Difficult ! really you see a VLS ? in this case 093B and normaly not homeported thereyeah,we can see little hump after the sail probably
Difficult ! really you see a VLS ? in this case 093B and normaly not homeported thereyeah,we can see little hump after the sail probably
Not VLC,I can only recognize the hump from this picture,and I don't think this hump contained VLC
View attachment 42656
Perhaps a towed communication buoy and windlass or something , just like Russian Oscar's hump.This hump = VLS sounds fishy to me.
I don’t understand why VLS on an attack submarine requires a hump on the hull unless the Chinese plan to fire some very large cruise missiles whose length are comparable to the diameter of the submarine’s pressure hull?
Also, why place VLS along the centerline behind the conning tower, where they must penetrate the pressure hull? Why not push them ahead of the front end of the pressure hull like on US LA class subs?
My suspicion is this hump does not house any VLS, but some equipment that is outside of the pressure hull, perhaps an underwater access hatch for combat swimmers, perhaps unmanned submersibles.
Coz YJ-18 or CM CJ-10 but not sure thi one exist is very long minimum 8.2 and 7.2 m exact ? but certain very long and is related to the shape of the hull i have see up to 18 missiles LOL for me 093B have 3 or 4 row a Los Angeles with about same size have 12 missiles less big the Tomahawk do 6.2 m.This hump = VLS sounds fishy to me.
I don’t understand why VLS on an attack submarine requires a hump on the hull unless the Chinese plan to fire some very large cruise missiles whose length are comparable to the diameter of the submarine’s pressure hull?
Also, why place VLS along the centerline behind the conning tower, where they must penetrate the pressure hull? Why not push them ahead of the front end of the pressure hull like on US LA class subs?
My suspicion is this hump does not house any VLS, but some equipment that is outside of the pressure hull, perhaps an underwater access hatch for combat swimmers, perhaps unmanned submersibles.
The presence of the hump is due to an oversized reactor, and has nothing to do with VLS.This hump = VLS sounds fishy to me.
I don’t understand why VLS on an attack submarine requires a hump on the hull unless the Chinese plan to fire some very large cruise missiles whose length are comparable to the diameter of the submarine’s pressure hull?
Also, why place VLS along the centerline behind the conning tower, where they must penetrate the pressure hull? Why not push them ahead of the front end of the pressure hull like on US LA class subs?
My suspicion is this hump does not house any VLS, but some equipment that is outside of the pressure hull, perhaps an underwater access hatch for combat swimmers, perhaps unmanned submersibles.
I agree the hump ≠ VLS but the reactor can't be in this position just after the sailThe presence of the hump is due to an oversized reactor, and has nothing to do with VLS.