China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?
- Thread starter MrCrazyBoyRavi
- Start date
- Status
What data? That the USA is seen to be way more favorable than China despite the geopolitical disaster called Trump by same dataset? Sorry, you need to be better than that.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
What are you reading? LOL That's all Indian news making stuff up cus they're still convulsing over their Ladakh defeat. Check your sources next time. The Sino-Russian relationship is humming along perfectly.
Last edited:
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
This one. I know that people who are anti-China are basically blowing their fuses when it comes to logic but saying "What data?" after being shown a chart (made by an American organization)? LOL Tsk tsk
Where in that data set did you a comparison with global views of the USA? Can you read charts? Are you at least able to read the English title?
Sorry, you need to read data better than that LOLOL
These are your sad little responses that avoid 90% of my argument only to get the other 10% wrong? That's not even a response; you can't save face like that. You're embarrassing yourself further.
Last edited:
Err... dude I don’t actually know anything about the Bhutan case, but from what is written in the article itself, it seems more like a political manoeuvre the Chinese used in attempting to embarrass India via the Indian representative of Bhutan and various countries.
This is my conjecture based on what is written in the article, basically the Chinese are saying to Bhutan and various countries, the Indians can’t represent your interest on the international stage because the India don’t know or care about their respective interests and in this case the Chinese isn’t wrong, since the Indian representative didn’t know enough to outright discredit the claim made by the Chinese representative.
As for Wionews, I don’t think they are remotely credible enough to dignify a detailed response, every single article or video, I have ever seen on their channel is extremely exaggerated, and without an actual China gov official comment anything said by Wionews cannot be a credible claim of disputed territory status in the view of China and no sources are ever given. Plus it is not inaccurate to say that some Russian territory has actually been in the Qing dynasty, considering the territory was annexed by the Russians from the Qing in the 1800s, that is just history.
If we take nationalists claims over official gov positions then half of Asia is in territorial dispute with India.
This one. I know that people who are anti-China are basically blowing their fuses when it comes to logic but saying "What data?" after being shown a chart (made by an American organization)? LOL Tsk tsk
Where in that data set did you a comparison with global views of the USA? Can you read charts? Are you at least able to read the English title?
Sorry, you need to read data better than that LOLOL
These are your sad little responses that avoid 90% of my argument only to get the other 10% wrong? That's not even a response; you can't save face like that. You're embarrassing yourself further.
You really need to improve your attitude. Your quoted source provides a clear pro American view on a world wide scale.
I mean I'm fully aware that on a board like sinodefence there is alot of patriotism/nationalism/etc. running when discussing such subjects. But the fact that people argues like crazy about western this western that shows the inferiority complex China suffers, while being incapable of Realpolitik or Weltpolitik.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
My attitude adjusts itself to the intellectual level of the arguments laid out by the other party.
I'm quoting a pro-US source that is talking about China's rise in popularity. Where on that data set are you pointing to that says America is viewed more favorably than China? You can't read a chart, and you can't worm out of it, sorry.
Since it's not on that chart, I'll give you another data set to directly refute your assertion, and this data is pre-BLM:
China just overtook the US in global leadership approval
Mar 14, 2019
- The median approval of China's leadership across 134 countries was 34%, rising from 31% in the past two years, Gallup said.
- The US's standing is at 31%, the lowest for any of the past three US presidents' administrations.
- Gallup says the ratings could have implications for 'soft power' and billions in US trade.
That's according to a ...
Such terrible pot-calling-the-kettle-black logic. This is a geopolitics thread so how does one talk only about China here? On the other hand, you came to talk about China, and Trump has nothing to say except China when it comes to his COVID response, showing the inferiority complex that you and the POTUS suffer when it comes to China.
What you seek (or rather, seek not to find) is in the news and in the data I have shown you, not in your imagination.
Last edited:
You're getting a far kinder and gentler attitude than you deserve.
You basically just repeat the same nonsense and ignoring my posts. I mean how you refuse to look at the data of the source you are quoting that the USA still enjoys way more favorable ratings than the USA especially in Asia despite the poor actual administration.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Repeating nonsense and ignoring points? LOLOL You have got to be talking about yourself! What of yours did I ignore? (I think you've actually avoided answering the entirety of my post #595 here for starters: China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?)
I do point-to-point rebuttals of your posts careful to miss nothing, because everything you say is another opportunity to demonstrate how wrong you are. Honestly, your posts are so short and completely devoid of substance that there's nothing to ignore. I give you data and you just say no, in your mind, or in some version of data cherry-picked (only these nations count, etc...) for what you want to see, it's the opposite of a 134 nation poll, which clearly shows China pull ahead of the US in global approval.
It's clear you've got no way to refute what I'm saying, because all your posts avoid all the points in my post (never a point-to-point response) and reply with some little hazy, non-data-backed general statement hoping it'll make it look like you still have valid things to say.
Last edited:
- Status