Do have hearing problem or what?. 4 different peoples have come out and said it has been tested overland and they have high confidence that it will work. Navy intel chief Jack Dorsett, Admiral Mullen, Gen Gen Bingde,Taiwan Intel chief Tsai Der Sheng
If the DF-21D is decided to be used it will be against a MOVING TARGET OPERATING AT SEA. So far this missile has not been tested even to the point of firing at a stationary target at sea.
Shoot it at a deserted island or sandbar and end the speculation. A demonstration like that would go along way to making the world believe that DF-21D is a viable weapon system. The fact that nothing like this has happened causes doubts to surface about the effectiveness of this miracle weapon
As far as testing on a target on land that simulates a carrier, then why haven't the Chinese created a wooden mockup of the carrier, mounted that on railway tracks and hit it with this DF-21D while the target was moving?
They haven't because they cannot. DF-21D is a bluff.
Remember the Chinese are attempting to do something that noone has ever tried. And there is a reason for that
These pictures you posted mean nothing. Using PS anyone can try and convince the world that they have 'tested' the DF-21D on a carrier sized target but you know in your heart that it is just hype.
Oh and the words of these Navy people can easily be explained as fear mongering designed to pump up a threat needed when asking for a larger budget for when the military goes before Congress.
---------- Post added at 12:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 PM ----------
The re-entry vehicle might be water cooled. This was developed at Technical University Delft some 15 years ago.
Water is heavy. Every pound of water carried to cool the warhead is a pound less of explosive needed to engage the target. Think!
---------- Post added at 12:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 PM ----------
I thought you said there would be cloud cover protecting carriers. Now you say it's not just so you can say Chinese satellites will be shot down? Love your contradictions. Satellites for China are only a factor. China isn't as dependent on satellites as you are. Also you forget Chinese subs will get within torpedo range because that has happened before and not on paper. And also launch anti-ship missiles too. Remember like the obsolete Seersucker that hit Kuwait City without anyone ever detecting it in the middle of a war.
Your lack of knowledge caused you to misinterpret what was being said. To clarify what is being stated just look at this picture of the Varyag sailing in the Yellow Sea and imagine the cloud cover being just a bit heavier. The DF-21D would have a tough time finding this ship while traveling at Mach 10. And they were not even attempting to hide
Regarding Chinese submarines the CVN is escorted by at least one or two very quiet Los Angeles class or Virginia class subs which would be sure to take care of any Chinese subs attempting to get too close to the CVN.
Try again
Uploaded with
---------- Post added at 12:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 PM ----------
Which is 3000 km from the Chinese launch site. meaning with the F35 with a combat radius of 1100 km.... will mean the carrier is combat ineffective -> mission killed.
What was meant was this. The ability of the F-35 to DETECT the launch of a DF-21D as soon as it cleared the horizon.
So some how the smoke is tailored to Chinese frequencies and not american ones? Won't the Chinese radar just operate on American frequencies then to bypass the smoke? more fantasy than science; if you can see through the smoke, I bet someone else could too.
The smoke has particles suspended that act like chaff. And like chaff it is tailored for certain frequencies of radars that would be used to home in on the CVN. I have posted this article several times. I wish somebody would read it since it answers all the questions you and others are raising about the modern use of smoke or as it is known today: OBSCURANTS. Please note the bold parts of the quote. There are only so many ways to home in on a target. And like the Pershing 2 where the Chinese came up with the idea for a DF-21D, the homing radar is in the millimeter portion of the spectrum band
"....The application of obscurants on the modern battlefield has been widely examined by U.S. Army strategists and operators for over a decade and a half; (2) obscurants are firmly imbedded in U.S. Army doctrine. (3) Moreover, the effectiveness of obscurants against a panoply of terminal homing systems, from the visual to the millimeter-wave spectrum, is proven.
In simple terms, the particles suspended in the medium of smoke can be adjusted in size to absorb and diffuse radar waves emanating from the seeker heads of incoming antiship missiles, thereby denying any homing information to the missile. In the modern naval battle space, where antiship cruise missiles (ASCMs) are a principal threat, adapting obscurant systems and developing tactics and operational schemes for their use at sea is prudent. Given the stark potential of antiship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), this adaptation may be essential. (4)
Now do some math before concluding, when the DF21 is red hot, it will be what? 20 km up? 20 km is only 5 seconds of flight time. try to detect, locate, launch countermeasures and intercept at a safe distance in 5 seconds.
Nike-X which became
SPRINT accomplished these types of warhead intercepts decades ago. Check out SPRINT. It had 21 successful intercepts of incoming warhead. A remarkable piece of technology that has not been equaled even today