounds more like a ploy to keep C919 less competitive with western planes rather than to prevent technology theft. They export A320neo and 737max, as many as China would buy, which comes fitted with LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B.
Not to speak ill of the CJ-1000A turbofan or the development path it has taken thus far, but foreign customers may insist on the employment of Western engines due to political pressure and/or regulatory gridlock for decades to come.
China needs around 8000 narrowbodies in the next two decades.
Boeing built 528 commercial jets in 2023. If COMAC takes the entire Chinese market, it needs to build 400 C919s a year. Not that far off from Boeing on one jet liner alone.
Foreign orders are basically surplus and, frankly, irrelevant though good to have. Just grabbing a chunk of the domestic market will automatically make COMAC massively successful.
C919 used LEAP-1C variant. specifically developed for C919 and CFM purposely didn't include latest technology in this variant like CMC material and engine also lacks many of the improvements of the other LEAP models