AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
t
Yes that's why I scoffed at first at the claiming it was the end of Western civilization. But now you have the intellectual elite trying to blame the US ever engaging in trade with China as the only factor why Hillary lost...? They can't see the many other direct factors to why voters were turned off from Hillary? They bothered to conduct an exercise on this and no other factors were included. You can spin anything to be anything and this is a prime example. I mention this before where the Washington Post's Robert Samuelson wrote an article blaming China for the 2008 Western financial collapse. He charged that if China didn't buy US Treasuries keeping interests rates low, people would've never have thought to get a loan to buy a home they couldn't afford that the greedy banks didn't scrutinize preventing default. There is a whole line of entities more directly responsible that were in position to prevent the 2008 collapse than concluding it was China's fault. You have the most important people in positions of power going way way out of their way not to blame it on themselves.
It may not be the end of Western civilization but it certainly the ingredients to how the Roman Empire fell.
The person you mentioned has a very narrow mind. He is essentially claiming aspects of human civilization which began in the west to be western exclusively. He rejects the idea that all human west or east will be openly and willingly learn from each other. He is claiming absolute ownership of part of human civilization.
I have a thought from another perspective though. Many part of that "western" civilization will live on as part of "eastern" civilization even after western countries dominance disappear. A few example, Communism, Socialism, Market Economy (with some change), the essence of democracy (not the exact copy of western model), Modern Scientific methodology etc. "Das Kapital" is surely an western "invention" and China will be the last and firmest upholder along with Socialism all being from the west.
And in the past, western civilization also imported a lot from the east or south, Christianity was surely a foreign one from Asia, but now it is widely a western thing.
My point is, things start from a specific place, but they never stay at the same place, once they spread they belong to all human being and the human creation, the civilization. And civilizations don't die, they merge with each other and live under a different name.
Yes that's why I scoffed at first at the claiming it was the end of Western civilization. But now you have the intellectual elite trying to blame the US ever engaging in trade with China as the only factor why Hillary lost...? They can't see the many other direct factors to why voters were turned off from Hillary? They bothered to conduct an exercise on this and no other factors were included. You can spin anything to be anything and this is a prime example. I mention this before where the Washington Post's Robert Samuelson wrote an article blaming China for the 2008 Western financial collapse. He charged that if China didn't buy US Treasuries keeping interests rates low, people would've never have thought to get a loan to buy a home they couldn't afford that the greedy banks didn't scrutinize preventing default. There is a whole line of entities more directly responsible that were in position to prevent the 2008 collapse than concluding it was China's fault. You have the most important people in positions of power going way way out of their way not to blame it on themselves.
It may not be the end of Western civilization but it certainly the ingredients to how the Roman Empire fell.
Last edited: