China's SCS Strategy Thread

[voyager1]

Yes. I want to hear what type of response he propose and what consequence he expects.

X: "Biden you hear me? Yes dis is Xi"
"We surrender"

B: "Pardon?"

X:"I said SURRENDER, did you get it?

B:"Com' on man! Are playing a prank to this old man? Gods sake Xi, pull yourself together"

X: "No! Dis time is serious. You passed a little ship near my country and I got bullied from these old men in the Politburo so I decided to surrender and quit"
"I will teach these old monsters bullying me. They wanted to throw a nuclear missile as a response but I declined and everything went downhill from there "
- Relevant telephone records on 22/05/2021 when China announced unconditional surrender to the US,
History: How a Cold War was unusually won by US, 4th Edition

 

[Dolcevita]

X: "Biden you hear me? Yes dis is Xi"
"We surrender"

B: "Pardon?"

X:"I said SURRENDER, did you get it?

B:"Com' on man! Are playing a prank to this old man? Gods sake Xi, pull yourself together"

X: "No! Dis time is serious. You passed a little ship near my country and I got bullied from these old men in the Politburo so I decided to surrender and quit"
"I will teach these old monsters bullying me. They wanted to throw a nuclear missile as a response but I declined and everything went downhill from there "
- Relevant telephone records on 22/05/2021 when China announced unconditional surrender to the US,
History: How a Cold War was unusually won by US, 4th Edition

I think he likes the name calling style of PR. Below example is more his PR style for countering US.
Dotard is still applicable for the current administration.

 

[Bellum_Romanum]

@Bellum_Romanum bro Richard Javad Heydarian just like Christian Esguerra are being listen to by the MSM due to their used of pretty English, most of his research material is sourced from website of known neo con institution and they provide him grant money to produce a bogus report. Bro he had no originalities and most of his thesis is plagiarized.

Plagiarized? Then why is that m..n still being called a professor? Or is the accusation not been proven yet?

 

[Bellum_Romanum]

lol nonsense. Bringing out a stupid PR is not wanting Kim Jung Un type of response.

So what would constitute an appropriate level response for PLAN to do in your opinion? I have been reading your posts and tbh it comes across low key dismissive of Chinese military or of China's approach in any given strategic areas for that matter. But I have yet to actually ready anything substantive and original from you other than playing this Gordon Ramsay, Judge Judy, Simon Cowell shtick of low key condescension.

If you think or assumes for a minute that Britain, France, or Japan has a fighting chance against the Chinese navy in it's own backyard then I would want to know how and where do you get such audacious conclusions from.

 

[ansy1968]

Plagiarized? Then why is that m..n still being called a professor? Or is the accusation not been proven yet?

@Bellum_Romanum bro read his report, its a mishmash of neo con article put together and claim his owned (being a local certainly gives him some credence) , he had a grant/sponsor from ASPI (bro my proof is that he had a year of residency in Sydney) regarding the SCS issue, so he is a tool of American propaganda. Bro I'm a graduate of DLSU (De LaSalle University) its a Jesuit run institution that cater for the Elites and the middle class. He being a professor there is part of US indoctrination. Our history is distorted by the American and he is part of that. And now you know why most educated people here are so pro US, I had the same experience trying to fit in but the problem and reality is so stark that you question what they teaches you.

And a side note he never interviewed Roberto Tiglao who had first hand info regarding the Panatag incident instead called on Carpio and Del Rosario its a one sided affair. So he had an agenda, if he claim to be a researcher he needed to hear both side. And his questioning and intents are so eerily similar to that of an American Neo Con.

 

[escobar]

So what would constitute an appropriate level response for PLAN to do in your opinion? I have been reading your posts and tbh it comes across low key dismissive of Chinese military or of China's approach in any given strategic areas for that matter. But I have yet to actually ready anything substantive and original from you other than playing this Gordon Ramsay, Judge Judy, Simon Cowell shtick of low key condescension.

Oh My goodness, just see how the two other great power RU and US deal with these sort of things. Go educate yourself

If you think or assumes for a minute that Britain, France, or Japan has a fighting chance against the Chinese navy in it's own backyard then I would want to know how and where do you get such audacious conclusions from.

UK and FR are not going to fight with CN. They preparing to support US in a war with CN, not going to directly involve themselves.

 

[Gatekeeper]

So what would constitute an appropriate level response for PLAN to do in your opinion? I have been reading your posts and tbh it comes across low key dismissive of Chinese military or of China's approach in any given strategic areas for that matter. But I have yet to actually ready anything substantive and original from you other than playing this Gordon Ramsay, Judge Judy, Simon Cowell shtick of low key condescension.

If you think or assumes for a minute that Britain, France, or Japan has a fighting chance against the Chinese navy in it's own backyard then I would want to know how and where do you get such audacious conclusions from.

Nailed it on the head!

UK and FR are not going to fight with CN. They preparing to support US in a war with CN, not going to directly involve themselves

UK and France are not going to fight with China?

Bowowow! At no times since WW2 did U.K. and the French not fought along side the U.S. in conflicts US is involved in and requested their allies to join in. (Granada and Panama US didn't request help from allies. And suez U.S. didn't approved).

Do you really think they dare say no? Tell me how did it end in Korea and Vietnam?

 

[weig2000]

You need insight for this ? Why say you expel a ship when it is not true? Or you don't know what expels mean?
It is called low level PR

That may or may not be a low level PR - this is actually not called PR, you don't understand the concept of PR - but you definitely demonstrate your low IQ all too often. You think you're being a smart ass by trolling people here with your repetitive and clueless one liners. People better have at least some rudimentary understanding of the international politics and diplomatic speak before they post frequently here on the subject. You don't appear to have passed that test.

Please, show some respect to the readers and self-respect.

 

[escobar]

Nailed it on the head!



UK and France are not going to fight with China?

Bowowow! At no times since WW2 did U.K. and the French not fought along side the U.S. in conflicts US is involved in and requested their allies to join in. (Granada and Panama US didn't request help from allies. And suez U.S. didn't approved).

Do you really think they dare say no? Tell me how did it end in Korea and Vietnam?

FR were not with US in Irak. They may ending (or not) fight along side the US in a TW scenario. For now they are talking about "support"

 

[escobar]

That may or may not be a low level PR - this is actually not called PR, you don't understand the concept of PR - but you definitely demonstrate your low IQ all too often. You think you're being a smart ass by trolling people here with your repetitive and clueless one liners. People better have at least some rudimentary understanding of the international politics and diplomatic speak before they post frequently here on the subject. You don't appear to have passed that test.

This is certainly a great way to show respect, lol. Also go your way with these superficialities and shallowness