cn_habs
Junior Member
Here is the whole show
Pretty cool to see it in motion!
It's good to see that with some practice, the soldiers were able to land on their feet while sliding down the rope.
Here is the whole show
Pretty cool to see it in motion!
They changed the rear landing gear location to fit smaller landing pad it seems ? Could it help to turn them on deck ?A new image of the Z-20 naval transport and assault variant - sometimes called Z-20J (or even Z-20S) - was posted. This type is under development in parallel to the ASW variant Z-20F and two prototypes are known (serial numbers 6211 & 6212).
View attachment 65176
(Image via @zuola2006 from Weibo)
And similar to the Z-20J naval transport and assault variant posted a few minutes ago, here are also 4 new images showing the Z-20F ASW variant.
View attachment 65172View attachment 65173View attachment 65174View attachment 65175
(Images via @铁幕君SSS from Weibo)
Yup - picture a fully loaded Type 075, the tail wheel located closer to the cabin gives a tighter turning radius on the ground, and allows ground crew/tugs to maneuver Z-20s more easily on a packed flight deck or hangar.Could it help to turn them on deck ?
They changed the rear landing gear location to fit smaller landing pad it seems ? Could it help to turn them on deck ?
What are some of the disadvantages of having forward landing gear? Obviously there must be some, else all helicopters would have this configuration. I imagine it makes landings more difficult since a rear landing gear is more forgiving of sloppy helicopter orientation.Those modifications are present between UH-60 to the navalized SH-60 originally.
Other purposes of the rear landing gear location is that on the normal land based UH-60 and Z-20 the landing gear is on the tail, and if you want to fold the tail to reduce the length of the aircraft, you need to move the rear landing gear more forwards otherwise the rear landing gear will move with the folded tail (check the locations on UH-60 and Z-20 vs SH-60/MH-60 and Z-20F/J).
Also, having a more forward rear landing gear I think means the footprint of your landing pad can be smaller, because the points of the aircraft that need to touch the deck when it lands (i.e.: the landing gear) is shorter. It means your tail can overhang the aft part of the helipad if necessary when landing, but it wouldn't be possible if the rear landing gear was in the location of the land based UH-60 or Z-20.
What are some of the disadvantages of having forward landing gear? Obviously there must be some, else all helicopters would have this configuration. I imagine it makes landings more difficult since a rear landing gear is more forgiving of sloppy helicopter orientation.
A more rearward landing gear makes it easier to land on an unprepared surface (think along the lines of a grass field or sandy beach), since it comes into contact with the ground before the main wheels touchdown. Kinda hard to explain with words, so I'll illustrate with a video of a Black Hawk landing on a beach.... Try picturing that landing if the rear landing gear were closer to the body and not the tail.What are some of the disadvantages of having forward landing gear? Obviously there must be some, else all helicopters would have this configuration. I imagine it makes landings more difficult since a rear landing gear is more forgiving of sloppy helicopter orientation.