China's SCS Strategy Thread

V

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
The US warship was definetely not expelled

But it also didn't have any qualification to stay there (PLAN dominates that area)

So its basically all a big PR game.

US says "Freedom of Navigation" but lol, US knows that it cant truly traverse this are without the PLAN sinking its ships

And China cant expel a ship. Because if it wants, the US ship can stay there indefinitely and China doesn't dare to do anything against it

So, meaningless PR game. Everyone knows that China dominates that area
 
J

jimmyjames30x30

Junior Member
Registered Member
voyager1 said:
The US warship was definetely not expelled

But it also didn't have any qualification to stay there (PLAN dominates that area)

So its basically all a big PR game.

US says "Freedom of Navigation" but lol, US knows that it cant truly traverse this are without the PLAN sinking its ships

And China cant expel a ship. Because if it wants, the US ship can stay there indefinitely and China doesn't dare to do anything against it

So, meaningless PR game. Everyone knows that China dominates that area
Click to expand...

Well, this is a very silly game. Just as you pointed out: China dominates the area, regardless of what a couple of USN or European ships do.

However, in a highly possible scenario, China could simply send the commissioned 003 strike group, along with a LHD+LPD task group to the Mediterranean's, deploying via Russian and Syrian bases. And this will tie down the bulk of the European Navy as well as USN ships in Europe. All 003 and the 31 (or another 075 LHD) has to do is to sail regularly between St. Petersburg and the Black Sea. And ideally, 003 could station Russian Naval Aviation units as part of its airwing, get them to fly catapult J-15 and KJ-600.

This is very simple for China. But for NATO, this would be a challenge unseen for decades.

Of course, if China really does this, it will worsen China-Europe relations, and it will also push France to introduce its new nuclear powered carriers earlier.
 
Last edited:
D

Dolcevita

Major
Gatekeeper said:
Yes. Thanks for your insight. And thanks for your English lesson. It's...... appreciated.

Now how about your insight of this dog and pony show? ie: is it right the U.S. should do this? And what should China do about it?
Click to expand...

Escobar wants a Kim Jung Un type of response. Fire a few missile over the bow, declare victory and shoot anyone that does not agree. This will validate the NK regimes' approach to diplomacy, compromise China's standing in world stage and help bring NK and China closer. That appears to be the motivation as he seeks to constantly overhype minor incident to further inflame tension.
 
escobar

escobar

Brigadier
voyager1 said:
The US warship was definetely not expelled

But it also didn't have any qualification to stay there (PLAN dominates that area)

So its basically all a big PR game.

US says "Freedom of Navigation" but lol, US knows that it cant truly traverse this are without the PLAN sinking its ships

And China cant expel a ship. Because if it wants, the US ship can stay there indefinitely and China doesn't dare to do anything against it

So, meaningless PR game. Everyone knows that China dominates that area
Click to expand...
US qualification is its military power. PLA not weak there but don't really "dominate" these area. If there is a shooting war there, every side has the capability to detect track and engage other side assets but the outcome is not clear.
 
escobar

escobar

Brigadier
Dolcevita said:
Escobar wants a Kim Jung Un type of response. Fire a few missile over the bow, declare victory and shoot anyone that does not agree. This will validate the NK regimes' approach to diplomacy, compromise China's standing in world stage and help bring NK and China closer. That appears to be the motivation as he seeks to constantly overhype minor incident to further inflame tension.
Click to expand...
lol nonsense. Bringing out a stupid PR is not wanting Kim Jung Un type of response.
 
Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
escobar said:
See what RU and US do and say in these situation
Click to expand...

Eh. So what me do get an insight of your opinion (don't forget we valued your opinon whether we agreed with it or not). I need to see what the RU and U.S. do and say on this matter. Very strange? Why don't you give it to us straight since you're here?

escobar said:
lol nonsense. Bringing out a stupid PR is not wanting Kim Jung Un type of response.
Click to expand...

This is because you still hasn't given us your insight and wisdom. So we xould only speculate. At times your writing remained me of another member we had here. I think jura is the name.

Dolcevita said:
Why do you keep bringing up random inconsequential tweet to overhype trivial nonsense? What relevance do random tweets have on Chinese PR or response?
Click to expand...

Exactly. Keep posting stuff we could all find ourselves. But when we do post we add opinons. Whereas majority of his post is one liner. It doesn't add anything to the table.
 
D

Dolcevita

Major
Gatekeeper said:
Eh. So what me do get an insight of your opinion (don't forget we valued your opinon whether we agreed with it or not). I need to see what the RU and U.S. do and say on this matter. Very strange? Why don't you give it to us straight since you're here?



This is because you still grant
Click to expand...
Yes. I want to hear what type of response he propose and what consequence he expects.

escobar said:
If you can't see it, then go your way.
Click to expand...
You still have not explain your end-goal and motivation. You have not stated your position and explain what your expect to accomplish. And somehow you want us to see IT, whatever IT is?

Please respond to Gatekeeper and me and do not run away with just this "go your way" nonsense reply.
We all value your insight.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top