China Flanker thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

BLUEJACKET

Banned Idiot
Lastly, if China builds navalized Su-33, the quantities may not be enough to justify the development costs. In order to lower the cost, the only concievable way is to make the new airframe standard not just for navalized J-11s but for all J-11s. Kind of like the F-18 still uses its navalized airframe even for squadrons and countries that don't use carriers.
It would make sense if they want to use all J-11 for carrier ops. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
air forces aren't "navalized"- they've got regular landing gear, no heavy duty tail hook, & no strengthened airframe, just like the MiG-29 compared with MiG-29K. If, on the other hand, they don't plan to deploy very large numbers, navalising existing airframes will make more economic sense, IMO!
 

eecsmaster

Junior Member
ever heard of F-18L? That was the land based F-18 with a lightened airframe. Northrop never sold any because McDonnell Douglas would always end up offering the F-18A in competition, and the project got canned in the courts after that.

What I'm trying to say here is that standardization of airframes do not have to be exact, just close enough.
 

Chengdu J-10

Junior Member
But that's exactly what's happening now. Russia is offering the PLAAF its latest and best. However, the PLAAF may or may not be interested, and as usual, always has skepticism about the validity of claims, the ability to meet certification and the promptness of delivery, plus the usual price tag.
Yeah about that post I made that you replied to and corrected (russia selling lastest equipment to china) I had typed the wrong thing on the post. It was mean't to say that Russian's should've offered their latest and most advance equipment to the PLAAF earlier. Offering the PLAAF the latest equipment now is a bit too late, reason being is China's booming aerospace industry. If the Russians offered them their latest equipment earlier the PLAAF would've bought them. But now since they are old and the PLAAF are more self reliant they are not so eager as the were earlier. A good example is the Tu-22M3 were the PLAAF had requested them earlier but the Russian's said no. But now the Russian's say yes but the Chinese are not that willing anymore. If Russia offered them earlier the Russians would've gotten quite a big amount of money for the purchase of the Tu-22M3.
 

Scratch

Captain
Chengdu J-10
Russian's should've offered their latest and most advance equipment to the PLAAF earlier
Perhaps Russia didn't expect China to come along that fast. Sell them something good but not the best, to keep them away(technical); and a few years later sell them more advanced systems to make money again. Well if that was the intention, it went wrong ...

That
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
still looks odd to me with that seat-config

Crobato
The Su-33KK which I assume will be the designation for the Chinese planes, will have to incorporate refinements and hindsight experiences, and so it will be different from the original Su-33.

Will it come with that “Zhuk-MSFEh” aircraft radar that was implemented in test aircrafts after the "succesfull bench tests and revision" some 3 years ago ?
Reason for my question is because of weapon use. Russian AShM with russian radar, chinese AShM implemented, or chinese radar ?
 

Shulin Jiang

Banned Idiot
I think China should stop buying Russian planes, Russians can not be trusted, they sell old, cheap, and obslebe product to China. I think we should speed up the Super 10 project to replace the MKK. Also we should upgrade the J11 to improve its ground attack ability.
 

kunmingren

Junior Member
I think China should stop buying Russian planes, Russians can not be trusted, they sell old, cheap, and obslebe product to China. I think we should speed up the Super 10 project to replace the MKK. Also we should upgrade the J11 to improve its ground attack ability.


if those weapon platform are old cheap and obselet, doesnt that also mean the China is really stupid for wasting billions of dollars on them? mkk are more capable than any other plane in China. Super 10 should be something thats on parr with F-22 or F-35, which means they are going to be expensive and very few deployment. Su-27 and its variants can still have a place in plaaf as a low tech combo to super-10.
 

BLUEJACKET

Banned Idiot
And there are also
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
&
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
with their associated missiles that China bought from Russia-all top of the line. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the Russians are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to sell China the most advanced & latest weapon systems for 3 reasons:
1. They may be used against them in the future land disputes;
2. Once the technology is out, further sales may not go ahead;
3. To avoid straining ties with the US, India & Japan.

Moscow has refrained from selling Beijing some of its most technologically advanced weapons systems, although this could change.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Russians are facing a dilemma: if they sell the latest arms, they may loose the Chinese market later; and if they sell substandard equipment, they may spurn PRC's domestic arms development and loose that market also!
 
Last edited:

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Will it come with that “Zhuk-MSFEh” aircraft radar that was implemented in test aircrafts after the "succesfull bench tests and revision" some 3 years ago ?
Reason for my question is because of weapon use. Russian AShM with russian radar, chinese AShM implemented, or chinese radar ?

I am kind of assuming that this topic is still particuarly being discussed by the negotiators.

1. PLAAF may be interested on Zhuk-MSFEh aka formerly known as Sokol. In March 2001, Sokol was cleared for China, which had expressed interest on this and the Zhuk line.

2. To counter its Phazotron rival, NIIP Tikhomirov is expected to counter by offering IRBIS.

3. Russians may want to insist on using Russian radar with Russian AshMs.

4. Chinese may have to insist on using Chinese radar with Chinese AshMs.

That Su-33UB still looks odd to me with that seat-config

It is said to improve pilot morale on longer trips, although I don't think the configuration is good for air combat for visibility reasons.

I do have a strong suspicion that China may have been secretly financing Su-33UB development due to odd circumstances and a suspicious timeline and the two seater config may be part of the requriement.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Chengdu J-10

Quote:
Russian's should've offered their latest and most advance equipment to the PLAAF earlier

(Scratch) Perhaps Russia didn't expect China to come along that fast. Sell them something good but not the best, to keep them away(technical); and a few years later sell them more advanced systems to make money again. Well if that was the intention, it went wrong ...

Yup that is a good explanation which I am inclined to.

But the other explanation I am most inclined to is that the so called latest and bestest Russian projects are actually more hype and marketing, half baked and are not full developed.

So even if you want them, they can't deliver in time, and request a large overlay so they can use money to actually finish the development.

If you feel that there is some scam going on, that is what I tend to incline.

Example, Russians displaying Kh-59MK antiship mission on MKK 502 prototype in Paris Air Show in 2001. But the missile actually never finished its development until 2006.

For what its worth, the MKK was quite ahead of what the Russians have in their armed forces. While the radar specs seem pedestrian compared to the other projects, it was on the other hand, better tested and certified. In 2000, the plane is completely certified and integrated with a whole gamut of weapons, some of these weapons are not integrated with BARS for example until 2005-2006.

Because of the certification (and lack of such on the others), the RuAF chose the MKK system as their basis for the Su-27SM upgrade for their own forces. So in fact, the Russians have a good opinion about the MKK system, deeming well enough for their own armed forces. Which is why they are in shock that the Chinese stopped the MKK buying and didn't go through with the SKM project, which was also financed by the Chinese.

In hindsight the Russians probably didn't expect that the Chinese would raise their sights higher and faster. What was okay for the RuAF, no longer was okay for the PLAAF.

There was also some dents on the MKK project. In the original specs, the Kh-31A was included, and even the 501 prototypes were flying the missile back in photos during year 2000. Apparently it really didn't work, and the Kh-31A functionality had to be rolled back and incorporated into the Su-30MK2. And the Russians probably charged for something they should have incorporated in the first place.

Another is the delay on the SAPSAN E pod. It should have been available back in 2001, but we only saw evidence of this in 2006, though the Sino Russian exercises did report the Su-30MKK dropping LGBs. Between that, there are many stories of its delay. Back in 2004, we never saw evidence of LGB being part of the MKK arms inventory, the LGB China bought from the Russians all end up in the JH-7A.

Suffice to say, won't you be disappointed you spend 37 million on a plane that didn't live up to its expectations? Failed to use antiship missile, failed to use even LGB properly?

At least the AL-31FNs, the Kilos and the new Sovs did manage to live up to their expectations (so far), and that was enough faith restoration to bring the Chinese back to the negotiation table, amidst other Russian bobos, the inability to complete the IL-76 contract, and the quality control problems of the RD-93 (5 rejects out of 15 engines delivered is bad).
 

mehdi

Junior Member
So Russia is the weak link, thanks crobato it surely explains a lot. China has more to gain from going it's own way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top