China Flanker Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.

escobar

Brigadier
Night Training

30175c27.jpg

d82c9069.jpg

d20dfb3d.jpg

e530ad98.jpg

1447c220.jpg

e9573a18.jpg

609a5e7a.jpg

4e56b86b.jpg

f2ba1dda.jpg
 

Quickie

Colonel
China also tried to put engines of their own on a second test J-20 vehicle, but the copycat of the Soviet engine AL-31F made by China is not in the same league as the Russian analogue for reliability and durability.
The real problem is both AL-31F and Chinese version are engines of the previous generation
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wrong. And, regarding the videos above, is all Russian news sources so inaccurate in their reporting?

Haven't you heard the news about the Chinese rebuilding the flanker engine including changing the fan blades to make them more reliable? This news came out direct from the mouth of Chinese officials and western observers quite some time back.
 

hmmwv

Junior Member
here is the proof


something even echoed by the americans

Proof of what? Are you seriously think anyone will take RT or CNN seriously on Chinese military matters? Those idiots didn't even believe the existence of a Chinese fifth gen project, they are just as reliable as the Russian media, wishful thinkers at best, outright liars IMO.
 

Engineer

Major
Look understand this, i am not interfax, RT news, Sukhoi, RuAF or what ever ego you associate me.


RT news only said


China requested the engine 117S when the Russian defence minister visited China in 2010.

Russia rejected the chinese proposal and instead offered the 117S only if they buy the whole Su-35 in large numbers and China signed an agreement protecting the intellectual property rights of the whole deal.

later reports said the negociations stalled.

Whenever Russian media made some claims about Chinese military, the opposite of those claims would be the truth. Just like how all those claims about China is buying Su-35 turn out to be lies when China's department of defense finally fed up and stated the claims are false. So, the truth behind those claims about China being interested in the 117S engine is this: Russia probably offered to sale 117S and China rejected.

Since the 117S most likely cost 10% of what the Su-35 costs, buying 50 Su-35 must be in the range 5 billion dollars.

For Russia a chinese proposal of buying 4-10 engines is not worthed even perhaps a buy of 100 engines for J-11Bs.
Sukhoi is unwilling to help a potential competitor and Pogyosan called to stop the sales of russian engines to China for even the FC-17 and Anatoli Isaykin from Rosoboronexport called to investigate the J-11B and in 2010 at Shuhai, Alexander Miheev also from Rosoboronexport was in talks with the Chinese side to investigate Chinese production of weapons that Russia considered were copycats without license

.


So is very likely Russia is unwilling to aid China unless a large amount of cash is paid by China.
If China is only willing to buy 4 engines, it shows all China has no desire to equip such engine to its aircraft. None whatsoever. So, your claim that China wanting to buy the engines for J-11B is contradicted by your very own statement. In fact, whether the engines are AL-31F or the more advanced 117S, there is no needs for China to acquire any, since J-11B is already being equipped with WS-10A engines.

Will Russia sell Su-35 to China only time will tell.
It doesn't matter whether Russia is willing to sale. The issue is China is not willing to buy.


Perhaps later Russia will sell Al-31M1s or Al-31M2s, but it seems after the J-11 license problems with China, Russia is much more wary of China and since Russia today is in a better economic situation, yes for the Russian side it might not be worthed the sale Su-35s if they do not cash a lot of money
If Russia is so ahead of China in aerospace technologies, Russia wouldn't be so wary about Chinese copying Russian products. In any case, licensing issue is only an excuse to rationalize why no Su-35 is being exported, so as to avoid admitting the reality that China has little interest in the aircraft.
 

Engineer

Major
Here are diagrams showing improvements made on Chinese Flanker variants over the years.
J-11A:
qV58I.jpg


J-11B block I:
CUs7k.jpg


J-11BS:
wsgtA.jpg


J-16:
n6kYD.jpg


Differences between J-15 and Su-33:
nns9w.jpg
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Wrong. And, regarding the videos above, is all Russian news sources so inaccurate in their reporting?

Haven't you heard the news about the Chinese rebuilding the flanker engine including changing the fan blades to make them more reliable? This news came out direct from the mouth of Chinese officials and western observers quite some time back.

Look i know you did not read the links i have provided otherwise you will know what Victor Mihailovich Chenkin thinks about WS-10.

To start i do not think you even know who is Victor Mihailovich Chepkin

В.М. Чепкин родился в 1933 году.
После окончания в 1957 году Московского авиационного института был направлен в Пермское моторостроительное КБ, где прошел путь от инженера-конструктора до главного конструктора. Под руководством П. Соловьева, он был главным конструктором выдающегося по своим параметрам двигателя "Д-30Ф6" для самого быстрого в мире истребителя-перехватчика "МиГ-31", способного летать со скоростью более 3000 км/ч.

В 1983 году Виктор Михайлович был назначен заместителем министра авиационной промышленности СССР по вопросам двигателестроения.

С августа 1984 года — генеральный конструктор — генеральный директор НПО "Сатурн" им. А. М. Люльки. Под его руководством успешно завершены конструкторско-доводочные работы и проведены государственные испытания турбореактивного двигателя "АЛ-31Ф". Виктор Михайлович возглавил работы по созданию турбореактивного двигателя пятого поколения "АЛ 41Ф" и модернизации "АЛ-31Ф".

this says he was born in 1933 worked for Perm engines on jet engine designs, later on the MiG-31`s engine D30F6, for Solovyov, worked as Chief designer in Saturn on the Al-41F.


So he is really a jet aircraft designer to give you an idea D-30F6 has a thrust yield of 15 tonnes, but he worked on other jet engines.
Китайский самолет — это точная копия нашего?

— Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф", автоматика вся наша. Покупать лицензию на производство двигателя они не стали, лишь купили лицензию на ремонт двигателя (естественно со всеми чертежами). А поскольку ремонт и производство, по сути, очень близки, китайцы все тщательно изучили и самостоятельно освоили производство. В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию, у меня лично никаких сомнений не было. Поэтому выход у нас один — сделать лучше. И мы сделали двигатель "117С". Пусть теперь они за нами погоняются!



He does praise the Chinese engineers skills

in fact he says " В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию"

In China they have very competent engineers and they will master the production of jet engines

Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф

he says yes WS-10 is not an exact copy of the Al-31 but the Chinese used Al-31 in the development of WS-10, in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31

This says the 117 engines increased the thrust of Al-31 20% without gaining weight
Накопленный таким образом за десять лет уникальнейший опыт мы опрокинули на модернизацию "АЛ-31Ф". В итоге родился двигатель "117". Даже простое приложение имеющихся наработок дало удивительный результат — тяга двигателя возросла с 12,5 тонн до 15. Не прибавив ни грамма веса, мы увеличили тягу на 20 процентов!

now you are just boasting without knowing, the Russians have improve Al-31 a great way beyond what China has

For that reason while J-11B might have higher thrust than J-11, the performance gains are not as high as Su-35 has over the original T-10S

Click here for link
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Engineer

Major
Look i know you did not read the links i have provided otherwise you will know what Victor Mihailovich Chenkin thinks about WS-10.

To start i do not think you even know who is Victor Mihailovich Chepkin

В.М. Чепкин родился в 1933 году.
После окончания в 1957 году Московского авиационного института был направлен в Пермское моторостроительное КБ, где прошел путь от инженера-конструктора до главного конструктора. Под руководством П. Соловьева, он был главным конструктором выдающегося по своим параметрам двигателя "Д-30Ф6" для самого быстрого в мире истребителя-перехватчика "МиГ-31", способного летать со скоростью более 3000 км/ч.

В 1983 году Виктор Михайлович был назначен заместителем министра авиационной промышленности СССР по вопросам двигателестроения.

С августа 1984 года — генеральный конструктор — генеральный директор НПО "Сатурн" им. А. М. Люльки. Под его руководством успешно завершены конструкторско-доводочные работы и проведены государственные испытания турбореактивного двигателя "АЛ-31Ф". Виктор Михайлович возглавил работы по созданию турбореактивного двигателя пятого поколения "АЛ 41Ф" и модернизации "АЛ-31Ф".

this says he was born in 1933 worked for Perm engines on jet engine designs, later on the MiG-31`s engine D30F6, for Solovyov, worked as Chief designer in Saturn on the Al-41F.


So he is really a jet aircraft designer to give you an idea D-30F6 has a thrust yield of 15 tonnes, but he worked on other jet engines.
Китайский самолет — это точная копия нашего?

— Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф", автоматика вся наша. Покупать лицензию на производство двигателя они не стали, лишь купили лицензию на ремонт двигателя (естественно со всеми чертежами). А поскольку ремонт и производство, по сути, очень близки, китайцы все тщательно изучили и самостоятельно освоили производство. В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию, у меня лично никаких сомнений не было. Поэтому выход у нас один — сделать лучше. И мы сделали двигатель "117С". Пусть теперь они за нами погоняются!



He does praise the Chinese engineers skills

in fact he says " В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию"

In China they have very competent engineers and they will master the production of jet engines

Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф

he says yes WS-10 is not an exact copy of the Al-31 but the Chinese used Al-31 in the development of WS-10, in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31
Victor Mihailovich Chenkin is not an authoritative on Chinese engines. He did not design the WS-10A and his claim of 70% AL-31F heritage has no basis in reality. It is common knowledge that
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which uses the core from American's F-110 engine.
The core of the CFM-56 turbofan that powered early Boeing-737 transports sold to China in the 1980s influenced early engine core designs for the Taihang.
This is echoed by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:
Actually, some resources from China showed that the development of WS-10 just bases on the core engine from CFM-56. And WS-10′s final object, is F110 engine.

There are also substantial difference in design between AL-31F and WS-10A. AL-31F has 4 fan and 9 compressor stages, 1 high pressure and 1 low pressure turbine. F-110 and WS-10A both have 3 fan and 9 compressor stages, 1 high pressure and 2 low pressure turbines. Clearly, WS-10A is not 70% similar to AL-31F.

What this demonstrates is that Russian source has no credibility when talking about Chinese military technologies.

This says the 117 engines increased the thrust of Al-31 20% without gaining weight
Накопленный таким образом за десять лет уникальнейший опыт мы опрокинули на модернизацию "АЛ-31Ф". В итоге родился двигатель "117". Даже простое приложение имеющихся наработок дало удивительный результат — тяга двигателя возросла с 12,5 тонн до 15. Не прибавив ни грамма веса, мы увеличили тягу на 20 процентов!
Russia can claim anything. These claims have never been verified by a third party source.


now you are just boasting without knowing, the Russians have improve Al-31 a great way beyond what China has

For that reason while J-11B might have higher thrust than J-11, the performance gains are not as high as Su-35 has over the original T-10S

Click here for link
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This shows you know nothing.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
In mid-2010 a Chinese television program revealed that the “5791 Plant” under the air force had succeeded in increasing the life span for AL-31 engines from 900 to 1,500 hours, a factor of 1.6.

Furthermore, it does not matter how the Russian are improving the AL-31F, as China is no longer using Russian engine on its new built fighters. China is not going to buy the Su-35 or 117S engine, and excuses are not going to alter such fact.
 

kroko

Senior Member
in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31

how can this guy know that ? unless he got acess to the chinese aircraft engine projects. I very much doubt that china would allow any foreigner acess to that information.


China is no longer using Russian engine on its new built fighters.

There were talk that the first batch of J-10B would use AL-31. And we dont know for sure what is J-20´s engine.
 

Engineer

Major
There were talk that the first batch of J-10B would use AL-31. And we dont know for sure what is J-20´s engine.

The potential of using AL-31FN would only be limited to the first batch, similar to the case with J-11B. There is no question that J-10B will eventually use WS-10A.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top