MwRYum
Major
I did hear something about diplomatic immunity brings out the worst in humanity...but if there's something like that this time, those press bloodhounds should have sniffed it out by now.
World News Thread & Breaking News!!
- Thread starter kliu0
- Start date
- Status
I did hear something about diplomatic immunity brings out the worst in humanity...but if there's something like that this time, those press bloodhounds should have sniffed it out by now.
broadsword
Brigadier
You might have something there. She only underpaid the paid, not physically abused her.
kwaigonegin
Colonel
Actually her personal character IS relevant otherwise we wouldn't have even heard about this. This detainment of her is not a BIG deal. It happens thousands of times everyday across the US to American citizens nevermind a foreigner breaking the law. Noone single anyone out. If anything she purposely single herself out to cause commotion when none was needed nor necssary.
It only became a BIG deal because she exagerated her ordeal and blew things out of proportion. she made it sound like she was mistreated, humiliated, abuse and threw to a pack of dogs. Strip searches are routine procedures. TSA does that hundreds of time and those folks are not even criminal! nevermind the police etc...
But the way she implied it you would think a couple of 6' 4 federal marshalls threw her into a corner and proceeded to tear her clothes off! Nothing could be further from the truth.
No wonder the Indian government and the average Indian got upset!
What happened to her was NOTHING special nor extraordinary. She made it into one.
airsuperiority
Captain
I think it's both..although more of the US deliberately looking for something to scratch. Every country will have something they're not doing exactly politically correct, and it's just a matter if the other players decide to make an issue out of it. I think that's what the US did, except they didn't expect India to retaliate with such a strong response. For that matter, I think India did a very smart move. Such a strong move will teach Washington not to play this type of games anymore. It's very punishing for Washington; a small move with such a huge cost that Washington will remember and whimper as a major diplomatic slap in the face.
^ This, Equation, is what I'm talking about in terms of deterrence: Washington tried to bully New Delhi with such a move, but definitely miscalculated India's response to be such robust.They expected less, but what India is doing is hurting so much more, and makes Washington looks stupid internationally. This will definitely hurt and sting Washington a lot, and it's quite certain that next time Washington won't do something like this again. They've created a bigger mess than they anticipated. They didn't anticipate India can do so much; now even to the US citizens, they will remember that they also have assets in India, and their government had put Americans at risk in India. The response is like a huge bear slap for a small punch.
TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
sounds like the Osprey still was functional and landed under control. A testament to the hard work put into her design and build, as well as her crew.
shen
Senior Member
many in the Indian press think this is the real reason why the US wants to humiliate India.
for years, the US has been backing BNP, while India backs Awami League. Leading up the latest election, the US and India seems to be fighting an intense little proxy war there.
for years, the US has been backing BNP, while India backs Awami League. Leading up the latest election, the US and India seems to be fighting an intense little proxy war there.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Another who preaches about good governance to others but don't practice it with their own. Yeah they can get rid of foreign workers who put thoughts in people's heads but what rights are they going to violate to keep the status quo in power.
As Singapore gets richer, more people left behind
By Kevin Lim
December 23, 2013 12:08 AM
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Every day, through eyes clouded by glaucoma, Peter witnesses the spending power generated by Singapore's economic success, knowing he can only afford to look.
The 54-year-old shopping mall security guard is part of Singapore's hidden problem - a growing number of poor living on the margins in one of the world's most expensive cities.
The party that has run the city state since independence in 1965 has always preached the virtues of self-reliance, but for some the cost of looking after themselves has moved beyond their means.
Peter fears that he cannot afford to treat his glaucoma, a condition that could threaten his sight, despite being eligible for subsidized surgery and other state benefits.
He was told treatment would cost over S$4,000 ($3,200), but the ailment only qualifies him to take up to S$1,700 from his state-administered healthcare savings.
Peter, who wanted his surname to be withheld as he did not have his employer's permission to speak to media, earns around S$1,600 ($1,300) a month working in the glitzy Orchard Road area.
Half of his salary goes paying off S$20,000 of debts run up when his wife broke her ankle two years ago, and they are also still paying off their small flat in a public housing block.
"We have no savings," he mumbled, recounting how he had borrowed from 18 moneylenders after his wife's accident.
COMPULSORY SAVINGS
Singapore operates a system of compulsory savings, supplemented by employer contributions, for retirement and healthcare through its Central Provident Fund (CPF). Private insurance schemes are also available.
Yet, Mindshare, a global media and marketing services firm, found in a survey last year that 72 percent of Singaporeans felt they "cannot afford to get sick due to high medical costs".
Data for 2002 to 2011 shows the government paid for less than one third of all healthcare costs, whereas the average for developed countries in the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development was between 60-70 percent.
Mounting unease over the number of voters who feel excluded from the comforts of living in Singapore has persuaded the People's Action Party (PAP) to re-set its goals.
At a convention this month, the ruling party issued its first new resolution in 25 years, promising to improve living standards for all, create quality jobs, and provide affordable healthcare.
Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing said the government is ready to help citizens struggling to meet medical costs, but some were unaware of the support available.
"Very often, the people who are most in need may not read the newspapers, access the Internet or even understand English," he told parliament last month. "They need people who can talk to them in their language, people who will knock on their doors, check on them to see whether they are okay, and explain some of these assistance schemes to them."
MORE MILLIONAIRES, BIGGER GAP
The city-state has seen a huge rise in wealth over the past decade as it positioned itself as a luxury low-tax base for ultra-wealthy people from across the world.
Per-capita GDP of S$65,048 exceeds that of the United States and Germany. And surveys highlight how Singapore, with a population of 5.4 million people, has more millionaires per capita than any other country. The Economist Intelligence Unit ranks it as the world's sixth most expensive city.
But data published by the CPF shows the proportion of Singaporeans earning less than half the median income - an international yardstick for measuring the proportion of poor people -- rose to 26 percent in 2011 from 16 percent in 2002.
"As one of the world's richest nations, we can afford to do better," Caritas Singapore, the Catholic Church's social outreach arm, said at the launch of an advertising and social media campaign to highlight the plight of the poor.
About 12 percent of the 2 million Singaporeans at work earn less than S$1,000 a month. Whereas, Hui Weng Tat, an associate professor in economics at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, reckons a typical worker needs a minimum S$1,400-S$1,500 a month to cope with living costs.
The city-state's Gini co-efficient, a measure of income inequality, hit 0.478 in 2012, according to government figures, higher than every other advanced economy aside from Hong Kong.
Unlike Hong Kong, Singapore has not set an official poverty line, and the government has rejected calls to introduce a minimum wage.
What PAP has done is to make it harder for firms to recruit low-cost foreigners, tighten requirements to boost wages at the low-end, and amend labor laws to give more job security.
There are also plans to expand social protection and increase spending on healthcare. And while Singapore isn't going to raise income tax anytime soon, it has raised taxes on bigger cars and luxury homes.
"There's more to be done," Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said during a recent dialogue with diplomats and university students. "I'm not satisfied with the situation in the way it is."
($1 = 1.2587 Singapore dollars)
(Reporting by Kevin Lim; Additional reporting by Laura Philomin; Editing by Rachel Armstrong and Simon Cameron-Moore)
As Singapore gets richer, more people left behind
By Kevin Lim
December 23, 2013 12:08 AM
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Every day, through eyes clouded by glaucoma, Peter witnesses the spending power generated by Singapore's economic success, knowing he can only afford to look.
The 54-year-old shopping mall security guard is part of Singapore's hidden problem - a growing number of poor living on the margins in one of the world's most expensive cities.
The party that has run the city state since independence in 1965 has always preached the virtues of self-reliance, but for some the cost of looking after themselves has moved beyond their means.
Peter fears that he cannot afford to treat his glaucoma, a condition that could threaten his sight, despite being eligible for subsidized surgery and other state benefits.
He was told treatment would cost over S$4,000 ($3,200), but the ailment only qualifies him to take up to S$1,700 from his state-administered healthcare savings.
Peter, who wanted his surname to be withheld as he did not have his employer's permission to speak to media, earns around S$1,600 ($1,300) a month working in the glitzy Orchard Road area.
Half of his salary goes paying off S$20,000 of debts run up when his wife broke her ankle two years ago, and they are also still paying off their small flat in a public housing block.
"We have no savings," he mumbled, recounting how he had borrowed from 18 moneylenders after his wife's accident.
COMPULSORY SAVINGS
Singapore operates a system of compulsory savings, supplemented by employer contributions, for retirement and healthcare through its Central Provident Fund (CPF). Private insurance schemes are also available.
Yet, Mindshare, a global media and marketing services firm, found in a survey last year that 72 percent of Singaporeans felt they "cannot afford to get sick due to high medical costs".
Data for 2002 to 2011 shows the government paid for less than one third of all healthcare costs, whereas the average for developed countries in the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development was between 60-70 percent.
Mounting unease over the number of voters who feel excluded from the comforts of living in Singapore has persuaded the People's Action Party (PAP) to re-set its goals.
At a convention this month, the ruling party issued its first new resolution in 25 years, promising to improve living standards for all, create quality jobs, and provide affordable healthcare.
Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing said the government is ready to help citizens struggling to meet medical costs, but some were unaware of the support available.
"Very often, the people who are most in need may not read the newspapers, access the Internet or even understand English," he told parliament last month. "They need people who can talk to them in their language, people who will knock on their doors, check on them to see whether they are okay, and explain some of these assistance schemes to them."
MORE MILLIONAIRES, BIGGER GAP
The city-state has seen a huge rise in wealth over the past decade as it positioned itself as a luxury low-tax base for ultra-wealthy people from across the world.
Per-capita GDP of S$65,048 exceeds that of the United States and Germany. And surveys highlight how Singapore, with a population of 5.4 million people, has more millionaires per capita than any other country. The Economist Intelligence Unit ranks it as the world's sixth most expensive city.
But data published by the CPF shows the proportion of Singaporeans earning less than half the median income - an international yardstick for measuring the proportion of poor people -- rose to 26 percent in 2011 from 16 percent in 2002.
"As one of the world's richest nations, we can afford to do better," Caritas Singapore, the Catholic Church's social outreach arm, said at the launch of an advertising and social media campaign to highlight the plight of the poor.
About 12 percent of the 2 million Singaporeans at work earn less than S$1,000 a month. Whereas, Hui Weng Tat, an associate professor in economics at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, reckons a typical worker needs a minimum S$1,400-S$1,500 a month to cope with living costs.
The city-state's Gini co-efficient, a measure of income inequality, hit 0.478 in 2012, according to government figures, higher than every other advanced economy aside from Hong Kong.
Unlike Hong Kong, Singapore has not set an official poverty line, and the government has rejected calls to introduce a minimum wage.
What PAP has done is to make it harder for firms to recruit low-cost foreigners, tighten requirements to boost wages at the low-end, and amend labor laws to give more job security.
There are also plans to expand social protection and increase spending on healthcare. And while Singapore isn't going to raise income tax anytime soon, it has raised taxes on bigger cars and luxury homes.
"There's more to be done," Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said during a recent dialogue with diplomats and university students. "I'm not satisfied with the situation in the way it is."
($1 = 1.2587 Singapore dollars)
(Reporting by Kevin Lim; Additional reporting by Laura Philomin; Editing by Rachel Armstrong and Simon Cameron-Moore)
broadsword
Brigadier
That tells a lot.
- Status