China also tried to put engines of their own on a second test J-20 vehicle, but the copycat of the Soviet engine AL-31F made by China is not in the same league as the Russian analogue for reliability and durability.
The real problem is both AL-31F and Chinese version are engines of the previous generation
here is the proof
something even echoed by the americans
Look understand this, i am not interfax, RT news, Sukhoi, RuAF or what ever ego you associate me.
RT news only said
China requested the engine 117S when the Russian defence minister visited China in 2010.
Russia rejected the chinese proposal and instead offered the 117S only if they buy the whole Su-35 in large numbers and China signed an agreement protecting the intellectual property rights of the whole deal.
later reports said the negociations stalled.
If China is only willing to buy 4 engines, it shows all China has no desire to equip such engine to its aircraft. None whatsoever. So, your claim that China wanting to buy the engines for J-11B is contradicted by your very own statement. In fact, whether the engines are AL-31F or the more advanced 117S, there is no needs for China to acquire any, since J-11B is already being equipped with WS-10A engines.Since the 117S most likely cost 10% of what the Su-35 costs, buying 50 Su-35 must be in the range 5 billion dollars.
For Russia a chinese proposal of buying 4-10 engines is not worthed even perhaps a buy of 100 engines for J-11Bs.
Sukhoi is unwilling to help a potential competitor and Pogyosan called to stop the sales of russian engines to China for even the FC-17 and Anatoli Isaykin from Rosoboronexport called to investigate the J-11B and in 2010 at Shuhai, Alexander Miheev also from Rosoboronexport was in talks with the Chinese side to investigate Chinese production of weapons that Russia considered were copycats without license
.
So is very likely Russia is unwilling to aid China unless a large amount of cash is paid by China.
It doesn't matter whether Russia is willing to sale. The issue is China is not willing to buy.Will Russia sell Su-35 to China only time will tell.
If Russia is so ahead of China in aerospace technologies, Russia wouldn't be so wary about Chinese copying Russian products. In any case, licensing issue is only an excuse to rationalize why no Su-35 is being exported, so as to avoid admitting the reality that China has little interest in the aircraft.Perhaps later Russia will sell Al-31M1s or Al-31M2s, but it seems after the J-11 license problems with China, Russia is much more wary of China and since Russia today is in a better economic situation, yes for the Russian side it might not be worthed the sale Su-35s if they do not cash a lot of money
Wrong. And, regarding the videos above, is all Russian news sources so inaccurate in their reporting?
Haven't you heard the news about the Chinese rebuilding the flanker engine including changing the fan blades to make them more reliable? This news came out direct from the mouth of Chinese officials and western observers quite some time back.
Victor Mihailovich Chenkin is not an authoritative on Chinese engines. He did not design the WS-10A and his claim of 70% AL-31F heritage has no basis in reality. It is common knowledge that , which uses the core from American's F-110 engine.Look i know you did not read the links i have provided otherwise you will know what Victor Mihailovich Chenkin thinks about WS-10.
To start i do not think you even know who is Victor Mihailovich Chepkin
В.М. Чепкин родился в 1933 году.
После окончания в 1957 году Московского авиационного института был направлен в Пермское моторостроительное КБ, где прошел путь от инженера-конструктора до главного конструктора. Под руководством П. Соловьева, он был главным конструктором выдающегося по своим параметрам двигателя "Д-30Ф6" для самого быстрого в мире истребителя-перехватчика "МиГ-31", способного летать со скоростью более 3000 км/ч.
В 1983 году Виктор Михайлович был назначен заместителем министра авиационной промышленности СССР по вопросам двигателестроения.
С августа 1984 года — генеральный конструктор — генеральный директор НПО "Сатурн" им. А. М. Люльки. Под его руководством успешно завершены конструкторско-доводочные работы и проведены государственные испытания турбореактивного двигателя "АЛ-31Ф". Виктор Михайлович возглавил работы по созданию турбореактивного двигателя пятого поколения "АЛ 41Ф" и модернизации "АЛ-31Ф".
this says he was born in 1933 worked for Perm engines on jet engine designs, later on the MiG-31`s engine D30F6, for Solovyov, worked as Chief designer in Saturn on the Al-41F.
So he is really a jet aircraft designer to give you an idea D-30F6 has a thrust yield of 15 tonnes, but he worked on other jet engines.
Китайский самолет — это точная копия нашего?
— Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф", автоматика вся наша. Покупать лицензию на производство двигателя они не стали, лишь купили лицензию на ремонт двигателя (естественно со всеми чертежами). А поскольку ремонт и производство, по сути, очень близки, китайцы все тщательно изучили и самостоятельно освоили производство. В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию, у меня лично никаких сомнений не было. Поэтому выход у нас один — сделать лучше. И мы сделали двигатель "117С". Пусть теперь они за нами погоняются!
He does praise the Chinese engineers skills
in fact he says " В Китае очень грамотные инженеры, и то, что они освоят эту продукцию"
In China they have very competent engineers and they will master the production of jet engines
Что касается двигателя, это не точная копия. Я его видел. Китайцы использовали и свои разработки, но на 70 процентов это наш "АЛ-31Ф
he says yes WS-10 is not an exact copy of the Al-31 but the Chinese used Al-31 in the development of WS-10, in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31
This is echoed by :The core of the CFM-56 turbofan that powered early Boeing-737 transports sold to China in the 1980s influenced early engine core designs for the Taihang.
Actually, some resources from China showed that the development of WS-10 just bases on the core engine from CFM-56. And WS-10′s final object, is F110 engine.
Russia can claim anything. These claims have never been verified by a third party source.This says the 117 engines increased the thrust of Al-31 20% without gaining weight
Накопленный таким образом за десять лет уникальнейший опыт мы опрокинули на модернизацию "АЛ-31Ф". В итоге родился двигатель "117". Даже простое приложение имеющихся наработок дало удивительный результат — тяга двигателя возросла с 12,5 тонн до 15. Не прибавив ни грамма веса, мы увеличили тягу на 20 процентов!
This shows you know nothing. .now you are just boasting without knowing, the Russians have improve Al-31 a great way beyond what China has
For that reason while J-11B might have higher thrust than J-11, the performance gains are not as high as Su-35 has over the original T-10S
Click here for link
In mid-2010 a Chinese television program revealed that the “5791 Plant” under the air force had succeeded in increasing the life span for AL-31 engines from 900 to 1,500 hours, a factor of 1.6.
in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31
China is no longer using Russian engine on its new built fighters.
There were talk that the first batch of J-10B would use AL-31. And we dont know for sure what is J-20´s engine.
in fact WS-10 is 70% our Al-31