Quite a bit of consternation and speculation over a single set of photographs!
Could very wel be PS'ed or simply locally refurbished and upgraded original blackhawks from the original delivered batch.
I must agree however that if this were actually a new Chinese helicopter, both the PLA and the China government would have used it's apearance for propaganda together wit statements/proof of indigineous production.
So I'll just lie back and await further detailled info instead of making a fool of myself with wild guess-work.
I's like old British TV-Series .. come and see next week ...
Unlike the J-20 saga same time 2 years ago, the Z-20 was only known to have first flown at an airfield at north eastern China, without knowing exactly where it's impossible to have other party to travel there and provide eye-witness account; and as you'd know, the only source is from the Chinese BBS sites and those few weibo sites, and if you try to ask around, it's only a waste of time because they're totally buying into the hype and stuff.
And certainly, nobody can tell you what powerplant this thing flew with, and there has been nothing when concerning the status of WZ-16 turboshaft engines, because that's the only domestic engine that potentially provides the needed weight-power ratio to make the Z-20 practical, yet nothing about its design certification is available.
Like I've said before, we've all heard about the Z-20 for a long time, in fact the project went about as far back as when they first imported those S-70, but the technology required was way out of China's league back then; and the project has been in the limbo for the past 20+ years with almost nothing solid about it, and now it flew?
However, I don't think it's an overhauled airframe because those surviving S-70 airframes, the PLA put them though very heavy use over the last 30 years, mostly in the highlands region where they shines. As close as 2008, we see them using the S-70 in the disaster relief effort, that means the PLA are operating those airframes almost - if not exceeds - their structural lifespan limits, and you can't roll back stuff like that, even if that's doable it'd be uneconomical.