World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

cn_habs

Junior Member
Obozo's recent pro-Japanese announcement on Diaoyu has just further accelerated PLAN's development of 055, modified Yuan, LHDs and among many other things. :p
 

joshuatree

Captain
.....America has maintained a policy of deliberate strategic ambiguity and neutrality in Asia for decades for very good reasons, and by breaking with that policy, Obama has reduced the maneuvering space and strategic options for America, which is a great detriment to American interests. And worst of all, he did this for effectively no gain to himself or America.

Looking beyond merely the impact on America, this clarification is certain to embolden Japanese nationalists, who may now seek to actually provok China into a shooting war knowing it will be the Americans who will have to pay the blood price for their imperialistic ambitions. Obama might as well have handed them a blank cheque, and you will have to be incredible naive to think Japanese nationalists are not going to try and cash that. Expect the security situation in Asia to get worse, not better after this clarification.

.......

Obama has just demonstrated in no uncertain terms that America doesn't give a crap about Taiwan's wants and wishes, that Taiwan is just a pawn for them to use against China. Whose rights and interests can be bargained away at will by Washington with no notice let alone consulation or, god forbid, permission required from Taipei. All of this at a time of loud public defiance against the pro-China KMT party and not long before elections. .....

Yeah, Obama just took the US, China, and Japan up the creek without a paddle. The ambiguity was a strength for the US to be able to keep a strategic position in East Asia without ratcheting up tensions but he just threw that away. The ambiguity made both China and Japan think twice. Since ambiguity is thrown out, what exactly does "administration" of the islands mean? Either those islands are yours or not, how do you administer something that is not outright yours or how does the right to administer be given to you by someone else that doesn't own it? Definitely watch the Japanese nationalists be emboldened to build something on those islands. People think those islands are not gonna bring countries to war but it's a red line that China has to engage in if the Japanese start building on those islands. Otherwise, it's creditability within and abroad will be destroyed so a damaging war is still the better choice to make. And is all that risk worth it for the US? For what exactly? TPP? I'm not even sure every American citizen wants TPP because of the implications and impact. To this day, not everyone believes NAFTA is good. Was this for soothing an ally and making the "pivot" look like it has teeth? Then it certainly confirms the "pivot" is nothing peaceful and is absolutely containment.

Taking China out of the equation, Taiwan claims Diaoyu as well and the muted response is downright sad.
 

delft

Brigadier
From Marine Forum Daily Newa:
23 April

CHINA – JAPAN (#China)
A Chinese court has released Japanese iron ore carrier BAOSTEEL EMOTION, impounded at Shanghai over outstanding leasing payments dating back to 1937 (!), after owner paid and “fulfilled all its duties”.
That's fast!
 

Engineer

Major
Seems like the U.S. has finally made its position clear regarding Senkakus/Diaoyu Island in respect to US-Japan Defense treaty.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The article states that Senkakus/Diaoyu Island falls under article 5 of the mutual defense treaty.

With what's currently happening in Ukraine, looks like a storm is coming.

Obama effectively started a fire in Asia by giving out blank cheques. There is absolutely no doubt that Japan will feel bold to stir up trouble now. In my opinion, this is good news in disguise for China, bad news for Japan and those other Asian nations.

This is good for China, as Obama's statement removes any doubt in Chinese leaders' mind about America's role being an adversarial one. After today, those within the Chinese government who advocate for cooperation with America should fall silence, getting served tall glasses of I-told-you-so. Also, while one of Obama's intentions is to pressure China to concede, that very same pressure will quicken the pace of military modernization within China. As a result, we should see China pushes out newer and more hardware at a more rapid pace.

The reason this is bad news for nations such as Japan is as follow. Be it a small skirmish between China and Japan's navies, or China emptying half its missile inventory onto Japan, the consequence to China is the same -- America's intervention. With that being the case, it would be advantageous for China to do the latter and disarm Japan first, so that China may focus on one opponent at a time rather than getting ganged up. By then, America may not be able to stomach going one-on-one with China. The bonus is that China would be able to ensure her security for years to come by removing her biggest rival.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Obama effectively started a fire in Asia by giving out blank cheques. There is absolutely no doubt that Japan will feel bold to stir up trouble now. In my opinion, this is good news in disguise for China, bad news for Japan and those other Asian nations.

This is good for China, as Obama's statement removes any doubt in Chinese leaders' mind about America's role being an adversarial one. After today, those within the Chinese government who advocate for cooperation with America should fall silence, getting served tall glasses of I-told-you-so. Also, while one of Obama's intentions is to pressure China to concede, that very same pressure will quicken the pace of military modernization within China. As a result, we should see China pushes out newer and more hardware at a more rapid pace.

The reason this is bad news for nations such as Japan is as follow. Be it a small skirmish between China and Japan's navies, or China emptying half its missile inventory onto Japan, the consequence to China is the same -- America's intervention. With that being the case, it would be advantageous for China to do the latter and disarm Japan first, so that China may focus on one opponent at a time rather than getting ganged up. By then, America may not be able to stomach going one-on-one with China. The bonus is that China would be able to ensure her security for years to come by removing her biggest rival.


I agree that it is good for china because it says loud and clear where the US stands on the territorial dispute, and will likely galvanise China's leaders in taking a clearer look about its security environment.

But I disagree in the sense that China will see disarming Japan as a valid strategy first, rather I think it will mean China will tread a little more softly around Japan while simultaneously building up its military (and hopefully nuclear) arsenal even faster than it is now, so that they will reach a point of military parity or superiority in the region quicker.
 

no_name

Colonel
Seems like the U.S. has finally made its position clear regarding Senkakus/Diaoyu Island in respect to US-Japan Defense treaty.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The article states that Senkakus/Diaoyu Island falls under article 5 of the mutual defense treaty.

With what's currently happening in Ukraine, looks like a storm is coming.

Only thing made clear is Obama's intention for making the statement:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


He also said that the stance on the Diaoyu Island may be retracted if no breakthrough is achieved regarding the TPP talk. It sure does not cost anything to issue supportive statements.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Engineer

Major
But I disagree in the sense that China will see disarming Japan as a valid strategy first, rather I think it will mean China will tread a little more softly around Japan while simultaneously building up its military (and hopefully nuclear) arsenal even faster than it is now, so that they will reach a point of military parity or superiority in the region quicker.

I meant if shooting breaks out, then the viable strategy for China is to disarm Japan first before America's intervention. If no shooting occurs, then of course China should just continue doing what she is doing.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
A lot of articles I read speak of Obama "reaffirming" their alliance with the Japanese. If they're just repeating what they already know, that's for Japanese ears not Chinese. Meaning the Japanese are insecure and unsure. Also I read it being said "If Japan is attacked by China..." the US will come to Japan's defense. Why not the US will defend Japan no matter what... That's a stronger message to China. The Philippines finally apologized and are going to pay compensation for the slaughter of Hong Kong tourists. You don't think someone who is about to visit prodded them to resolve that after being so adamant. I'm sure that was a roadblock for any orchestrated anti-China plans with Hong Kong activists. If Obama is not aware now he should be that any one of these countries can drag the US into a war. Remember when Chen Shui-Bian went out of his way to taunt China because he knew the US was going to defend Taiwan? The US had to tell him to shut up and pipe-down. China was in a weaker position then. Look at the Taiwanese fisherman incident with the Philippines. That was resolved quicker than with Hong Kong. Two countries on the same team against China can make the whole idea that everyone-has-a-problem-with-only-China strategy fall apart.

This is no different a case where Obama is just a lot of show. I even read an article where it was mentioned, I don't know if this was a quote from the administration, that this is situation with China is not a "red-line" threat. Obama doesn't again want to be caught in a commitment that he didn't fulfill? The Japanese are going to be relegated to acting out their frustrations to more petty stunts that won't have cause for the US to rethink their relation.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top