Re: Updates on Chinese engines...
I think this information is pretty legit. The overall article discusses topics that are going to be brought up at the annual CPCC and NPC meetings. The information provided doesn't really overreach and seems to conform with what we currently know about most of these projects. The article doesn't really give us anything more than specific dates, which is usually more typical of official information and not speculative or faked articles.
Yours is accurate enough. The information listed is pretty straight forward. My guess is that the WS-10 variant might be a WS-10B, or the long rumoured WS-10G. 空天发动机 probably refers to the engines for a spaceplane. The 15 T:W's core itself will be completed in 2016, not its testing.
An interesting article from the official Xinhua news agency, and it summarizes various Chinese engine projects.
The pertinent passage is this:
宣布发动机“两个专项”
目前,航空发动机和燃气轮机“两机”科技重大专项已经顺利成为国家第20个重大技术专项,与空天飞机和高超音速飞行器专项一起成为国家航空航天领域的重要突破。“两机专项”包括国家重点军用两用发动机项目研制、对现有发动机进行改进以及探索和预研新一代发动机项目。预计涡扇-15发动机将于2014完成验证机;涡扇-10改发动机将于2015首飞;长江-1000A发动机将于2016年首飞;空天发动机将于2016年挂飞;推比15一级的第五代发动机将于2016年完成核心机... 航空发动机含铼高温合金单晶叶片...
My Chinese is horrible, but here's a summary (likely with many errors):
1) WS-15 prototype/demonstrator is to be completed in 2014.
2) A modified WS-10 is to have first flight in 2015. I'm not sure if this WS-10A or B or some other variant.
3) CJ-1000A (Yangtze-1000A) high-bypass turbofan to have first flight in 2016.
4) '空天发动机'? Whatever this is, will conduct flight tests in 2016.
5) '推比15', which is a 'fifth-generation' engine, is to complete core tests in 2016.
6) Pursue the development of 'Rhenium single-crystal super-alloy blades'.
I'd really appreciate it if someone could provide an accurate translation.
P.S. the rest of the article could be interesting as well.
I think this information is pretty legit. The overall article discusses topics that are going to be brought up at the annual CPCC and NPC meetings. The information provided doesn't really overreach and seems to conform with what we currently know about most of these projects. The article doesn't really give us anything more than specific dates, which is usually more typical of official information and not speculative or faked articles.
Last edited: