World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
The bigger question is how did the Naxalites - a bunch of poorly educated tribals - get real-time, actionable intel on the movements of a senior opposition political figure (Congress is the minority in Chattisgarh state) supposedly under the protection of "class Z+" security (the highest protection level the Indian Home Ministry affords VIPs?)

Smells like an inside job to me. The ghost of Aldo Moro is calling from the grave...
IMHO, there is no doubt that they had inside info and help. They not only knew when and where, but they had the weapons to deal with the security.

And why were Karma and Patel not in his armored vehicle that had been specifically provided for them? Makes one wonder further about inside involvement. Did someone recommend, encourage, or advise them they did not need it?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
IMHO, there is no doubt that they had inside info and help. They not only knew when and where, but they had the weapons to deal with the security.

And why were Karma and Patel not in his armored vehicle that had been specifically provided for them? Makes one wonder further about inside involvement. Did someone recommend, encourage, or advise them they did not need it?

Unless we are talking about a full blown APC, an armoured car would not have made much difference in this scenario.

Bulletproof cars are not really immune to bullets, and if enough sustained fire is directed at them, even the most heavily modified armoured cars will turn into death traps. Armoured cars give their occupants time to get away from an ambush with its occupants intact, that is all.

If the convoy was trapped in a bottlenet with no way for the vehicles to get past the felled trees and destroyed/disabled vehicle blocking the rear, it would not have made much difference even if they had been in an armed car as all that would meant is the rebels would have taken a little longer and had to use more ammo or a demo charge to get at the people inside, but get to them they would have all the same.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
After intense lobbying by the UK and France and misgivings by almost everyone else, the EU scraps arms ban on Syria, effectively clearing the way for supplying weapons directly to anti-government forces.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Russia responds by announcing S300 deliveries to Syria.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


On balance, it looks like a net gain for Assad because the west is already covertly supplying, or at least facilitating arms transfers to their favourite rebels via the likes of the CIA through friendly Gulf States and Turkey. Making the transfers official changes the dynamic little on the ground, if anything, it might make arms transfers harder since the requirement that Ll arms supplied must only be used to protect civilians is an almost impossible to meet criteria.

OTOH, this has given Russia the perfect pretext and diplomatic cover to supply S300s to Syria with little risk of being accused as inflaming the conflict.

Pretty boneheaded move by the UK and France that only really makes sense when you consider all the lucrative arms deals their respective arms industries might get as a result, since the only real thing this decision changes is the Uk and France can supply he rebels with Made in the UK/France weapons instead of black market (mainly soviet and Russian) weapons as they did before.
 

Franklin

Captain
This Obama Xi summit in Calfornia was apparently made up on the fly so to speak by officials. It will take place 7-8 june.

US, China set the stage for Obama-Xi summit

An upcoming summit with President Barack Obama comes at a "critical juncture" in relations between China and the U.S., Chinese President Xi Jinping said Monday, underscoring the challenge they face in confronting divisive security issues and overcoming growing distrust.

Xi told U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon — who was in Beijing to prepare for the June 7-8 meeting — that he expected positive results from the talks, which will be their first face-to-face meeting since Obama's re-election and Xi's promotion to head of the Communist Party last November.

"The current China-U.S. relationship is at a critical juncture," Xi said. The sides must now "build on past successes and open up new dimensions for the future."

In a sign that both sides want to stem a drift in ties, the summit is taking place months earlier than the two presidents were supposed to meet. The setting — at the private Sunnylands estate of the late publishing tycoon Walter Annenberg in southern California — is supposed to be informal, giving Xi and Obama a chance to build a rapport.

Donilon flew to Beijing this week to prepare an agenda and straighten out other technical issues. He told Xi that Obama is "firmly committed to building a relationship defined by higher levels of practical cooperation and greater levels of trust, while managing whatever differences and disagreements might arise between us."

Meeting earlier with State Councilor Yang Jiechi, China's senior foreign policy official, Donilon said the summit is a chance for the two presidents to work through problems. Though they did not identify those challenges in their public remarks, ties are strained across the board, from longstanding differences over the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs to new disputes over cyberattacks and China's more assertive pursuit of territorial claims against U.S. allies Japan and the Philippines.

"The meeting will be an important opportunity for our presidents to have in-depth discussions about U.S.-China relations, and a wide range of global and regional challenges facing both our countries," Donilon said.

That Xi agreed to an informal summit has been seen by Chinese and U.S. experts as positive. His predecessors always preferred formal state visits, splashing images of White House ceremonies and banquets in the Chinese media to bolster their standing as world statesmen.

Good will aside, distrust has deepened in relations in recent years as the U.S. feels its world leadership challenged and China, its power growing, demands greater deference to its interests and a larger say over global rule setting. Chinese officials and state media regularly say Washington is thwarting China's rise, strengthening alliances in Asia to hem in Beijing and discouraging Chinese investment in the U.S. on grounds of national security.

The official Xinhua News Agency reported Monday that ships and submarines from the Chinese navy's three fleets staged drills in the South China Sea late last week. The area is already a flashpoint, with Beijing's aggressive claims to disputed islands having rattled the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei.

On Sunday, Li Keqiang — on a visit to Germany in his first trip abroad as China's premier — pressed China's claim to a cluster of East China Sea islands held by Japan. Traveling to Potsdam, where allied powers declared the terms for Japan's surrender 68 years ago in the waning days of World War II, Li told reporters that Japan must not "deny or glorify the history of fascist aggression."

The aggrieved sense emanating from Beijing goes beyond recent flare-ups in old territorial disputes. The website of the People's Daily, the Communist Party's flagship newspaper, is running a recurring column that takes a critical look at Americans and their institutions. First called "Immoral, dishonest Americans," the title of the column was changed to "The Americans you don't know about."

One item on Donilon's summit plans is the guest list. Xi will stop in California after formal visits to Trinidad and Tobago and Mexico where he will be accompanied by a large group of senior officials. If that entourage descends in full on the Sunnylands estate, U.S. diplomats said the White House might feel the need to bring similarly large numbers, making the summit less intimate.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Apparently very last minute. I read an article that this was at first an invitation by LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to come visit Los Angeles. Meeting Obama is actually secondary. It would be weird if a major leader in the world visits the US without meeting the President. They probably had to let Obama know.
 

solarz

Brigadier
After intense lobbying by the UK and France and misgivings by almost everyone else, the EU scraps arms ban on Syria, effectively clearing the way for supplying weapons directly to anti-government forces.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Russia responds by announcing S300 deliveries to Syria.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


On balance, it looks like a net gain for Assad because the west is already covertly supplying, or at least facilitating arms transfers to their favourite rebels via the likes of the CIA through friendly Gulf States and Turkey. Making the transfers official changes the dynamic little on the ground, if anything, it might make arms transfers harder since the requirement that Ll arms supplied must only be used to protect civilians is an almost impossible to meet criteria.

OTOH, this has given Russia the perfect pretext and diplomatic cover to supply S300s to Syria with little risk of being accused as inflaming the conflict.

Pretty boneheaded move by the UK and France that only really makes sense when you consider all the lucrative arms deals their respective arms industries might get as a result, since the only real thing this decision changes is the Uk and France can supply he rebels with Made in the UK/France weapons instead of black market (mainly soviet and Russian) weapons as they did before.

Only the most self-deluded politician can believe that any weapon sent to the Syrian opposition won't find its way into the hands of al-Qaeda and co.

Given that, how can we explain these repeated push to provide weapons to the Syrian rebels?

Isn't this a pretty clear evidence that these politicians are more interested in enriching their defense contractors than in ensuring the safety of their citizens and their soldiers?
 
Only the most self-deluded politician can believe that any weapon sent to the Syrian opposition won't find its way into the hands of al-Qaeda and co.

Given that, how can we explain these repeated push to provide weapons to the Syrian rebels?

Isn't this a pretty clear evidence that these politicians are more interested in enriching their defense contractors than in ensuring the safety of their citizens and their soldiers?

It's just like the US and W. Germany selling chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein's Iraq in the '80s, as long as it's the Iranians and company who get hurt the most! Collateral consequences have a lag time, are not certainties, and there are opportunities to mitigate them.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Either side wins Everyone looses. Assad will fall either way to. If he secures his boarders Hamas will push him out and impose a pro Iranian puppet. Those S300's will be "resold" and parked around The Iranian weapons plants. And Hamas would Use Syria to place pressure on the neighboring nations. If the Rebels win even the supposed pro Westerner ones or the Local groups who have no relation to AQ, The Rebel groups will fight among themselves as AQ and it's allies push to Take control of the country and use it as a launching point to destabilize the neighboring nations.

U.S. woman killed in Syria identified by relatives via online images
(CNN) -- An American woman was among three Westerners reported killed in Syria, her relatives said Friday.
Pictures circulating on the Internet show the body of Nicole Lynn Mansfield, 33, of Flint, Michigan, her father and daughter told CNN on Friday.
"I didn't even recognize her," said daughter Triana Jones about her first view of the pictures. "Then I had to look again. I looked at her body and her feet and her hands and her nose and her mouth, and I knew that it was her."
The dead woman's father, Gregory Mansfield, said he had received no official word of the death but added he, too, had seen the body in the pictures. "It's my daughter," he said. "I'm positive of that."
He said he had notified the FBI three years ago when his daughter converted to Islam, but he had not known what she was doing in Syria. "I want answers," he said.
American woman killed in Syria What's next in Syria? Syria's new ground zero
Jones, who just graduated from high school, said her mother had learned about a project to help Syrians by "talking to people online," but Mansfield told her she would not be involved in fighting.
During a conversation about a month ago, Jones said, her mother told her she planned to be home within a week, but during their next talk a week or two later she told her daughter that her ID had been stolen and she was not able to return.
"That's the last time I talked to her," said Jones, who added she planned to give her mother an Islamic burial. "She told me that's how she would have wanted it."
Syrian state-run television reported Thursday that forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad killed three Westerners and identified the woman, releasing what it said were images of her Michigan driver's license and U.S. passport. It also released what it said was the name and a picture of the passport of a British citizen. It did not identify a third person it identified as a Westerner.
The news outlet said the three had been fighting alongside the rebels and were found with weapons. The report said they were ambushed in their car in the flashpoint province of Idlib in northwestern Syria, where government forces have been battling rebels for control.
TV video showed a bullet-riddled car and three bodies laid out on the ground. It also showed weapons, a computer, a hand-drawn map of a government military facility and a flag belonging to the al Qaeda-affiliated al-Nusra Front.
Mansfield's grandmother, Carole Mansfield, said her granddaughter had converted to Islam three to five years ago when she was living in Flint. She said she had last seen Nicole Mansfield six to eight months ago, and her granddaughter had previously traveled abroad for religious purposes, including to Dubai within the past three years.
Carole Mansfield said she did not know how her granddaughter died or why she was in Syria.
She described her first grandchild as "a very giving person" who "had a heart of gold."
But she said she did not support her turn to Islam. "At that time, I told her that I thought she was looking a rattlesnake in the eyes."
"She liked their god," said Monica Steelman, Nicole Mansfield's aunt. She said her niece used to go to the neighborhood mosque several times a day.
The United States is aware of the report of the killing and is working through the Czech Republic mission in Syria to obtain more information, a State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told CNN.
Citing privacy concerns, the official said, "We are unable to comment further."
The UK Foreign Office confirmed that a British national was among the dead. "Their family has been informed and we are providing consular assistance," it said.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that some 1,500 to 2,000 American fighters may be in Syria. "It's hard to get a peg on the exact number," he said at a joint news conference in Washington with German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle.
The killing continued Friday in Syria, with the opposition Local Coordination Committees reporting 91 deaths by evening, including two women, three children and 50 prisoners who were executed by government forces in Aleppo's Central Prison.
On Thursday, al-Assad told Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV that the balance of power had shifted in his favor.
"The main reason for tipping the balance is the change in people's opinion in areas that used to incubate armed groups, not necessarily due to lack of patriotism on their part, but because they were deceived," he said, according to a transcript of the interview posted by the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency.
"They were led to believe that there was a revolution against the failings of the state. This has changed; many individuals have left these terrorist groups and have returned to their normal lives."
The Syrian president offered no evidence to support that assertion.
The arrival of Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon has had little impact on the overall conflict, he said. "The number of fighters Hezbollah might contribute in order to defend the Syrian state in its battle would be a drop in the ocean compared to the number of Syrian soldiers fighting the terrorists," he said, using the government's term for opposition fighters.
Asked whether Syria has received S-300 missiles from Russia, which supports the Damascus government, al-Assad was noncommittal.
"It is not our policy to talk publicly about military issues in terms of what we possess or what we receive," he said. "As far as Russia is concerned, the contracts have nothing to do with the crisis. We have negotiated with them on different kinds of weapons for years, and Russia is committed to honoring these contracts."
Russia has been criticized by the West for reported sales of six S-300 air defense systems to Syria under a 2010 contract.
Moscow, however, has said such deliveries would conform with international law and has denied supplying Syria with weapons that can be used against civilians.
Kerry described any transfer of S-300s to the region as "not helpful."
"Whether it's an old contract or not, it has a profoundly negative impact on the balance of interests and the stability of the region, and it does put Israel at risk," he said.
Plans for an international conference to be held in Geneva, Switzerland, remain unclear, but al-Assad predicted it will take place in June.
"We have announced a couple of days ago that we agree in principle to attend," he said.
But if conditions are imposed by any of the participants, Damascus could decide to withdraw, he said. "So the idea of the conference, of a meeting, in principle is a good one. We will have to wait and see."
The National Coalition, the main rebel umbrella group, has demanded that al-Assad step aside as a condition for its participation in the talks, which were originally scheduled to be held this month.
Al-Assad said he would require only one condition -- that anything agreed to during the meeting would not be binding until the Syrian people approved it through a popular referendum.
"Either side can propose anything, but nothing can be implemented without the approval of the Syrian people. And as long as we are the legitimate representatives of the people, we have nothing to fear," he said.
It is too early to discuss whether he will run again for president in the 2014 elections, the president said. "When the time comes, and I feel, through my meetings and interactions with the Syrian people, that there is a need and public desire for me to nominate myself, I will not hesitate. However, if I feel that the Syrian people do not want me to lead them, then naturally I will not put myself forward."
Al-Assad said he is confident his government will emerge victorious in its "global war waged against Syria and the resistance."
Al-Assad's remarks came the same day that a leader of the National Coalition said the rebel group may not participate in the Geneva conference.
"It is difficult to continue when Syrians are constantly being hammered by the Assad regime with the help of outside forces," said George Sabra, acting chairman of the National Coalition, in a statement.
He cited the siege of Qusayr and attacks on Eastern Gouta, a suburb of Damascus, as well as what he said was an "invasion" by Iranian militia members in support of al-Assad.
SANA reported Friday that government forces had regained control over four towns in Eastern Gouta.
Russia also has expressed reservations about the planned talks. Conditions on the peace talks demanded by the National Coalition are too restrictive, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters, state news agency ITAR-Tass reported.
"One has the impression that the National Coalition and its regional sponsors are doing their utmost in a bid to prevent the beginning of a political process and resort to all means, including brainwashing in the West, to induce military intervention," Lavrov is quoted as saying. "We regard such approaches as impermissible."
CNN's Stephanie Kotuby and Adam Reiss contributed to this report.

Let's move on to some thing a little lighter.

Congratulations to Mr.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Of Beijing and the Xinhua News Agency . He just Won the Hayek Prize For his book "Tombstone: An Account of Chinese Famine in the 1960s". The Hayek Prise is named for Fredrick Hayek a Austrian econimist And political thinker who basicly wrote the book on Conservitive thinking in the US and Britan.
Banned ‘Tombstone’ Author Receives Literary Prize in New York » The Epoch Times

Epoch Times
A former senior editor for the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda mouthpiece collected the Manhattan Institute’s Hayek Prize Wednesday night.

The book award is given by the libertarian-leaning think tank to acknowledge recent works that “best reflect Hayek’s vision of economic and individual liberty.” It comes with a $50,000 cash prize.

Chinese journalist and historian Yang Jisheng’s book, “Tombstone,” was published in English last year; it is a comprehensive account of the Great Chinese Famine from 1958 to 1962, during which his father starved to death among over 36 million other peasants.

At the time, Chairman Mao attributed the tragedy to “the three years of natural calamities,” but Yang, through his own experiences and 15 years of research while working for Xinhua, learned the truth*: to exponentially increase grain and steel production during the so-called Great Leap Forward, Mao expended the lives of countless rural workers.

As grain was sent to the cities and abroad, Chinese in the countryside were prevented from leaving to find food. Desperate, they tried to subsist on things like clay, elm bark, and bird droppings; some parents even ended up eating their own children.

“Mao’s powers expanded from the people’s minds to their stomachs,” Yang recently told the Wall Street Journal. “Whatever the Chinese people’s brains were thinking and what their stomachs were receiving were all under the control of Mao. . . . His powers extended to every inch of the field, and every factory, every workroom of a factory, every family in China.”

In his 1944 book “The Road to Serfdom,” Austrian economist and philosopher Friedrich Hayek had called this approach the “fatal conceit” of socialism, contrasting it with a free market, which allows producers to match prices to consumers’ preferences without coercion or waste of human and natural resources.

Hayek’s book was translated into Chinese in 1962, but could only be read by Party leaders wanting to study a critique of socialism. Years later, a censored version became available to the Chinese public, which greatly influenced Yang’s thinking on events that had unfolded since the Mao era.

Manhattan Institute founder Sir Anthony Fisher spoke with Hayek on how to reverse the erosion of freedom, who advised beginning “on the battlefield of ideas.”

In “Tombstone,” Yang said that the totalitarian regime was the root cause of the famine. In a more open system, people would have realized immediately, and leaders would have modified mistaken policies, he said.

During the event in New York, Yang explained the significance of the name he chose for the book. “There are four levels of meaning to the book title–first it’s the tombstone of my father, who died of starvation during that time; second it’s the tombstone of the 36 million Chinese, who died during those three years of starvation; third I hoped it would be a tombstone for the system that allowed so many people to die of starvation; and fourth, due to the danger I was in while writing, I thought it might be my own tombstone.”

Although he supports democracy and freedom of information, Yang questions how soon these can come to China while the Communist Party still holds power.

“If a people cannot face their history, these people won’t have a future,” he told the Journal. “That was one of the purposes for me to write this book. I wrote a lot of hard facts, tragedies. I wanted people to learn a lesson, so we can be far away from the darkness, far away from tragedies, and won’t repeat them.”
This is a Interview form a American Radio show ( my favorite ) The John Batchelor Show Interviewing Mr. Yang Jisheng Though A interpreter. Also on the scene is Mr. Gordon Chang, Mr. Batchelor's co host and writer for the WSJ
[video=youtube_share;NKXJEuFeD4k]http://youtu.be/NKXJEuFeD4k[/video]
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
This was posted as real news on yahoo and it turns out to be fake. Now the media is posting Onion-like stories among real news. How low can the news media get.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


French police have named actress Sharon Stone as their prime suspect in the daring heist, in which more than $1.4 million in jewels were stolen from a hotel room during the Cannes Film Festival. According to authorities, they zeroed in on the “Basic Instinct” star as their prime suspect after an IMDb search helped them realize the actress hasn’t been a movie star in almost a decade, which made her attendance at the Cannes Film Festival extremely suspicious, they noted.

“Sharon Stone’s last starring role in a major theatrical release was in 2006’s ‘Basic Instinct 2,’ which should have gone to straight-to-DVD anyway,” a spokesperson for the Nice police told Hollywood & Swine. “So what possible business does Sharon Stone have attending the 2013 Cannes Film Festival other than to steal expensive jewels? No one including Ms. Stone has been able to give us a good answer.”

When French detectives brought Stone in for questioning earlier today for her alleged involvement in the jewelry theft, she immediately began reciting popular lines from her infamous interrogation scene in 1992’s “Basic Instinct.” She then tried to intimidate detectives by uncrossing her legs, but officers explained to the Oscar-nommed actress that no one has wanted to see that since the ’90s.

Stone reportedly told detectives she was at the festival to see her former co-star Michael Douglas’ new Liberace biopic, “Behind the Candelabra.” Detectives quickly dismissed this as an unlikely motive for traveling across the globe to France, when like most of America, Stone could have waited until the film premiered on HBO. Detectives believe what may help them prove Stone is responsible for the jewel heist is the actress’s long and notorious history of theft. Detectives have numerous sworn affidavits by co-stars from her brief guest-starring stint on “Law & Order: SVU,” where Stone is accused of trying to steal every scene she was in by overacting.

I noticed also ads are being inserted as headlines sounding like the news. Then there's the headlines that are made to sound like news but is actually Wall Street trying to make people buy stock based on exploiting news events. So they will tell you the current news disguised as news stories and tell you what stocks to buy at the same time.
 
Last edited:

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Apparently very last minute. I read an article that this was at first an invitation by LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to come visit Los Angeles. Meeting Obama is actually secondary. It would be weird if a major leader in the world visits the US without meeting the President. They probably had to let Obama know.

If that is indeed the case than I think it would seem even more strange in that Xi would accept and make an actual state visit on the invitation of just a city mayor.
It's like the mayor or equivalent of Shanghai etc invites Obama and he goes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top