There is a difference between researchers and researchers. Most of the technicians in labs are Chinese as well. Most of them can get work done beautifully. However, when it comes to creative thinking, they become a little stagnant. I think this is caused by the filtering effect of Chinese education system. Most of the creative people don't care too much about the boring education system in China and that makes them unable to compete with those who diligently obey orders and study hard for everything thrown their way. Not that there is anything wrong with studying hard.
I think that while it is true that there does appear to be a lack of creativity and original thinking in those who have gone through the education system in China, it is to a much less degree than what you seem to think, and I also disagree about the cause.
I have to agree with Solarz here Vesicles, a lot of the time, those Chinese researchers are not asking because they do not know what to do next, but they are asking to get re-affirmation from their superiors that what they are doing is what is desired. It is partly a lack of confidence, as I observed before, but also part cultural, as they do not want to appear to be a hothead upstart who does not care about the views and ideas of their superiors/elders. There might also be some bad habits from passing exams mixed in, as school children who ask the most questions most often tend to do better at exams than the more independent sort who prefer to go it alone and come up with their own ideas and solutions.
This effect is amplified in the Chinese, extreme pressure, huge classroom style of teaching. The students are under so much pressure that the most time efficient method of studying is to just take what the teacher tells you as the absolute truth and learn that instead of questioning it, challenging it and figuring out why that is the case, because the student simply have too much workload to spare too much time on such 'idle' thinking, and the teachers tend to have too many students to teach to properly explain things even if a student did ask such questions.
This brings us neatly onto the real reason I see as the cause of this lack of imagination and creativity - the pressures placed on the students and the habits they foster.
As I mentioned in the previous post, I admire western high-school education precisely because it promotes students to not only learn why something is the way it is, but most critically, to question why that is the cast, and thus gain a far more in-depth understanding and this generates real interest in a subject, and is a key stepping stone to developing good independent analytical and creative skills, and such preparation is great at equipping students with the critical studying skills needed to make the most of their university education and working lift after formal education.
Sadly, that is something that I feel the Chinese education system could improve massively on.
I think that the current system would be acceptable up to secondary school, as by that time, pretty much all the students would have an extremely solid foundation of a very wide range of key knowledge and world-beating literacy and numeracy skills.
High school in China should be reformed to follow the western approach, whereby the students are taught and encouraged to think critically and creatively and independently to make the transition to university life much less extreme, and also to given them more confidence to think critically and creatively as well as to seize the initiative.
However, the sad reality of the fact is that sweeping educational reform in China is very unlikely because of the amazing results attained. China ranked first in all fields in the most recent Programme for International Students Assessment (PISA) rankings.
Would anyone consider sweeping changes to a system that seem to work so 'well' at present? Especially since the changes I have in mind will probably be pretty expensive to implement, and may well actually local China's scores and rankings, if only initially.
All too many Chinese parents are sadly falling into the misconception that western universities are somehow better at fostering creativity and gives a better education and spend exorbitant amounts of money to send their children abroad so that they might receive this 'superior' education.
However, IMHO, it is high school that makes the critical difference, and western universities do not differ all that much in the way they run their programmes as Chinese universities. If anything, sending the child alone and to a completely foreign culture with only mediocre english language skills tend to exaggerate the already large difference between high school education in China and university life, and amplify the already well noted tendency for oriental students to be shy and passive, and thus can be far more harmful for the child's healthy development and education than if they had just gone to university in China.
I think if children are to travel abroad for a western education, they should either go early, at high school and stay till university, or they should go later, for a masters or PHD, MBA, when they have had time to adapt to the massive change in educational style in a much more familiar cultural and language environment.