Miscellaneous News

ACuriousPLAFan

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
This is on the same level of idiocy as those Indians who said that India under Nehru 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China. As if it was ever India's to give. These people could never imagine that Russia and China earned their UNSC Veto power because of their immense sacrifice during WW2. Unlike the US, Britain, and France, who suffered much less in WW2. Unlike India, who was still a colony of the British during that era, and had not suffered anything close to what Russia and China went through.
Exactly.

In fact, China's return to the United Nations and the UNSC was voted by the UNGC members with a majority of 75 "aye" votes versus a minority of 35 "nay" votes for UNGA Resolution 2758.

When I see Indians on the internet being estatic and even having orgasm to the mention that China should lose her UNSC permanent seat, or the notion of India replacing China's seat on the UNSC is pure hilarious and ridiculous.

China - "Paid" for the victory in the Second World War AND one of the five permanent seats in the UNSC - With 25 MILLION CHINESE LIVES.

25 MILLION CHINESE PEOPLE'S BLOOD


Seriously, those ignorant f00ls from that subcontinent should just shut their own arses up.
 
Last edited:

GZDRefugee

Senior Member
Registered Member
This - versus - Indian OSINT tweeters bragging about the Indian troops allegedly "mauling" Chinese troops with bats lined with nails and laced with wires that is connected to a battery pack - Showcased and further proofed one important point: China likes to keep things silent and hidden; India likes to talk big and brags a lot.
Very cultural, I'm afraid. Anyone who's worked with Indians would notice the amount of ass kissing and exaggerated accolades they spout off incessantly. Meanwhile, Chinese just get shit done.

If you do ever work with Indians, make sure to have a paper trail of all your contributions so nobody can claim credit for your work.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Denmark drops (1 public) holiday (of 11) to beef up military spending​

Denmark’s newly-formed coalition government has opted to do away with one of the country’s 11 public holidays to help reach NATO’s annual defense spend target of 2% of GDP, despite criticism from religious Danes.

There is war in Europe, and we need to strengthen our defenses,” Prime Minister Mette Fredriksen explained on Thursday when asked why she was scrapping the holiday on the new government’s first day in power. “That will require everyone to contribute a little more.” She said she hoped the measure would boost productivity and economic activity.

Meeting NATO’s spending target three years ahead of schedule is one of the top priorities of the coalition government, which took power on Thursday. Comprised of the center-right Liberal Party and the centrist Moderates in addition to Fredriksen’s center-left Social Democrats, the coalition is Denmark's first in nearly half a century to include parties from both sides of the political

el-risitas-juan-joya-borja.gif
 

duncanidaho

Junior Member
This is on the same level of idiocy as those Indians who said that India under Nehru 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China. As if it was ever India's to give. These people could never imagine that Russia and China earned their UNSC Veto power because of their immense sacrifice during WW2. Unlike the US, Britain, and France, who suffered much less in WW2. Unlike India, who was still a colony of the British during that era, and had not suffered anything close to what Russia and China went through.

That is indian vedic logic! The UN-Charta was signed on June 26th 1945 and came into force an October 24th 1945, India became independent on August 15th 1947 with Nehru as its prime minister! So Nehru could 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China two years before the independence of India and before he came into power!
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The "international community" versus the rest of the world i.e. Global South, as usual.

The United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution for "Towards a New International Economic Order (NIEO)" with 123 in favour, 50 against and 1 absention.


Full text of the resolution:

Laid on the map - As usual, the exact same voting patterns.
20221216_021423.jpg

More details on NIEO:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Excerpt from Wikipedia page of NIEO:
The New International Economic Order (NIEO) is a set of proposals advocated by developing countries to end economic colonialism and dependency through a new interdependent economy.

Clearly shows the true faces of those neo-colonialists and neo-imperialists who still want to maintain their grip on their empires for as long as possible. If they lose that grip, their days of living luxuriously and lavishly off the backs of the poor and starving would be over.
 
Last edited:
Top