re: PLAN Type 071 LPD & its Landing Craft
Not reinforce. Attack. The PLA general staff, like all general staffs, probably has numerous contingency plans and attacking the DPRK would be one of them.
---------- Post added 06-05-2012 at 12:10 AM ---------- Previous post was 06-04-2012 at 11:57 PM ----------
.. what about Sun Tzu and Clausewitz? Have you even read Clausewitz? Which part of his works talks about sending an assault force over vast distances?
Anyway, this is a total non-sequitur. What I said was I do not foresee the eventuality of a 2000-men-per-wave landing and if you can, you'd be welcome to come up with a plausible scenario rather than vague hand-waving and appeal to authority.
The fact that a capability may be useful even without its active employment (BIG SURPRISE, anyone who has lived through the Cold War is aware of it) is a strawman, unless you want to quote me the paragraph where I say China shouldn't bother with that capability.
IMO it's probably much easier and safer to send PLA troops across the Yalu River than reinforcing the DPRK by sea, IF that ever (and I hope not) happens.
Not reinforce. Attack. The PLA general staff, like all general staffs, probably has numerous contingency plans and attacking the DPRK would be one of them.
---------- Post added 06-05-2012 at 12:10 AM ---------- Previous post was 06-04-2012 at 11:57 PM ----------
Don't forget Sun tzu and Clausewitz, having the capability to deploy a assault force like these over vast oceans would serve Chinese overseas interest in the future. After all, all wars aims to achieve a political goal. If have these ship allows China to do gun boat diplomacy, then it's a good asset to have. With China no longer isolated to Asia, who know what crisis China may themselves in. Though, it does goes against stated policy; having capability and don't use it is difference can't do anything about the situation.
.. what about Sun Tzu and Clausewitz? Have you even read Clausewitz? Which part of his works talks about sending an assault force over vast distances?
Anyway, this is a total non-sequitur. What I said was I do not foresee the eventuality of a 2000-men-per-wave landing and if you can, you'd be welcome to come up with a plausible scenario rather than vague hand-waving and appeal to authority.
The fact that a capability may be useful even without its active employment (BIG SURPRISE, anyone who has lived through the Cold War is aware of it) is a strawman, unless you want to quote me the paragraph where I say China shouldn't bother with that capability.