Well, the AL-31/F110/WS-10 familes all got tons of variants. By "late" you can mean anything from the AL-31FM2 (which I refer to as the AL-31F-99M1) to the AL-41F. Same for the WS-10 (WS-10D vs WS-10C).
But in terms of common variants that can be seen on actual AF jets (so disregarding early early WS-10s when their reliability is in the mud or variants like the AL-31F3/FU(naval)/etc.), my personal ranking (averaging thrust, reliability, lifespan, technology) would be:
AL-31F < AL-31FP/FN ≤ WS-10A < F110-GE-100 < AL-31FM1 < AL-31FN-3 < WS-10B (pre 2018) ≤ F110-GE-129 < WS-10B (post 2018) < AL-31FM2 < AL-41F-1S ≤ WS-10D ≈ F110-GE-132
These are all 4th gen engines with more or less the same approximate performance and goals, ranked by collectively considering their (as stated above) thrust at SL, reliability (as heard from pilots and data if available), lifespan, and technology.
If we were to consider performance envelopes, it'd be much trickier. But one thing though, it might give the WS-10s a better ranking since their thrust curves are ridiculous at high speed compared to their peers (even the WS-10A has noticeably better supersonic thrust curves than the F110-GE-129).
Then a generational gap that seperates the above from the following:
AL-41F ≤ WS-10C (pre 2022) < WS-10C (post 2022) < F119 < WS-15
Obviously, these rankings are based on an oversimplified criteria, but it shows how the Chinese climbed their way through this ladder (and that the F110s is indeed superior to the AL-31Fs).
The F135 is a weird one. Although it's technologically very much a 5th generation engine, it's performance was optimised to the opposite direction as the other 5th gen engines (F119, WS-15). I'd even put it in a different class. But if I had to cram it somewhere, it'd be approximately equal to the WS-15.
That's true, and the F135's thrust is actually 35 kN more powerful, so it's not exactly "slight."
But it doesn't have the high speed performance of the F119. That's what a higher BPR does to you (unless you're the Chinese, which they somehow can drag incredible supersonic performance out of a > 0.5 BPR).
As I've said, I wouldn't confidently put it above or below the F119/WS-15 cause the F135 is clearly made for a different purpose. Sure, its subsonic SL thrust is impressive, but once you've reached transonic, it's the F119/WS-15's domain.
Using the same requirements as above:
F404 < RD-93 < WS-13 < RD-93MA < WS-21 < F414 ≤ EJ200 < WS-19
One caveat though is that the F404's compressor aerodynamics is horrid, and the F414 isn't significantly better. Their supersonic performance is quite lacking.
Yeah, that's why I had to use a crude criterion. Don't take those too seriously.
