Is this museum in Mianyang or Guangyuan? Does it the museum provide the weight to yield ratio of the old warheads?Official models of DF-5 and DF-21/JL-1 warheads
Source: China's nuclear museum
View attachment 118104
It is in Zitong County of Mianyang.Is this museum in Mianyang or Guangyuan?
ofc no. Both of warheads are on par with US and Soviet in their early-mid 1960s design.Does it the museum provide the weight to yield ratio of the old warheads?
A2786/23 NOTAMN Q) ZXXX/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3858N10942E022 A) ZBPE ZLHW B) 2309170236 C) 2309171434 D) 0236-0334,1336-1434 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3908E10917-N3906E11008-N3848E11007-N3850E10916,BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2817/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3936N10142E034 A) ZLHW B) 2309170225 C) 2309170500 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3951E10103-N3919E10105-N3922E10222-N3954E10220 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2823/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3934N10146E034 A) ZLHW B) 2309170225 C) 2309170500 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3948E10107-N3916E10109-N3919E10226-N3952E10224 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2815/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3921N09634E029 A) ZLHW B) 2309170226 C) 2309170458 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY:N3935E09601-N3903E09605-N3907E09707-N3939E09704 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2821/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3914N09634E030 A) ZLHW B) 2309170226 C) 2309170458 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3929E09601-N3856E09605-N3901E09707-N3933E09704 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2813/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3943N10502E013 A) ZLHW B) 2309170225 C) 2309170448 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY:N3951E10449-N3935E10450-N3935E10514-N3952E10513 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
A2819/23 NOTAMN Q) ZLHW/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3942N10459E013 A) ZLHW B) 2309170225 C) 2309170448 E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3950E10447-N3934E10448-N3934E10512-N3951E10511 BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL. F) SFC G) UNL
As a complete nobody that knows nothing, the second one almost looks as if they are trying to expand the range of possible targets a single ICBM can hit within a trip. Perhaps to complicate things for missile defense networks? Anybody feel free to correct me if I am way off base.ICBM tests went on September 17, still not clear whether it was from Taiyuan or Jilantai.
Which set it apart from previous tests is, there were actually two ICBM tests simultaneously and their drop zones were almost identical except very slight difference. Overall they had seven drop zones.
View attachment 119036
The second one is a werido, never seen such drop zones like this before.
View attachment 119037
NOTAM raw info:
Another interesting find during digging into a journal published in 2019, possibly PBV technology related.
Key takeway:
1. CASC developed a 10kN upper stage engine a.k.a Post boost vehicle in 2018 with a chamber pressure 4MPa.
2. It has already been tested in a weapon system in September 2018.
3. Very likely to be designed for an ICBM PBV.
Longer thought:
The journal also stated that there were two engines using carbon fiber for their nozzles in China as of 2019. The first one is a 2.4kN one, conducted its first flight in 2013. I suspect this could be the DF-41 test in Dec 2013. The second one was YZ-3, upper stage for Long March 2D, a 5kN one. And it was said that they have already developed a 10kN upper stage engine in 2006 but it never came into production.
For comparison:
Engine RS-14 RS-34 RD-866 2013 Engine 2018 Engine Thrust 1.39 kN 11.70 kN 5.20 kN + 16 x 116 N 2.4kN 10kN Missile Minuteman Peacekeeper RT-23 Likely to be DF-41 Unknown
5 kN 发动机真空比冲达到了 307 ~ 308 s,于 2018 年成功完成首飞任务 ,在轨累计点火 1 034 s。
10 kN 发动机完成了多轮试车,真空比冲由 305 s 提高至 315 s 以上。
Engine | RS-14 | RS-34 | RD-866 | RD-869 | 2013 Engine | 2018 Engine |
Thrust | 1.39 kN | 11.70 kN | 5.20 kN + 16 x 116 N | 20.47 kN | 2.4kN | 10kN |
Isp | 315s | 308s | 306s | 313s | 305s - 308s | 315s |
Missile | Minuteman | Peacekeeper | RT-23 | SS-18 Satan | Likely to be DF-41 | Unknown |
Are all of China’s warheads deployed (I’d hope, so), or do they maintain a portion in reserve?
1. In 2022, Beijing continued its rapid nuclear expansion, and DoD estimates that the PRC possessed more than 500 operational nuclear warheads as of May 2023—on track to exceed previous projections.
2. The PRC is fielding the DF-5C, a silo-based liquid-fueled ICBM armed with a nuclear warhead with a multi-megaton yield (wtf??). The PRC is fielding the longer-range JL-3 SLBMs on its current JIN class SSBN, rendering them capable of ranging the continental United States from PRC littoral waters.