Chengdu next gen combat aircraft (?J-36) thread

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
I think the first three years of service may not have the VCE to go with it. Considerations still must be made for usage of WS-10 and WS-15.
J-36 will enter in service in 2031-2032.. by that time we will have advance variants of WS-15 in production.

so either WS-15 or WS-XX

WS-XX has entered in full scale prototype stage. it won't take much time.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
J-36 will enter in service in 2031-2032.. by that time we will have advance variants of WS-15 in production.

so either WS-15 or WS-XX

WS-XX has entered in full scale prototype stage. it won't take much time.
Let's not be so affirmative with these timelines.

This depends on multiple factors. Is it area ruled as aggressively as the J-20? Is the reduction in drag going to be utilized to increase the range, speed, IR reduction or is it going to be traveling fast enough to consume more fuel than its predecessors?
Well that depends on the mission. if it's cruising at mach2.0, then it's going to have shorter range. But if it's looking to fight over Guam, then cruising optimally at high subsonic maybe the way to do.

The amount of fuel it will carry will ultimately depend on how many sensors and armaments they want to pack into this beast, but I agree with you on the fuel part. Those big wings do look very thirsty. Give it more time and we will have more info to play around with on the thread.
It is so much larger than J-20. The wings look to be 2.5 to 3x as large. You can put sensors on the leading edge and there to still hold just enormous amount of fuel in the wings.

The entire "big shrimp" community says this thing has Guam combat radius. It's clearly built to have lower drag than a non-flywing design of comparable size. Its fuel tank is probably at least 2x that of J-20. I don't know why it's so hard to just accept that it has 3000 km combat radius.
 

iBBz

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't know why it's so hard to just accept that it has 3000 km combat radius.
Because it isn't just about volume. It is also about mass, and that third engine will consume more fuel, therefore, I will wait for more solid info than guesswork.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General


Yes generational numbers mean nothing except when it’s the US that seems ahead of everyone else.

Some other observations noted in these videos…

They’re just RC models tricking everyone…

The J-36 is just a new J-20 variant like what the US did with the F-16XL…

Proof that the J-36 is just another J-20 is because the weapons bays are similar…

Entering the third stage of grief… bargaining.
 

00CuriousObserver

New Member
Registered Member
How I expect the J-XXX will be used, part 1. Yes, I am aware that the PLAAF will also have CCAs. Not included because the star of the show is the J-XXX and because I don't know what it looks like and how it fits the PLAAF's current doctrine. #stopamericanscopingJ-XXXisabombernotatruesixgen
View attachment 142002

Quite a few are taking issue (partially due to their own misinterpretation) with the depicted "J-36 1:8 against blue fighters/CCAs" (yes I know it's annotated and also missing context of red CCA)

I think it should be expected for infographics like these to be more widespread than intended

Also related, the discourse around these couple planes has been a sight to witness. Lots of cringe from both sides.
 

talonn

New Member
Registered Member


Yes generational numbers mean nothing except when it’s the US that seems ahead of everyone else.

Some other observations noted in these videos…

They’re just RC models tricking everyone…

The J-36 is just a new J-20 variant like what the US did with the F-16XL…

Proof that the J-36 is just another J-20 is because the weapons bays are similar…

Entering the third stage of grief… bargaining.
The guy at the bottom is huffing too much copium
 

Mearex

Just Hatched
Registered Member


Yes generational numbers mean nothing except when it’s the US that seems ahead of everyone else.

Some other observations noted in these videos…

They’re just RC models tricking everyone…

The J-36 is just a new J-20 variant like what the US did with the F-16XL…

Proof that the J-36 is just another J-20 is because the weapons bays are similar…

Entering the third stage of grief… bargaining.
comment starterpack for these videos:

It's the Mig25 moment for America
NGAD flew in 2020
Their 6th gen is our 4th gen
Needing 3 engines means their engine tech is trash
It looks similar to the RQ170/B2/<insert american aircraft name> which was made 20 years ago so they are still 20 years behind
I don't know what its capabilities are but all I know is that the F22 is better
can't fly fast without losing stealth coatings because china's material tech is trash
6th gen knockoff from wish/temu/aliexpress
the path from the intake to the engine (in CHAD) is straight so it can't hide the engine fans making it less stealthy from the front (ok this one is actually pretty legit and a big concern of mine as well)
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
the path from the intake to the engine (in CHAD) is straight so it can't hide the engine fans making it less stealthy from the front (ok this one is actually pretty legit and a big concern of mine as well)

It isn't particularly straight; if you consider where the weapons bay are, where the landing gear bays are, and the location of the engines in the fuselage, there basically has to be serpentine ducting to allow a passage from the intakes to the engines themselves.

The "straight line" from the air intake to the engines is about as "straight" as it appears say, on F-22.
 

polati

Junior Member
Registered Member
comment starterpack for these videos:

It's the Mig25 moment for America
NGAD flew in 2020
Their 6th gen is our 4th gen
Needing 3 engines means their engine tech is trash
It looks similar to the RQ170/B2/<insert american aircraft name> which was made 20 years ago so they are still 20 years behind
I don't know what its capabilities are but all I know is that the F22 is better
can't fly fast without losing stealth coatings because china's material tech is trash
6th gen knockoff from wish/temu/aliexpress
the path from the intake to the engine (in CHAD) is straight so it can't hide the engine fans making it less stealthy from the front (ok this one is actually pretty legit and a big concern of mine as well)
It probably both curves around the side bay and upwards (The side view of J-36 shows that the intake curves that way). I doubt they would not address such a massive detriment to stealth.
 
Top