joshuatree
Captain
That entirely depends on how advanced 055 is.
052D introduced a new VLS, an arguably new radar and a new main gun, probably among a host of other internal electronics and processing changes as well, yet the PLAN are confident enough to serially produce them off the bat.
Depending on how advanced 055 is (and no one expects a PLAN zumwalt), they could very well serially produce 055s.
The only major challenge I foresee would be propulsion, and that's only if the ship uses IEPS.
Yet the UK serially produced Type 45, and that was using a new propulsion system for the Royal Navy too.
You already have a new 052D being built, pushing the technological edge on the 055 program would make the most of this program if embarked. So it wouldn't just be IEPS. There's still the CCC you've talked about needing development, a more advanced sonar (which can serve the 054B program too if there is one), and more automation.
052D can be produced serially with confidence because the vessel itself has already been proven with 052C for a decade. Structural components such as hull and propulsion have not changed. With an 055, the basic premise is a much larger hull, needing a new propulsion system. Those are not tasks to take lightly even if the design is more conventional that Zumwalt. The other systems if not re-used from 052D can at least be developed using the test ships. But you need to eventually build and test hulls which is why it makes sense 055 initially be produced in limited numbers. By the time it reaches a state of mass production, there'll be enough tweaks for it to be 055A or 055B, whatever they want to call it since 054 went to 054A but 052 never went to 052A but 052B instead.
If you want to consider Zumwalt as being serially produced at three, what is your definition of serial production vs limited production? Cutoff at two? Personally, I consider serial production as something exceeding one round of order and more than three. 052C was limited production till the recent additional four more, which I would now consider a short serial production.
Yes, CGs inevitably offer greater endurance and range over DDGs, but their main advantage is additional firepower and command/control and having provision for an admiral to plant his flag. It is the latter aspects of capability the PLAN would be interested in.
I'm confused by this point of yours. I've never argued that there isn't a need for an eventual 055. I believe the main driving force for that is a need for an even better platform than the 052D on distant solo missions. Earlier, you stated CVBGs as the main driving need. But in a CVBG, the admiral would be planting his flag on the carrier.
Also, even if the PLAN is deploying a CVBG off the coast of africa, they technically don't need a cruiser -- that is to say, with refuelling and resupply, FFGs and DDGs can last as long as a CG.
Umm....that's been my point all along. That's why I asked if having an 055 in a CVBG is any better off than having a bunch of 052Ds in the CVBG.
There is also no need for the PLAN to send a 12,000 ton CG to Aden as part of a two ship flotilla. Such a taskforce would only be used to combat pirates, and you don't need such a ship to intercept and check out longboats. A pair of 054As can do the job just as good and more cost effectively.
I never was alluding to anti-piracy missions. I was referring to growing Chinese interests far and away in places like Africa. Chinese citizens there, business investments, etc etc.
Only difference is, the PLAN will actually seek to project power dramatically more as the 21st century progresses, but again, that doesn't entail a need for CGs as DDGs and even FFGs can last on deployments equally as long.
So I'm really confused, is your position that 055 is needed or not needed?