Using google earth, I measured the width of the foundations to be 23m... almost on the dot.
The photo on the ground shows the superstructure's breadth to reach right over the concrete foundation, so assuming the edge of the foundation from the satellite photo is indicative of the concrete width, then we might be able to claim the width of the superstructure (and thus, the beam of the ship) will be 23m.
Yep, that's a reference to the 055 masterpost from a week or so ago.
Whatever the case, in a few months we will probably get clear pictures of this competed facility, likely revealing a large, stealthy superstructure with some form of integrated mast, and that'll probably catch the eye of mainstream western defence news sites.
And not long after, I expect a flurry of analysis and speculation about what the facility is meant to be, before eventually settling that this is a test facility for a rather large surface combatant.
The photo on the ground shows the superstructure's breadth to reach right over the concrete foundation, so assuming the edge of the foundation from the satellite photo is indicative of the concrete width, then we might be able to claim the width of the superstructure (and thus, the beam of the ship) will be 23m.
Yep, that's a reference to the 055 masterpost from a week or so ago.
Whatever the case, in a few months we will probably get clear pictures of this competed facility, likely revealing a large, stealthy superstructure with some form of integrated mast, and that'll probably catch the eye of mainstream western defence news sites.
And not long after, I expect a flurry of analysis and speculation about what the facility is meant to be, before eventually settling that this is a test facility for a rather large surface combatant.