China's SCS Strategy Thread

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
FR were not with US in Irak. They may ending (or not) fight along side the US in a TW scenario. For now they are talking about "support"
Is this a troll?

Please explain how France is going to fight in a TW scenario. Are they going to send their formidable Armada just outside of China's shores and attack China?.....................

France's wanna-be little Napoleon Macron, has slim capability of involving France to this issue

Next time, you are going to tell me that Germany will be involved? I am eagerly awaiting their also formidable navy and airforce to travel half the world before fighting China at it's backyard
 

weig2000

Captain
This is certainly a great way to show respect, lol. Also go your way with these superficialities and shallowness

I show respect to people who deserve it, who are most of the members here; I occasionally call out people who have repeatedly and consistently demonstrated annoying and nonsensical behaviors.

I've been around SDF long enough, and my track records speak for what I said above.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Is this a troll?
Do you think you can predict what could happen or not?
Please explain how France is going to fight in a TW scenario. Are they going to send their formidable Armada just outside of China's shores and attack China?.....................
Intelligence support...
France's wanna-be little Napoleon Macron, has slim capability of involving France to this issue

Next time, you are going to tell me that Germany will be involved? I am eagerly awaiting their also formidable navy and airforce to travel half the world before fighting China at it's backyard
Germany army is a joke.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Oh My goodness, just see how the two other great power RU and US deal with these sort of things. Go educate yourself


UK and FR are not going to fight with CN. They preparing to support US in a war with CN, not going to directly involve themselves.
Russia and U.S. two countries each with their own distinct histories not to mention in how they each employ military application(s) with respect to what they deem as their strategic A.O.R. The U.S. a country that's been unscathed with the savagery and ravages of war on the scale of destruction happened in WWI and WWII act can go around the world with it's military forces largely immune from the psychological effects from such devastation which obviously results in their cavalier intentions to use nuclear weapons be it tactical or otherwise. China for a lot of the posters here knows first hand the brutalities and savagery of war first hand and the humiliation of subjugation that comes after it's defeat. Therefore it's military use of force and it's subsequent military strategies has always been about "Active Defense" it's not interested in taking an inch of land or territories from other countries all she wants is strategic space and buffer from it's adversaries i.e. Korean War, 1962 Indian border war, Sino-Soviet skirmish, Sino-Vietnam War of 1979.

Russia under the leadership of Putin learned it's bitter lesson ever since the dissolution of Soviet Russia when it tried so hard to be liked by the west, adopting whatever "shock doctrine" economic prescriptions then Jefferey Sachs and his economic acolytes pushed much to the detrimental effects towards Russian people which saw a massive dropped with their life expectancy and the humiliation it wrought upon them. Putin reversed that but the west led by the U.S. doesn't seem to want to understand and appreciate Russian "history" because it subsequent actions bear fruit from the NATO expansion, the Georgian 2008 war, the Ukraine 2014 coup which precipitated the annexation of Crimea and the breaking away of Donbas republic.

You asked me to look into Russian actions, well their actions of waging war against Georgia in 2008 - defeating then Pres. Shalikashvilis misadventures in South Ossetia - defeating the American trained and equipped forces in 5 days did not prevent other countries within her periphery to lean more towards the west side now did it? Otherwise, as I pointed out, the 2014 Maidan incident wouldn't have happened and the subsequent too numerous to count sanctions that's been leveled against Russia making her economy not exactly the envy of Europe.

What the Chinese is doing is obviously different for geopolitical, geographical, and economic reasons. And I for one prefer their greyzone tactic that adopting either the Russian approach or the American approach which doesn't show any semblance of some kind of winning strategy other than it keeps on threatening to blow up the entire planet if she doesn't get her way i.e. Cuban Missile Crisis, 1958 of nuclear preemption plan against both the Chinese military and Chinese civilization.

Now, how about you actually elucidate us with your grand strategic plan or understanding of current Chinese geopolitical and military challenge and distill it to us in such a way mental midgets like myself can easily digest to understand.
 

spring2017

New Member
Registered Member
Escobar wants a Kim Jung Un type of response. Fire a few missile over the bow, declare victory and shoot anyone that does not agree. This will validate the NK regimes' approach to diplomacy, compromise China's standing in world stage and help bring NK and China closer. That appears to be the motivation as he seeks to constantly overhype minor incident to further inflame tension.
When did NK do that? Applause is in order if they did that to a U.S. warship.

While most people here are smart enough to see through MSM propaganda about China, why believe their propaganda on North Korea? Such a small country under world-wide imperialist economic embargo and military threat, and still manage to survive and develop nuclear missiles.

That really demonstrate the superiority of socialist system (albeit very primitive one), which is what drives fear into the world supper capitalist power U.S.A. And in war against the U.S. aggression, NK is probably the only one that will fight along with China (no, not Russia).

That's why the U.S. wants to destroy NK and substage Sino-NK relationship. Don't fall for it.
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
When did NK do that? Applause is in order if they did that to a U.S. warship.

While most people here are smart enough to see through MSM propaganda about China, why believe their propaganda on North Korea? Such a small country under world-wide imperialist economic embargo and military threat, and still manage to survive and develop nuclear missiles.

That really demonstrate the superiority of socialist system (albeit very primitive one), which is what drives fear into the world supper capitalist power U.S.A. And in war against the U.S. aggression, NK is probably the only one that will fight along with China (no, not Russia).

That's why the U.S. wants to destroy NK and substage Sino-NK relationship. Don't fall for it.
I would say NK is China's little brother and is the ONLY country that China will enter war to help it

There is no way that China will let NK burn and get conquered.

That Kim though is not that bright isn't he. Like my man you got China next door, lets do business and grow NK (in the dark ofc due to UN sanctions)

However I liked his love letters sent to Trump haha
 

escobar

Brigadier
I show respect to people who deserve it, who are most of the members here; I occasionally call out people who have repeatedly and consistently demonstrated annoying and nonsensical behaviors.

I've been around SDF long enough, and my track records speak for what I said above.
I do not care about your respect. If you don't have nothing to say on this subject, spare me from your comments. Or better put me on your ignore list.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Russia and U.S. two countries each with their own distinct histories not to mention in how they each employ military application(s) with respect to what they deem as their strategic A.O.R. The U.S. a country that's been unscathed with the savagery and ravages of war on the scale of destruction happened in WWI and WWII act can go around the world with it's military forces largely immune from the psychological effects from such devastation which obviously results in their cavalier intentions to use nuclear weapons be it tactical or otherwise. China for a lot of the posters here knows first hand the brutalities and savagery of war first hand and the humiliation of subjugation that comes after it's defeat. Therefore it's military use of force and it's subsequent military strategies has always been about "Active Defense" it's not interested in taking an inch of land or territories from other countries all she wants is strategic space and buffer from it's adversaries i.e. Korean War, 1962 Indian border war, Sino-Soviet skirmish, Sino-Vietnam War of 1979.

Russia under the leadership of Putin learned it's bitter lesson ever since the dissolution of Soviet Russia when it tried so hard to be liked by the west, adopting whatever "shock doctrine" economic prescriptions then Jefferey Sachs and his economic acolytes pushed much to the detrimental effects towards Russian people which saw a massive dropped with their life expectancy and the humiliation it wrought upon them. Putin reversed that but the west led by the U.S. doesn't seem to want to understand and appreciate Russian "history" because it subsequent actions bear fruit from the NATO expansion, the Georgian 2008 war, the Ukraine 2014 coup which precipitated the annexation of Crimea and the breaking away of Donbas republic.

You asked me to look into Russian actions, well their actions of waging war against Georgia in 2008 - defeating then Pres. Shalikashvilis misadventures in South Ossetia - defeating the American trained and equipped forces in 5 days did not prevent other countries within her periphery to lean more towards the west side now did it? Otherwise, as I pointed out, the 2014 Maidan incident wouldn't have happened and the subsequent too numerous to count sanctions that's been leveled against Russia making her economy not exactly the envy of Europe.

What the Chinese is doing is obviously different for geopolitical, geographical, and economic reasons. And I for one prefer their greyzone tactic that adopting either the Russian approach or the American approach which doesn't show any semblance of some kind of winning strategy other than it keeps on threatening to blow up the entire planet if she doesn't get her way i.e. Cuban Missile Crisis, 1958 of nuclear preemption plan against both the Chinese military and Chinese civilization.

Now, how about you actually elucidate us with your grand strategic plan or understanding of current Chinese geopolitical and military challenge and distill it to us in such a way mental midgets like myself can easily digest to understand.
I'am just talking about how US and RU react when they sent plane or Ship near each other coast. Neither talk about "expelling"...
 
When did NK do that? Applause is in order if they did that to a U.S. warship.

While most people here are smart enough to see through MSM propaganda about China, why believe their propaganda on North Korea? Such a small country under world-wide imperialist economic embargo and military threat, and still manage to survive and develop nuclear missiles.

That really demonstrate the superiority of socialist system (albeit very primitive one), which is what drives fear into the world supper capitalist power U.S.A. And in war against the U.S. aggression, NK is probably the only one that will fight along with China (no, not Russia).

That's why the U.S. wants to destroy NK and substage Sino-NK relationship. Don't fall for it.
NK never fired a missile over the bow of a US warship precisely because US warship never dared to come close enough for this to happen.
NK however did fire a missile over Misawa Air Base and Japan multiple times.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That is the diplomacy and rhetoric Escobar is proposing and consistent throughout his numerous posting. The main theme in his post is China is weak in responses and PR and need to double down on escalating tension just like his great leader. He would constantly post random inconsequential inflammatory tweets to agitate readers here to respond in anger. His interest does not aligned with China's interest to find a proportional and rational response to world events. His interest is to escalate tension with an ulterior motive of forcing China to align with countries such as North Korea, no matter how despicable that country's leader is.
 

spring2017

New Member
Registered Member
NK however did fire a missile over Misawa Air Base and Japan multiple times.
The BBC news report says the ballistic missile was "770km" up in the air, did that violate any international law?
NK has every right to test ballistic missiles, in face of U.S. military threat.

North Korea, no matter how despicable that country's leader is.
Who says NK's leader is despicable? The capitalist corporate media? Yeah right. he is certainly much more honorable than, say, any U.S. president, who has the blood of countless innocent people all over the world on their hands.
 
Top