09III/09IV (093/094) Nuclear Submarine Thread

pkj

New Member
Registered Member
They have been testing these new toys, that is why they could randomly be spotted more easily.

Yeah, not expecting PLAN to do anything different. I'm really just lamenting the state of Info being spewed by the Western Defense Media, especially if you are not aware of better info from sites such as this forum.

With PLAN not stooping to directly addressing these nuke-sub-sunk-in-the-shallow-river rumors/lies, the swings in these medias, that either portray PLAN as comically inept or as a menacing peer to USN, continue.
 

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yeah, not expecting PLAN to do anything different. I'm really just lamenting the state of Info being spewed by the Western Defense Media, especially if you are not aware of better info from sites such as this forum.

With PLAN not stooping to directly addressing these nuke-sub-sunk-in-the-shallow-river rumors/lies, the swings in these medias, that either portray PLAN as comically inept or as a menacing peer to USN, continue.

The western reports was about a "Type 41" nuke sub that sunk in an inland base known mainly for building Type 039 SSK. There is no "Type 41" in the official record and no one had ever followed that model even in the OSINT community.

The Type 09III variants are well known SSNs built at the traditional location at Bohai and followed for years.
 
Top